Breaking News

By what authority, rebuttal No legal authority.pdf. BAR members (attorneys, judges and law professors) claim we the People have no authority to restore Common Law, but they cannot show by what authority they make such a claim, We the People answer them. Letters from NY Court tru counsel - Prudinti tru counsel 9-26-13.pdf  Prudinti tru counsel 10-10-13.pdf




CLICK HERE FOR WEEKLY AUDIO UPDATES




Breaking News - December 8th 2014 - Fifty Common Law Grand Juries filed Presentments indicting Code Enforcement Officer Pantaleo for the murder of Eric Garner in the United States District Court for the Southern District of NY: Read the Presentment HERE > Officer_Pantaleo_NY._Presentment.pdf for the murder of Eric Garner



Breaking News November 10, 2014 Unified Common Law Grand Jury in every State files writ_quo_warranto.pdf in every Federal District Court, United States Supreme Court and served upon every Federal Judge and all 9 US Supreme Court Justices, see video below.



Breaking News October 29, 2014 Unified Common Law Grand Jury files mandamus.pdf  ordering Federal Judge to show cause why he did not obey the Law of the Land



BREAKING NEWS October 17, 2014 Unified Common Law Grand Jury granted Terry Trussell's petition for Writ Habaes Corpus - Terry was asked to serve on a statutory grand jury in Dixie County. He was selected by the presiding Judge Munkittrick as the foreman. As foreman, he was made aware of alleged criminal behavior by those government officials pushing Common Core curriculum in our public schools , who allegedly took bribes of money to change the curriculum. So, according to his duty, Terry tried to present the evidence to the statutory grand jury but the State Attorney Siegmeister interfered with his ability to perform the job of Grand Jury Foreman as per Florida Grand Jury Handbook and Florida Statutes 905.

So Terry wrote up and put into the public record a Bill of Information that included criminal charges of obstruction of justice along with jury tampering for the SA, and also hand delivered a 7 page letter to Judge Munkittrick , among other things, detailing to her the alleged felonies that he had witnessed Siegmesiter commit. Due to the actions of Seigmesiter, Terry declared the statutory grand jury as tainted and dismissed it.

Nothing happened so Terry was in a position where his sworn duty was to investigate any crime that came to his awareness according to Florida Statutes but the statutory grand jury had become tainted by State Attorney Seigmesiter. So Terry, knowing that the US is a Common Law Country and Florida is a Common Law state, asked the People of Dixie County if they wanted to, in accordance with the 5th amendment to our US Constitution,  stand up their own independent Common Law Grand Jury, which they did. After considering the evidence, The People's Grand Jury Under Common Law in Dixie County handed down two True Bills of Presentment, one against the alleged crimes of the SA and the other against the officials, after accepting money, pushing Common Core. This True Bills were also put into the public record.

In an act of retaliation against Terry for reporting crimes, the establishment is attacking Terry for doing his job as Grand Jury Foreman by reporting the True Bills and putting them into the public record. A Florida Department of Law Enforcement agent Frank Linton filed a defective affidavit, including with perjury and omission of exculpatory evidence, which Terry rebutted, but the Court Clerk has removed evidence from the public record. Also, the judge's order was defective as well as the arrest warrant was defective, all for various serious reasons.

So Terry is charged for crimes because he reported crimes, and he was first in early Sept, kept in jail about 24 hours, and bailed out. He then was arrested at his arraignment Oct 9 on charges of Failure to Appear because he did appear but the judge refused to recognize him. Pls go to www.jasonwhoyt.com and find all the articles and audio on Terry. You can listen to  Judge Hankinson call Terry's name 3 times, and Terry respond three times, and then the judge can be heard to say something like ...let the record show that Terry George Trussell did not appear, and I order his bail revoked and his immediate arrest. The sheriffs simply walked over and took Terry by the arm and lead him out of the court room and handcuffed him and took him to jail. There are over 20 signed, sworn, notarized affidavits that Terry did indeed appear even though the judge said he did not.

The coverup that is being engineered to hide criminal activity and to punish Terry appears to include many officials in both the county government and in the Circuit Court judicial system as well as FDLE. Please remember that as a Grand Juror, Terry has complete immunity for anything he does except for if he were to breach a witnesses rights. Since there were no witnesses called, he certainly did not breach anybody's rights. As a result on October 17, 2014 Unified Common Law Grand Jury granted Terry Trussell's petition for Writ Habaes Corpus. see petition and Habaes Corpus below.



  • BREAKING NEWS SEPTEMBER 16, 2014: In-Depth Interview with Terry Trussell of Dixie County, FL - Arrested by a Corrupt Judiciary. On Friday, September 12th, 2014, on the 5-year anniversary of the 9/12 March On Washington where 1.2 million people gathered in protest of the despicable behavior by their representatives in Washington, D.C., Terry Trussell of Dixie County, FL and I sat down for an in-depth interview to discuss why he was arrested and charged with several felonies. On September 2nd, 2014 just after 3:00 PM in the afternoon, Terry Trussell's life was changed forever. terry_trussell_interview.mp3








  • Consolidated True Bill.pdf Filed July 14th 2014 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York In one federal filing we refiled the indictments of 14 State judges and 2 clerks.


  • Bill of Information.pdf Filed July 14th 2014 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York Paper revealing that New York courts are controled by tyrants.




  • Hybrid papers disclaimer.pdf The purpose of this disclaimer is to deny any connection with Mr. Joaquin Mariano DeMoreta-Folch, who titles himself a God Grace Administrator, concerning his filing of papers in Sheridan County, Nebraska and any other papers he may have filed in other states/counties.
  • PRESS RELEASE DISCLAIMER.pdf The purpose of this disclaimer is to deny any connection with David Robinson’s PRESS RELEASE For JULY 4, 2014. NLA does not support or share the views of the following contents.






POSTED MAY 27, 2014 Federal Court Order to dismiss case and our response with a writ of error and an ultimatum. Take note that in the file Mandamus there is one Mandamus commanding the Federal Court to obey and a second (to be signed by the judge) from the Federal Court to the State courts.



POSTED MAY 9, 2014 Court date JUNE 2, 2014, stay-tuned for details.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK; James T. Foley Courthouse; Suite 509; 445 Broadway; Albany, NY 12207 on the 2nd day of June, 2014 at 9:30 AM;



POSTED APRIL 23, 2014 .


NY SUPREME COURT, GREEN COUNTY COURTHOUSE; 320 Main Street; Catskill, NY  12414 - POSTPONED AGAIN
PHONE -
(518) 625-3160;    FAX - (518) 943-0247
If you need assistance with coordinating travel from your area, you may call or email Ollie Johnson, one of the NY State coordinators at (845) 204-8158 and mroliverw@gmail.com
Court Hearing Thursday April 24, 2014 at 9:3o AM. If you cannot make it please fax, mail and call to let them know we are watching.


On March 28, 2014 the Columbia County Clerk retured our March 26th filing. We then filed the Writ of Quo Warranto, Writ of Probition and Writ of Mandamus.pdf with the Greene Couty Clerk on April 10, 2014and our hearing is now scheduled for Thursday, April 24, 2014 at 9:30 AM.


Posted Monday March 26, 2014
Writ of Prohibition, Warning to the Court. WRIT OF PROHIBITION.pdf


Posted Monday March 24, 2014
Quo Warranto filed in Columbia County New York, This is the begining of the end we need everyone paying attention. Quo Waranto filed 3-24-14.pdf


Posted Friday March 21, 2014
6th Open Letter to all NY Oath-takers, acting Judicial gate keepers, elected or appointed to secure the Republic Dear Sheriff.pdf


Posted Thursday March 10, 2014
5th Open Letter to all NY Oath-takers, acting Judicial gate keepers, elected or appointed to secure the Republic - 14-03-25 memo Sovereign.pdf


Posted Thursday March 6, 2014
News Wire Press Release 3-5-14.pdf
New York Law Journal, Albany NY. - John Caher Senior Reporter 3-6-14.mp3 


Posted Tuesday March 10, 2014
4th Open Letter to all NY Oath-takers, acting Judicial gate keepers, elected or appointed to secure the Republic -
Letter from Franklin County New York Sheriff to the Unified New York Common Law Grand Jury and the UNYCLGJ response - Franklin Sheriff letter and response.pdf


Posted Tuesday, February 25, 2014
Jersey City man advocating grand jury system with no government involvement.pdf


Posted Monday, Febuary 24, 2014
3rd Open letter to all New York Oath-takers 14-2-25 Memo to oath takers.pdf


Posted Thursday, February 20, 2014 Peliminary interviw 14-2-21 Fox News.com_.mp3 
The Anti-Defamation League claims adherents of the sovereign citizen movement are forming their own vigilante “grand juries”  ADL Press Release.pdf NLA Press release in response to ADA's fabricated press release. NLA answer to ADL Press Release.pdf


Posted Thursday, February 20, 2014 -
Phone call from Daily News in Charleston South Carolina press release - Press phone call 2-20-14.mp3


Posted Thursday, February 20, 2014 -
2nd Open Letter to all NY Oath-takers
, acting Judicial gate keepers, elected or appointed to secure the Republic - 14-2-20 MEMORANDUM.pdf


Posted Wednesday, February 19, 2014 -
Written article on Who is Organizing CLGJ's.pdf


Posted Wednesday, February 19, 2014 -
A must listen to  American Underground Network.mp3 recording on NSA's plan to shut down communications and what you can do about it


Posted Wednesday, February 12, 2014 -
Broome County NY answer to memo 2-12-14.pdf
answering 14-2-10 MEMORANDUM.pdf (letter) to oath takers.


Posted Monday, February 10, 2014
New York Unified Common Law Grand Jury Indicts Green County Judge and Court Clerk for Felony Rescue and other charges. Presentment 2-10-14.pdf, with letter.pdf to judge

1st Open Letter to all NY Oath-takers, acting Judicial gate keepers, elected or appointed to secure the Republic14-2-10 MEMORANDUM.pdf


Posted Monday, January 20, 2014
Saint Johns County Florida Common Law Grand Jury files Writ of Mandamus.pdf demanding access in the courthouse in order to function under judicial auspices.


Posted Wednesday, January 1, 2014 
From the Unified New York Supreme Court Bench to Greene County New York Supreme Court - Mandamus to Judge.pdf and Mandamus to Clerk.pdf Final notice to be delivered by sheriff Monday January 6, 2014.


Posted Saturday, Nov. 22, 2013
KVSL Radio 1450AM/107.9FM; Lakeside, AZ Guest Speaker John Darash, spokes person for the Common Law Grand Jury movement.


Published: Saturday, Nov. 9, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
Citizens group wants common law grand jury in Westmoreland County


Friday - November 8, 2013, By Rich Cholodofsky, A citizens group filed court documents on Friday seeking to convene a common law grand jury in Westmoreland County, but legal experts say such a body has no real authority. More...


11-7-13 letter from green county.pdf
Letter from New York Supreme Court, Greene County to the People of New York the common law fifth Amendment is null and Void. The Peoples' response - 11-11-13Letter to greene county clerk.pdf


November 7, 2013
Web Conference call with Randy Shannon and guest speaker John Darash, spokes person for the Common Law Grand Jury movement.


November 6, 2013
Web Conference call with Jeremy and guest speaker John Darash, spokes person for the Common Law Grand Jury movement.


November 4, 2013 -
Common Law Grand Jury files Quo Warranto.pdf with Greene County Supreme Court for hesitating to process True Bill of Indictment, against their colleagues, as required by law for arraignment, scheduling, and the removal from office ... For more details read the Quo Warranto.


October 31, 2013
Blog Talk Radio with Drake Bailey's interview with John Darash, spokes person for the Common Law Grand Jury movement, who explains how Liberty’s Light is moving across America by the constituting of Common Law Juries in all 3141 counties which has taken deep roots, now in 48 states, in just four short months.


October 25, 2013  Press Release 10-25-13.pdf copy
Released by PressAgent@NationalLibertyAlliance.org


COPY OF FILED INDICTMENT Presentment 10-21-13-1.pdf
On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 an indictment was handed down, and filed at the New York Supreme Court, Greene County; located at 320 Main Street Catskill, NY by (Eighteen) Unified New York Common Law Grand Juries from Bronx County, Columbia County, Dutchess County, Greene County, Kings County, Nassau County, New York County, Orange County, Putnam County, Queens County, Rockland County, Sullivan County, Suffolk County, Westchester County, Niagara County, Ulster County, Monroe County, and Schenectady County of New York; against New York (1) Supreme Court Chief Administrative Judge A. Gail Prudenti; (2) Deputy Chief Judge Michael V. Coccoma; (3) Suffolk County District Administrative Judge Judge C. Randall Hinrichs; and (4) Administrative Judge Allan D. Scheinkman, 9th Judicial District; for High Treason, Conspiracy, Obstruction of Justice, RICO, and eleven other charges.


October 21, 2013 - Press Release 10-21-13.pdf
Released by PressAgent@NationalLibertyAlliance.org
New York is “ground zero” - A major grassroots’ movement that started in New York with the constituting of its first Common Law Grand Jury on July 18, 2013 has taken America by storm, spreading to 48 States in just a few months. New York has constituted Grand Juries in the Bronx, New York, Kings, Queens, Nassau, Suffolk, Westchester, Rockland, Putnam, Orange, Sullivan, Ulster, Dutchess, Columbia, Greene, Schenectady, Monroe and Niagara counties in just three months, by people keen on setting the brush fires of freedom in the minds of men.

On the other hand, our hired servants prefer the status quo, thereby they're not too keen to receive the People back in control of the Peoples judicial and political processes. Lysander Spooner, author of Trial by Jury (1852) said: “any government, that is its own judge of, and determines authoritatively for, the people, what its own powers are over the people, is an absolute government, of course. It has all the powers that it chooses to exercise. There is no other, or at least, no more accurate definition of despotism than this”. Thomas Jefferson in writing the Declaration of Independence said: “That to secure Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed”. It is the People (Grand Jury) that consent to government. To dismiss the Common Law Grand Jury is to dismiss the Bill of Rights and reject our founding document, the Declaration of Independence.

The Common Law Grand Jury is an unalienable right, protected under the Law by the Fifth Amendment. Common Law is synonymous with Natural Law which can never be codified or supplanted, for Common Law is our American Heritage, born of the Declaration of Independence. But four New York Supreme Court Judges would have us believe that Common Law can be superseded by four progressive judges in the (1961) case Wood v Hughes. To the contrary, in a stunning six to three (1992) Decision that went unnoticed, until now, Justice Antonin Scalia writing for the majority said: “The grand jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the branches described in the first three Articles. “It is a constitutional fixture in its own right. In fact the whole theory of its function is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Government and the people”... “Our Founding Fathers presciently thereby, created a "buffer" the people may rely upon for justice, when public officials, including judges, criminally violate the law.”… “The common law of the Fifth Amendment demands a traditional functioning grand jury”… “It is in effect a fourth branch of government governed and administered to directly by and on behalf of the American people, and its authority emanates from the Bill of Rights”. Thus, citizens have the unbridled right to empanel their own grand juries and present "True Bills" of indictment to the court, which is then required to commence a criminal proceeding.

Furthermore, on "Constitutional Issues" the United States Supreme Court rulings are the "Law of the Land" (unless repugnant to the same) and therefore over rules all State Supreme Court rulings.

Judge A. Gail Prudenti, Judge Michael V. Coccoma, Judge C. Randall Hinrichs and Judge Allan D. Scheinkman have taken it upon themselves to prevent the 18 New York constituted Common Law Grand Juries from taking their inherited seats as consentors. These judges have filed false reports with the FBI on at least three different occasions and have threatened We the People, claiming there would be “Regrettable legal consequences” should We the People continue in pursuit of our unalienable right to consent, established under the Declaration of Independence and protected under the Fifth Amendment.

On October 15, 2013  the Unified (18) Common Law Grand Juries answered Judge A. Gail Prudenti, Judge Michael V. Coccoma, Judge C. Randall Hinrichs, and Judge Allan D. Scheinkman with a final letter, citing acts of treason and giving them until Friday, October 18th to obey the People and step aside or face the consequences of indictment by presentment of a True Bill. 10-15-13 Letter to Judges.pdf

On Thursday, October 17th 2013, at 3:22 PM Judge A. Gail Prudenti, Judge Michael V. Coccoma, Judge C. Randall Hinrichs, and Judge Allan D. Scheinkman replied … “your correspondence is based on an erroneous reading of the law, and is hereby rejected”. Therefore said True Bill was filed with the court Monday October 21, 2013, by certified mail. Presentment 10-21-13-1.pdf

Please support our endeavor, help keep NLA on the web,
Donate $5.00 or more a month, and become a Premier Member, Thank you.

Comments

janjay's picture

The motion had the state and the AG as the plaintiff and it was a motion along with other documents (evidence) for the AG to address the issues, because under federal and state laws the AG is suppose to step in (I do not know the laws that was used by hard but I did see the laws that was mention in the motion) and I was told that the AG could not response to the motion because he had no evidence to back up any response and that is why he sealed the case.

I was also told that the same package went to the sheriff and the person walked into the sheriff's office with the same package that was sent to the AG and that person had a talk with the sheriff before he presented his package to him ( I guess to informed him about the package he is presenting to him) and the sheriff stood up and shook the person's hand and said I finally get to meet my boss

So I wanted to know what the sealing of the foreclosure case by AG mean. I did not get a chance to ask the individual that question.

but I will, when I get a chance to talk to them again.

douglas's picture

To my knowledge, and I'm not an attorney but I have dealt with the law for years, in any action everything goes to the court with a copy to the other party. If someone was being foreclosed on, the mortgage company would file with the court through the clerk of the court and deliver copies to the borrower. The borrower would respond to the court through the clerk of the court and also deliver a copy to the mortgage company.

Now, if someone was suing the State in federal court, than the papers would go to the fed court through the fed clerk with copies to the state AG. However, the state AG would have no authority to just seal the papers. They would have to file a response to the fed court and the court would make a ruling.

Stu Maryland's picture

I've tried numerous times to move beyond these 10 questions and it won't take. According to the video (at 4:40 of part 4) it is John Adams that is the answer to question 3 but he is not listed as an answer...anyone get past this point? How? What's the magic formula?

email: stu.mdclgj@gmail.com

janjay's picture

Sorry about that folks, do not know how my request got out there 3 times.

janjay's picture

Need help. I signed up for the Common Law Course, but after signing up I am not able to find the course.

Could someone direct me to the courses. Thanks

janjay's picture

Need help. I signed up for the Common Law Course, but after signing up I am not able to find the course.

Could someone direct me to the courses. Thanks

janjay's picture

Need help. I signed up for the Common Law Course, but after signing up I am not able to find the course.

Could someone direct me to the courses. Thanks

Cherock1254's picture

Here is my heartburn, this PDF on the Quo Warranto is NOT signed by the jury foreman, nor has the state seal or the clerk's stamp. I don't know if this document has even been filed. Nobody knows. I would suggest from now on, if you are going to put a PDF out on this site, and tell people it has been filed, then show the complete document with all the signature and stamps on it, then we will all know it is a real filed version. The document is incomplete, therefore in my eyes, it is not legal, it is just some document someone put together, but did not do anything with it. Just my two cents.

vhannevig's picture

Shouldn't the lead line in Breaking News "BREAKING NEWS SEPTEMBER 16, 2004: In-Depth Interview with Terry Trussell of Dixie County, FL - Arrested by a Corrupt Judiciary. On Friday, September 12th, 2014, ... " read "BREAKING NEWS SEPTEMBER 16, 2014 ... "?

proboknows1's picture

u got a state case #1234
u file counter complaint "boilerplate" on Friday in state court
Monday u file copies in federal court w/ file on demand
serve process via us marshal cost money?
whats next???
Please add more

Bo

pcguru.biz's picture

We had a public vote on July 3rd and unanimously re-instated the Common Law Grand Jury. I've already sent the paperwork into the clerks.

padutch40's picture

Can anyone direct me to the location of the info on the postcards John mentioned on Monday's call-in? THANKS

sofasurferlinux's picture

The courts have shown their contempt. They have shown their intent to simple brush us off. They have shown their willingness to prefer prison to enforcing the constitution. We have shown no method to compel them. They have all the power they need as long as we are unwilling to use force. The answer is in the sheriffs, who apparently, at this point are cowards and traitors and worthy of punishment reserved for traitors. The only entity that has so far shown a willingness to enforce the constitution is the militia. A meeting with the militia is the next nessessary step, to gather their support and influence.

sofasurferlinux's picture

So Jackson County, KY has a sheriff that has the courage that we need and wouldn't you know it, there doesn't seem to be anyone organizing that county. Just sayin', someone aught to jump on that opportunity.

sofasurferlinux's picture

And he is on Sheriff Mack's list of 2nd amendment supporters and he signed the CSPOA resolution.

sofasurferlinux's picture

Chat page with the radio shows is broken. I get a "404 error". Are the shows listed somewhere else? Also, does anyone have links to radio shows for other CLGJ locations?

JAZ's picture

I noticed in the April 23, 2014 posting of documents, the first one dated 4/18/14 "Decision Rescinded.pdf", written by Raymond Elliott III Justice, the document is stamped in two places in big red letters "RESINDED". Sorry, but I cannot even find that word in a regular dictionary, much less Black's Law Dictionary.

Can someone tell me what RESINDED means. I am joking, of course, but do the New York Supreme Court even know how to spell ????? The words means nothing, because it is NOT a word.

I noticed that when it was posted on the NLA website, however, that the word is spelled correctly. Of course it was posted by the NLA team.

Rescind - to abrogate; annul; cancel, as a law.
Abrogate - to abolish; repeal; annul; cancel

Here is the posting under News/Breaking News:
POSTED APRIL 23, 2014 Next target court date May 12, 2014, stay-tuned for confermation. (confirmation)

14-04-18 Decision Rescinded.pdf
14-04-23 Writ of error.pdf
14-04-23 Fraud on the Court.pdf

When you view the document, the word RESINDED is in red ink. However, when you print the document, there is no RESINDED markings on the document.

In my book, spelling is important. Especially when issuing and filing court documents.

Jo Ann
Texas

mark4th's picture

BREAKING NEWS - Mandamus from the bench to Judge

the link to the PDF here is 404 - delete this post if you fix that btw :)

AmerizonWarrior's picture

Berkeley County and Dorchester County have been constituted! The ball is rolling! Let's KEEP IT ROLLING!

Drake's picture

After peaceful remedies are exhausted, we will come up against 'enforcement'.
I offer that as a separate branch, we will have to offer the same independent
enforcement.
There are 'offices' that have been vacant or never used in this area.
I hereby offer my services.
I hope I am found acceptable in this effort to serve.

sofasurferlinux's picture

I know John Darash is hopeing to have a stenographer in court on the 7th to record the proceedings. I think it would be very worth while to also have a video record. Being able to watch the proceedings would be very educational and imagine whn the judges find out they are on youtube where everyone can watch them be chopped down.

I know in my neck of the woods cameras are not allowed in court. However, on the 7th there may be so many people trying to get into the courthuse that security will not be able to check everyone. This is where the small action cams come in handy. There are many to chose from. Some of the are only about 2 inches across and can easily be buried in a purse. Some may even be un-noticable hanging from a key chain. Prices range from around $29-$400 and evertything in between.

http://www.amazon.com/Vivitar-DVR785HD-BLU-Waterproof-Action-Camcorder/d... ...$49 at Amazon but on sale at Meijer for $39

There are many brands...Emerson, GoPro, Xcel.

Something to consider.

skattums's picture

Could someone tell me the name of the communication tool John was talking about at the start of the show?

genesis.restoration's picture

Listen to the questions that John Caher ask and listen to the answers that John Darash gives(listen to the audio above Posted Thursday March 6, 2014)

What is new and what is different? what is this all about?

What is a common law grand jury?

Can you can convene a grand jury of your friends and invite somebody?

How does this work? if it's not the court system then who sets it up?

Under your system who sets up the grand jury?

When you say New York is the first to establish a common law grand jury what are you talking about?

How is life different for me as of the 27th of February 2014? What happened on the 27th?

As a result of that how are things different?

What can the common law grand jury do and not do? As a practical matter what can you do?

What is the story?

Think about the questions for yourself and how you would answer, do you understand why you're answering the way you are? When you understand the questions and the legitimate answers you can go in confidence to establish you're common law grand jury in your county, you can do this!

To learn more get with your county coordinators and state coordinators,

Kevin ( NY State coordinator)
716-225-2500

angela desmond's picture

John Caher, another clueless sentry for the status quo who's lost in the matrix and doesn't even know why. Law journal reporter? Take him away from statutes and he's lost. Only the brainwashed or paid NWO minions allowed into mainstream (lame-stream?) press.

sofasurferlinux's picture

On the monday night radio show I heard discussion of using Linux operating system to make your computer more secure. Linux IS more secure than windows is but against the government's criminal hacking it is probably no match.

Linux is FREE to anyone who wants to use it instead of using Windows. Linux is Free and Windows costs what....a couple hundred dollars every few years? Any software that will work for windows and that costs money money money can be matched with equal or superior FREE software that will run on Linux. Windows will not operate on very old computers. It is to big to fit on the hard drive and it is to complicated for the old computer circuitry. Linux work great on almost any computer, even very old ones.

You can have both Windows and Linux on the same hard drive. You choose, at start up, which one you want to use. You can later remove windows after you dicide you no longer want it on your computer. You can even put it on a DVD and run it from the DVD to take it for a test drive and then choose the option to install it on you PC later.

Linux require no defragmentation, no anti-virus (although you can use it if you want to be sure. Linux does not have issues with "broken DLL files" that nobody understands.

There is MANY MANY differant varients of Linux. Here are some... http://www.linux.com/directory/Distributions

I have found the varient called "Ubuntu" to be the best and easiest for me. Here is where you get it... http://www.ubuntu.com/download/desktop

You can get 24/7 support for Ubuntu on a forum that is probably the best and fastest source of help that I have found on the internet. Here is that forum... http://ubuntuforums.org/ You can also go on this forum to ask peoples opinions of Ubuntu and learn more about it before you decide to install it.

I have used Ubuntu for many years. It does not "break" like Windows does. Mine has run for years with no break downs.

One last thing. If you decide to try it out, here are the program packages (all free) that you can get instead of using the software that Windows uses, and its all as good or probably better that the Windows versions... http://ubuntuguide.org/wiki/Alternatives

And a couple other thoughts...The reason Windows users have problems with "flash player" is because they are using Windows and Flash Player. YOU WILl NOT HAVE ANY OF THESE ISSUES WITH LINUX SOFTWARE. Windows is a defective product designed to REQUIRE costly upgrades. Linux will download upgrades and updates, as needed, automatically and you will not even be aware that it is happening. Videos will play flawlessly and so will audio. Sites requiring Flash Player will not be a problem any more. Word processing will not be an issue. Finding other software to use with linux to perform other tasks will never be a problem. And everything is FREE.

There is no reason to have Windows on your PC unless you enjoy breakdowns, stress, data loss, viruses, hackers and throwing away large amounts of money on a product that will be obsolete in a few months or years.

Hope this helps.

JAZ's picture

I have had Linux for quite some time...Ubuntu 12.04 LTS version. However, within the last month or so my system has been acting up and becoming unstable. After listening to the audio under Feb 19 from the Amn Underground Network, he states in there that Ubuntu is not reommended for security as they sell their data to Amazon. I am now having Mint 65 Petra installed on my computer.

For an overseas email account, I use www.confidesk.com. They are based in Switzerland and their metadata is stored there and they explicitly stated that they do not share their metadata with the USA or the EU, nor can these two entities access it. Therefore, I recommend everyone sign up for a confidesk email account among all your group members for NLA correspondence. The data is encrypted both ways when both sender and receiver have a confidesk email account. I've had this email account now for over two years and never had spam or any other problems that I had with Yahoo. Yahoo, gmail, and all other USA email account entities are all accessible to the NSA.

sofasurferlinux's picture

Just wondering...I read that the FBI approached some CLGJ people to question them about their activities. Upon the FBI hearing the truth about this movement they when away and did not return. So, I wonder if the FBI would be a party to approaching tyrant judges and such and explain to them how they are committing crimes by their not recognizing the CLGJ.

mrbagobeans's picture

they have a lot to learn -they seem to have indicted the whole world. anything they may have accomplished could have been done by CLGJ at the local level.
How do we know this org. is on the level?

unKonnon Law u.s.trusted advisor's picture

Texas state v STATE OF TEXAS John Doe v JOHN DOE dallas county v COUNTY OF DALLAS organic v FEDERAL CIVIL ADMINISTRATION court clerk v CLERK OF THE COURT notice evidence of both and realize the federal civil administration is overlayed on the organic american land

EmilyCL's picture

What a jerk the officer was. All the cops seem to care about these days is power and control and inflicting brute force on people. It is disgusting. They should be showing a little deference since they are public servants after all. But we haven't seen that from them in 50 years.

John Darash's picture

BREAKING NEWS - Posted Wednesday, January 1, 2014 Posted Mandamus.pdf to Greene County New York Supreme Court Judge Final notice to be delivered by sheriff on Monday January 6, 2014. Post everywhere and e-mail and fax to local and national news media.

Pages