NEWS - Constitution in Jeopardy

Certified Letter to Daniel Sutton.pdf

For the Latest on the Unified Common Law Grand Jury court filings click here

Published on Jan 27, 2016

Published on Jan 6, 2016

Published on Jan 6, 2016

Published on Jan 5, 2016

Published on Dec 17, 2015

Published on Dec 5, 2015

It is “TIME” to hold all judges accountable we are “NOW” venturing into a massive campaign to expose the out of control judicial corruption (RICO) across America. We will be serving “every” federal judge and filing in all 94 Federal District Courts across America simultaneously. NOW IS THE TIME to pay attention and become active. YOUR PARTICIPATION IS NEEDED, it’s your duty!

..."The words 'district court of the United States' commonly describe constitutional courts created under Article III of the Constitution, not the legislative courts which have long been the courts of the Territories." [Mookini v. U.S., 303 U.S. 201, 205, 58 S.Ct. 543, 545, 82 L.Ed. 748. (See also Longshoremen v. Juneau Spruce Corp., 324 U.S. 237; Reynolds v. U.S., 98 U.S. 145, 154; McAlister v. U.S., 141 U.S. 174; U.S. v. Burroughs, 289 U.S. 159, 163]

28 U.S. Code § 132 - Creation and composition of district courts (a) There shall be in each judicial district a district court which shall be a court of record known as the United States District Court for the district.

A COURT OF RECORD. "A judicial tribunal  having attributes and exercising functions independently of the person of the magistrate designated generally to hold it ... proceeding according to the course of common law". [Jones v. Jones, 188 Mo.App. 220, 175 S.W. 227, 229; Ex parte Gladhill, 8 Metc. Mass., 171, per Shaw, C.J. See, also, Ledwith v. Rosalsky, 244 N.Y. 406, 155 N.E. 688, 689][Black's Law Dictionary, 4th Ed., 425, 426]

The decisions of a superior court may only be challenged in a court of appeal. The decisions of an inferior court are subject to collateral attack. In other words, in a superior court one may sue an inferior court directly, rather than resort to appeal to an appellate court. Decision of a court of record may not be appealed. It is binding on ALL other courts. However, no statutory or constitutional court (whether it be an appellate or supreme court) can second guess the judgment of a court of record. “The judgment of a court of record whose jurisdiction is final, is as conclusive on all the world as the judgment of this court would be. It is as conclusive on this court as it is on other courts. It puts an end to inquiry concerning the fact, by deciding it." [Ex parte Watkins, 3 Pet., at 202-203. [cited by SCHNECKLOTH v. BUSTAMONTE, 412 U.S. 218, 255 (1973)].

Memos to Sheriff

More powerful documents


The following papers define important legal terms and positions that We the People should have knowledge of and can assist you in court. If you are going to file a case you should take our free civics course above.



I would like to suggest seven books that have greatly helped me in my understanding of the law and its history and who our founding fathers really were. Ultimately the war of darkness against light as Benjamin Franklyn said "We the People will be ruled by God or Tyrants," there are no other choices.   

More filings ...

Please support our endeavor, help keep NLA on the web,
Donate $5.00 or more a month, and become a Premier Member, Thank you.

Notice: Anyone posting to this forum be advised that this is reserved for discussion on our paperwork and filings. ANY unrelated posts will be deleted and repeat offenders will be blocked from posting anywhere on this site.

The comment area below is for on point “discussion”, any off point conversation will be deleted and abusive members will be blocked.


Joanne Fiorito's picture

on Monday night's call John D. was reading the land grab paperwork (note link)

John mentioned three typos that needed fixing before sending this question is were the typos corrected since I know in the link above one of the typos wasn't fixed, and am unsure what the other two are unless I go back and rehear Monday night's call....

the one typo I know of is this:

Line 114 of Writ:

"government agents are setting fires..."

when in fact it should read as: government agents have set fires

I'd hate to see paperwork thrown out due to a technicality, or be used as a teaching tool that can undermine those who wish to learn....

respectfully yours,

Jo-Jo in PA

keslinger's picture

Couldn't get the link is there another one?'s picture

hello all i was just wondering if it was possible to get more info in the Call to Action section on the reason the defendants were approached in the first place. i just want to understand the action that caused the policy enforcers to come out in the first place. Such is the question in the Missouri substance abuse case. thank you cindy

Injured Party's picture

Today we had court and they have already adopted our other children and preparing to terminate our last child's bond from us. When the Habeas Corpus and the UUSCLGJ are in what are the chances we get our children back?

trefarmerh's picture

It is hard to dispute the truth and these four videos say it like it is. This in NOT just a local problem. It becomes a local problem when no one from outside cares enough to help. I have sent everyone in my email address book a invite to to view these videos. I have even commented on Oath Keepers asking why they and Info Wars are not telling the truth as it is in these videos. Due to what the lady is saying in the Jan. 5 video, I believe that if the BLM, or their infiltrators within the Bundy group, do not start a false flag operation that the BLM will have no choice but to stand down in order to keep from throwing each other under the bus. P.S. Should anything bad happen to the group, I will be in need of funding to get from Florida to Oregon.