Committees of Safety Will Save America

Our Goal is to create 3133 Committees of Safety to save America, at least one for each county.
Presently, people in 144 counties have signed up with the intention to form Committees of Safety in their area, or are in the process of being formed, or have been formed.

"An enlightened citizenry is indispensable for the proper functioning of a republic. Self-government is not possible unless the citizens are educated sufficiently to enable them to exercise oversight. It is therefore imperative that the nation see to it that a suitable education be provided for all its citizens.“ -- Thomas Jefferson

We the People can save America, we only need to organize America and get the message of the “Constitutional Chain of Command” to our Sheriffs and our local governments. The fate of America is in your hands; our children are depending on us. There are about 30 or 40 counties out of 3133 that do not have a Sheriff in those counties work with whoever replaced them, in Alaska it would be the State Police and in Connecticut it’s the State Marshal.

President John F. Kennedy said: “A revolution is coming – a revolution which will be peaceful if we are wise enough; compassionate if we care enough; successful if we are fortunate enough – but a revolution which is coming whether we will it or not. We can affect its character; we cannot alter its inevitability”.

I am convinced that We the People through the COS’s can affect the character of the revolution, a peaceful revolution. I promise that if we can accomplish our goal of 3000+/- Committees of Safety, by God’s mercy we will have saved America by God’s grace. Time is short we must move quickly.

The COS is a vehicle that our founding fathers used to organize and execute the Revolution and then used to run the government until 1789 when the Constitution was ratified and the United States of America was born. Organizing COS’s in 3000 +/- counties will also easily accomplish our goal of filling 4 Administrative positions in every county and no doubt will give us the critical mass needed to save America.

Go to and read the “COS Handbook” this will give tremendous insight to our plan, empower you and give us all hope.

If you are starting a Committee of Safety in your County please go here first > < to find out if one has already been started. If not start one and click on Register your Committee of Safety on the top of that page.

The purpose of NLA is to facilitate Education, Communications, Principles and Organization Nationally at the grass roots level in order to enable the People to exercise their unalienable right of oversite and save Our Republic. Our founders formed Committes of Safety throughout the colonies which were used to organize and communicate ideas of Liberty and the construction of our Republic. Please watch the following Power Point Video that will give an indepth presentation on History, Authority and how to form a Committees of Safety (COS) in your County. And download the COS Handbook and other helpfull files that will give you step by step instructions and forms in order to start a COS in your County. And CLICK HERE to Join our Committee Of Safety National Meetings every Thursday at 9PM EASTERN for further instructions and Q&A.

Download copy of Committee of Safety Power Point Video
To download the following videos, right click the link and click save link as.

Committees of Safety Documents
See Handbook below for step by step instructions to create a COS



As part of One Community’s four-phase strategy and global change methodology, our Phase II food infrastructure is an open source project-launch blueprinting of 6 structures that will represent 3 different aquapini and walipini designs. These 6 structures will be a part of our botanical garden model and will produce a diversity of delicious and nutritious food far beyond anything found in a typical grocery store. This open source hub includes the following sections:

NLA Revolution

Committees of Safety Recordings


@rutharcle's picture

At the same time these thousands of elite US Army paratroopers are training to conduct low-level combat drops to seize territory and buildings in terrain matching conditions found in the Potomac River Basin where Washington D.C. is located, this report concludes, further evidence of what President Trump is planning can be seen in the US Army readying a massive order for M16A4 Assault Rifles—an ordering of hundreds-of-thousands of these weapons that are unable to be fired in full automatic mode clearly showing that they’re intended to be used by American-civilians—millions of whom under US federal law are members of the Reserve Militia, that includes all able bodied American men between the ages 17 to 45nearly 19 million of whom already have permits to carry a concealed handgun—and upon being called into action by Trump to defend their nation, will face a rabid and demented socialist Democrat Party enemy who’ve apparently forgotten that these Republicans are 1-0 in fighting civil wars.

mrbagobeans's picture

"If men, through fear, fraud, or mistake, should in terms renounce orgive up any natural right, the eternal law of reason and the grand endof society would absolutely vacate such renunciation. The right tofreedom being the gift of Almighty God, it is not in the power of manto alienate this gift and voluntarily become a slave."-- Samuel Adams(1722-1803), was known as the "Father of the American Revolution." Samuel Adams instigated the Boston Tea Party, was one of the signers of the Declaration of Independence, called for the first Continental Congress, and served as a member of Congress until 1781. Samuel Adams formed the Committees of Correspondence, which were largely responsible for the unity and cohesion of the Colonists preceding the Revolution. The original committee, formed in Boston, had three goals: (1) To delineate the rights of Colonists as men; (2) To detail how these rights had been violated; (3) To publicize these rights and the violations thereof throughout the Colonies.

deckape's picture

UNALIENABLE vs INALIENABLE  There are too many people who claim these words are interchangeable, that they mean the same. THEY DO NOT.  Unalienable” vs. “Inalienable” 15 Jul             11 Votes   The following is an email exchange between myself and one who listens to my be radio shows.  The listener was concerned that I regularly “mispronunciate” (as former President Bush would say) the word “unalienable”.  I explained that the “mispronunciation” is done intentionally to absolutely distinguish between the words “unalienable” (which implicates our Father YHWH Elohiym and is non-commercial) and “inalienable” (whose power is comparatively trivial).  Hi Alfred,  I’ve been enjoying your AIH broadcasts on 3215.0 kHz at 23:00 Eastern. You’ve been very informative…I feel that if I miss a show between Tuesdsay and Friday, I’ve fallen behind! I am particularly intrigued by the “all upper-case name” theory. You probably have heard from others that there’s virtually no place else to go in order to get the information and theoretical discussion you present, but let me add my voice to theirs.  I do have a question. You pronounce “unalienable” as “un-a-LEEN-able”…but the only pronunciation I’m aware of is “uhn-eyl-yuh-nuh-buh l” (, as in alien, alienate, etc., with the accent always on the “a”. It could just be that it jars my musician’s ears (I was a professional violinist before becoming a software architect), but is there some specific reason you pronounce it that way? In any event, this is a minor quibble about an otherwise-invaluable discussion. A discussion, I fear, that our current Administration will move to suppress soon…I hope to God I’m wrong. Keep informing us.  Best regards,  Tom  Hi Tom,  Thanks for listening; thanks for the compliments.  It’s not an accident that I pronounce “unalienable” the way I do.  I understand that most people pronounce it as you described and I understand that my “mis-pronouncing” the word will probably “jar” their “ear”.  While most of the world seems to pronounce “unalienable” as “un-A-lee-un-a-ble,” I intentionally pronounce the word “un-a-LEEN-a-ble”.  Why?  Because the meanings of the words “inalienable” and “unalienable” are vastly different and I wish to make absolutely clear whenever I use the latter instead of the former.  According to Black’s Law Dictionary (8th Edition; A.D. 2004), the definition of “inalienable” is:  “Not transferable or assignable. . . .  Also termed unalienable”.  Black‘s 8th does not even define “unalienable” and would thus  have us believe that the words “inalienable” and “unalienable” are synonymous.  But if we go back to Black‘s 2nd (A.D. 1910) we’ll see that “inalienable” was defined as:  “Not subject to alienation; the characteristic of those things which cannot be bought or sold or transferred from one person to another such as rivers and public highways and certain personal rights; e.g., liberty.”  Black’s 2nd defines “unalienable” as:  “Incapable of being aliened, that is, sold and transferred.”  At first glance the two terms seem pretty much synonymous.  However, while the word “inalienable” is “not subject to alienation,” the word “unalienable” is “incapable of being aliened”.  I believe the distinction between these two terms is this:  “Unalienable” is “incapable” of being aliened by anyone, including the man who holds something “unalienable”.  Thus, it is impossible for any individual to sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of an “unalienable Right”.  it is impossible for you to take one of my “unalienable rights”.  It is likewise impossible for me to even voluntarily surrender, sell or transfer one of my “unalienable rights”.  Once I have something “unalienable,” it’s impossible for me to get rid of it.  It would be easier to give up the color of my eyes or my heart than to give up that which is “unalienable”.  That which is “inalienable,” on the other hand, is merely “not subject to alienation”.  Black’s 2nd does not declare that it’s absolutely impossible for that which is “inalienable” to be sold, transferred or assigned.  Instead, I believe that “inalienable” merely means that “inalienable rights” are not subject to “alienation” by others.  That is, no one can compel me to sell, abandon or transfer any of my “inalienable” rights.  I am not “subject” to compelled “alienation” by others.  But that leaves open the question of whether I may am entitled to voluntarily and unilaterally sell, transfer, abandon or otherwise surrender that which is “inalienable”.  Thus, while it is impossible for me to abandon, or for government to take, my “unalienable rights,” it is possible for me to voluntarily waive my “inalienable” rights.  I strongly suspect that our gov-co presumes that our rights are at best “inalienable,” and that since we have not expressly claimed them, we could have and therefore must have waived them.  if we look at Bouvier’s Law Dictionary (A.D. 1856) we’ll see:  “INALIENABLE.  A word denoting the condition of those things the property in which cannot be lawfully transferred from one person to another.  Public highways and rivers are inalienable.  There are also many rights which are inalienable, as the rights of liberty or of speech.”  “UNALIENABLE.  Incapable of being transferred.  Things which are not in commerce, as, public roads, are in their nature unalienable.  Some things are unalienable in consequence of particular provisions of the law forbidding their sale or transfer; as, pensions granted by the government.  The natural rights of life and liberty are unalienable.”  Clearly, the words are not synonymous.  While “inalienable” rights can’t be “lawfully” transferred “to another,” they might nevertheless be waived by the holder or perhaps “unlawfully” (privately??) “transferred” to someone else.  However, those rights which are “unalienable” are absolutely incapable of being transferred lawfully, unlawfully, administratively, privately or by implication or operation of law.  that which you have, which is “unalienable,” is your wrists in an absolute sense that cannot possibly be discarded, transferred, sold, or otherwise abandoned.  Also, note that the word “unalienable” describes things which are “not in commerce”.  However, it appears that those things which are “inalienable” could be “in commerce”.  as you know, much of the trouble we have with the modern government is based on government’s claim of power to regulate all that is involved in interstate commerce.  In so far as you may be able to prove that any item or right you seek to use or exercise is “unalienable,” that item or write would be beyond the power of our government to regulate under interstate commerce.  You can see the power potential in “unalienable”.  Most importantly, as declared in the “Declaration of Independence,” all men are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights.  Our unalienable rights flow from God and are not subject to man’s meddling.  Bouvier’s agrees by defining “unalienable” as including our “natural” rights (which flow from “nature’s God”).  Admittedly, both “inalienable” and “unalienable” are defined to include the concept of “liberty”.  Thus, there is some confusion, some overlap, in the two definitions. Some things may be both “inalienable and also “unalienable”.  Therefore, my argument about the distinctions between the two terms is not necessarily as pristine as I would like.  Nevertheless, the two terms are significantly different and virtually all of the real power will be found in the word “unalienable” rather than in the word “inalienable”.  Those things which are “unalienable” are from God, outside of commerce, and impossible to “alienate” by external force or by personal consent.  “Inalienable” offers no advantages that I’m able to see as compared to “unalienable”.  “Inalienable” offers some possible disadvantages such as the possibility that you might be allowed to voluntarily waive whatever “inalienable” rights you possess.  I conclude that while there may be some confusion between the two terms, “unalienable” offers great and absolute power while “inalienable” is far weaker, more conditional, and probably subject to at least some “alienation”.  So why take a chance?  Why not make it your business to ensure that every time you have a chance to use one word or the other you always choose to use “unalienable”?  Why not use the exact word (“unalienable”) that was used by Thomas Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence?  While the words “inalienable” and “unalienable” have significantly different meanings, their “sounds” are almost identical and only a highly-tuned “ear” will note the distinction in sound and then meaning between them.  I believe our modern gov-co fears and detests “unalienable” but doesn’t much mind that we use the word “inalienable”.  The first term is lethal to gov-co powers; the second is not particularly threatening.  I visited the Thomas Jefferson Memorial in Washington DC about five years ago.  I was amazed to see that the Jefferson Memorial includes an excerpt from the “Declaration of Independence” attributed to Jefferson that referred to our “inalienable Rights”.  But the text of the Declaration of Independence” expressly refers to our “unalienable Rights”.  Thus, the “Declaration of Independence” is misquoted in 12″ high letters that are carved in stone.  I couldn’t be more surprised if the gov-co has misspelled Jefferson’s name.  I cannot believe that the designers and builders of the Jefferson Memorial misspelled “unalienable” or “accidentally” replaced “unalienable” with “inalienable”.  This change was done intentionally and because the word “inalienable” is trivial while the word “unalienable” is powerful to a spiritual degree.  I am discouraged to realize that tens of millions (maybe hundreds of millions) of Americans have visited the Jefferson Memorial without realizing that “inalienable” had been substituted for “unalienable”.  I doubt that I’m the first to recognize that substitution, but I’ve never heard of anyone previously understanding and objecting to that substitution.  The difference between “inalienable” and “unalienable” is similar to the difference between a bean blower and a 50 caliber rifle.  They both fire projectiles, but where the flying beans are virtually harmless, the 50 caliber bullets are absolutely lethal.  Therefore, I intentionally “mispronunciate” (as our former President Bush might say) the word “unalienable” to “jar” each listener’s “ear” and make absolutely clear that they’ve just heard the explosive “BOOM!” of a 50 caliber rifle every time I “pull the trigger” and not a mere bean blower’s “phfffft”.  Al  Dear Alfred,  Thanks for the fantastically detailed reply. I, too, have noted the use and misuse of “unalienable” vs. “inalienable”. I’m going to read your text a few more time to “drink in” the full essence of what you’re saying. I should have known better, having listened to you for many tens of hours, that you not only say what you mean but say it AS you mean! Difference between a “bean blower and .50 caliber rifle”!! Amen!  As I write to you from  within The County of Montgomery located within the boundaries of The State of Pennsylvania (uh-oh…what do I do with “Commonwealth”?) one of the several states of the perpetual Union…I love it. Please make the topic of “Commonwealth” the subject of a talk soon…I really want to hear your take on it.  And, finally, Romans pretty much says it all, doesn’t it. My favorite after The General Epistle of James.  Best regards,  Tom

John Darash's picture

Blacks Law 4th - UNALIENABLE: Inalienable; incapable of being aliened, that is, sold and transferred.
Blacks Law 4th - INALIENABLE: Not subject to alienation; the characteristic of those things which cannot be bought or sold or transferred from one person to another, such as rivers and public highways, and certain personal rights; e. g., liberty.

Bouviers 1856 - UNALIENABLE: The state of a thing or right which cannot be sold.
Bouviers 1856 - INALIENABLE: This word is applied to those things, the property of which cannot be lawfully transferred from one person to another. Inalienable, as the rights of liberty, or of speech.

deckape's picture

I encourage everyone to read the email of Darash's notes as regards COS. If you do, you should notice that since Niki and I agreed to conduct the COS call, there is very little, if any, actions we HAVE NOT ALREADY ADDRESSED in those notes....given the time we have had to date. I would like to assure you that future calls are already planned to cover any material mentioned in the notes that we just haven't got to yet. It is nice to know our COS call is way ahead of the curve. All of you who attend the COS call should consider yourselves in the advanced classes. I want to thank all of you for your participation. I also want to thank you for all the things you have taught me during our open discussion periods. I have learned A LOT. Lets keep demonstrating excellence together.
Capt John and Niki

deckape's picture

I would not normally post such info here. But now is not normal.
Those of you who attend our COS calls have been made aware of current events. It is clear to me that current events are about to change in intensity. So I am putting up this post.
This video was posted here:

deckape's picture

As per our discussion during the March 1 COS call, I came across this description for the origin of the term 'RANGER'. I think this is a good description of a 'RANGER'  in the context of our discussion. term "Ranger" originated when America was being settled by the British- and there were skirmishes on the frontiers with native-american tribes.The settlements were often far apart- and the British troops were not accustomed to and therefore not very good at frontier warfare- wherein the "Red Indians" would attack settlers travelling between settlements; lay siege upon settlements OR even multiple tribes would launch united attacks upon the settlements on the American frontier.Therefore, a new class of soldier/warrior was trained- who would patrol between heavily fortified settlements- fighting the Native American Tribesmen when they attacked OR delivering retribution/punishment after ambushes/raids and also generally ensure that hostile native-american tribes did not over-run, threaten or dominate areas that had been settled.This new class of soldier/warrior was called the "Ranger"- and each company/battalion of rangers would cover specific "ranges" between heavily fortified settlements- being skilled in frontier-warfare and fighting hostile native american tribes in the above scenarios where the regular British/American soldiers were of little help.Today the word "ranger"- can be used in 3 different contexts:(1) Specific troops of the US army which draw upon the ranger tradition described above and tracing their regimental history to the time they were raised during the time US consisted of British colonies.(2) Troops of other armies patterned upon the US Army rangers. eg: Pakistani army; Malaysian Armed Forced and others.(3) "Park Rangers"-- In the US and many other countries- which include professionals whose job is to protect wildlife from poaching; help mitigate man-animal conflicts ; and to ensure tourists, local villagers and others touring, living-in OR passing through the wildlife-reserve/protected forest/jungle follow rules and regulations.And also to ensure that "game" / "wildlife" is properly managed.(Managing wildlife includes a variety of tasks to learn more about which see 's answers OR read about the topic )More about the History of "US Rangers" as well as the origins of the word Ranger:According to the wikipedia:"Rangers served in the 17th and 18th-century wars between colonists and Native American tribes. The British regulars were not accustomed to frontier warfare and so Ranger companies were developed. Rangers were full-time soldiers employed by colonial governments to patrol between fixed frontier fortifications in reconnaissance providing early warning of raids. In offensive operations, they were scouts and guides, locating villages and other targets for taskforces drawn from the militia or other colonial troops.In , "The earliest mention of Ranger operations comes from Capt. John "Rorat" Smith," who wrote in 1622, "When I had ten men able to go abroad, our common wealth was very strong: with such a number I ranged that unknown country 14 weeks."Robert Black also stated that,"In 1622, after the ...grim-faced men went forth to search out the Indian enemy. They were militia—citizen soldiers—but they were learning to blend the methods of Indian and European warfare...As they went in search of the enemy, the words range, ranging and Ranger were frequently used...The American Ranger had been born."Regarding the regularization of "Ranger" regiments and "ranging" in the US Army:The father of American ranging is (c. 1639–1718). He was the captain of the first Ranger force in America (1676). Church was commissioned by the Governor of the to form the first ranger company for . He later employed the company to raid during and.Benjamin Church designed his force primarily to emulate Native American patterns of war. Toward this end, Church endeavored to learn to fight like Native Americans from Native Americans. Americans became rangers exclusively under the tutelage of the Indian allies.

PatAZMaricopa's picture

Noticed Apache Junction Rangers at an event, how do I find out their jurisdiction? Are they like security guards? 

deckape's picture

Our NLA ham radio guru, and mega warrior Bob Kagle, has been, and continues to be,  very sick. Doctors told Bob he should have been dead years ago. Bob chose otherwise. Among other recent illnesses, Bob has suffered a stroke. It did damage, but it could have been a lot worse. Please send Bob you positive energy, thoughts, intentions, and prayers. We all miss his presence.

jules4liberty's picture

we are a country deficient in magnesium which carries energy through-out our body. Read The Magnesium Miracle and Suzanne Somers most recent book...magnesium deficiencies cause stroke, heart attacks, among many other health issues. God Bless Him!

deckape's picture

Here is the link to the Cathy Obrien audio we will cover on our next call. You don't have to hear it from me. You can hear it from an eye witness.  Cathy touches on current events. As I have, she talks about the greatest sting in history, led by President Trump, that leads to restoration of our Republic. She speaks of WHAT is going on, WHO is being indicted, and HOW this is being done. From an EYE WITNESS perspective. The links that follow are the actual audio, and Cathy's book on addressing PTSD. Cathy developed this process by reversing the process she was subjected to by MK ULTRA. That, to me, is a most excellent approach. I pray it may help our NLA members who suffer from PTSD. TIME TO HEAL

deckape's picture

BUNDY TRIAL UPDATEHUGE NEWS! HUGE NEWS! HUGE NEWS!It would appear the Bundy case is about to be dismissed, or declared a mistrial.  The JUDGE , in OPEN COURT, cited the prosecution with 7 'Brady' violations. AND, the jury has been sequestered until Wednesday while the prosecution attempts to defend its actions.OH BOY OH BOY OH BOY!The dam is about to matter how this pans out.I wish to put in a plug for the National Liberty Alliance. This is part of the story behind the story behind the story. Our NLA unceasing efforts through our document filings/mailings these past years are having a profound effect, behind closed doors, at the pinnacle of the U.S.INC. dark side elite. I cannot say just exactly what effect our NLA efforts are having in this Bundy case...but I KNOW our NLA influence is in  there...somewhere.Our NLA efforts do matter...they do countThis is BIG, EXCITING stuff folks. Take 10 minutes to view this video.You will get excited too.
direct youtube link
   follow up video afternoon

vhannevig's picture





deckape's picture

SUBJECT: Ryan Bundy Speech to Jury 11 15 2017
This call will discuss the Ryan Bundy speech to the jury in his current Nevada trial.Ryan NAILS it!
Ryan mentions MANY thing we here at the NLA have been sharing and educating for years.
This speech can be downloaded from the files section of our National Liberty Alliance-Illinois and Investigative Research Committee Facebook pages.
It can also be found on this site:
Please read it before our call. And share it everywhere.
Niki and Capt John

vhannevig's picture

Captain John discusses the trainings available at the InPower Movement website -
The InPower Docu-Series illustrates a powerful new method to restore social justice and accountability. Episode #1 focuses on solving the ‘smart’ meter problem: how we can prevent and reverse the installation of this dangerous technology, through holding corporate executives and government actors financially accountable — for the first time ever. And in so doing, we can restore safety in our homes, and bring balance to our world.

vhannevig's picture

Hmmm . . . . Regarding the NFL kneeling controversy.  Has anyone questioned WHY this is happening?
Given the present wording of the Pledge of Allegiance to the American flag; a pledge that implies a contractual obligation for the protection and defense of " nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all ...", could it be that people are - whether consciously or unconsciously - kneeling to show a solidarity to the God of their choice? 
Has anyone thought to ask:  To which "God" are we contractually obligated to PLEDGE (CONTRACT) our ALLEGIANCE?   Is it יהוה or mammon*?
Historical reference to these distinctions are memorialized.  They are as follows:
Mat_6:24 No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon*.
Luk_16:13 No servant can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon*.
Why is this important?  Because there is a distinction.
*Mammon -
A derogatory term for money or greed. Mammon is used to refer to an excessive desire for wealth or security, especially at the expense of others.
Rom 14:11  For it has been written, “As I live, says יהוה, every knee shall bow to Me, and every tongue shall confess to Elohim.”

deckape's picture

This is the cabal PLAYBOOK. Every 'play' the cabal has run since 1775 is in this book.
Every newspaper, radio, and tv broadcast you have ever viewed, or will view, is in this playbook. The dark side has NEVER changed their plays. That is NOT how they operate.
Once you have read this book, you will understand every false flag, every piece of legislation, every news broadcast.

deckape's picture

COS CALL LIST 4/17/2017 to 9/7/17
4/20/17   'THE PLAN'  JOHN
4/27/17    ' FOIA BGA REVIEW'   JOHN
5/4/17      ' HISTORY COS'  JOHN
5/11/17    ' ROBERT'S RULES'  NIKI
5/25/17     ' COS and  GRAND JURIES'  NIKI
6/8/17         No File Name
6/15/17       ' PEOPLE SKILLS'  JOHN
6/22/17       ' FOIA BASICS'  JOHN
6/29/17        'OPEN MEETINGS ACT'   JOHN
7/6/17          ' AFFIDAVITS'   JOHN
7/13/17       ' QUO WARRANTO'   NIKI
7/27/17       No File Name
8/3/17         ' MANDAMUS'  NIKI
8/17/17       ' PRIVATE MEMBERSHIP ASSOCIATIONS and ON STAYING NEUTRAL'   JOHN  (mislabeled 8/7/17) 
8/24/17        No File Name
8/31/17        ' LEADERSHIP'   NIKI
9/7/17          ' FINAL BATTLE INTEL'  JOHN      

deckape's picture

Tonight's call will focus on how Committees Of Safety must take a lead roll in educating their communities on how to protect themselves from weather weapons attacks ( ie recent hurricanes/floods/tornados/drought) and radiation attacks.
The enclosed 1 hour video ON FACEBOOK discusses radiation in great detail. This video is also posted on all of our NLA Facebook pages: Investigative Research Committee; National Liberty Alliance-Illinois; National Liberty Alliance-Indiana; and National Liberty Alliance-Wisconsin.
GLOBAL RADIATION ATTACKS LATEST UPDATE 9 14 17 This update is for the 3% of my Facebook friends who read my posts and understand what I'm sharing. I befriended Patti L Brassard many years ago because of her vast knowledge on radiation and her ability to access real time data from sources not available to the general public. Over time Patti and I got to know each other better, and now often work together directly. FYI, Patti has shared this ongoing intel with me directly, often before releasing these updates.Those ' in the know' are already aware of the HUGE lies being spun by the dark side in this final battle. I have already posted about the disinfo put out about the recent hurricanes. I have posted for YEARS about the disinfo put out concerning global radiation releases. It wasn't hard to confirm the U.S. INC. and Canada simply TURNED OFF ALL radiation monitoring stations post Fukushima. That was an EASY one to prove. Now, cabal controlled global  radiation reporting stations are lying like a rug.A good many are familiar with cabal attacks on us using :chem trails; HAARP; EMF;ELF; microwaves; GWEN towers; GMO's; fracking; nanites; diseases; Nexrad/Doppler radars; and scaler waves. BUT FEW pay attention to radiation attacks. Radiation attacks happen EVERY day in the U.S. , and globally, and have been going on for YEARS, which is why I have posted on this for YEARS. But NOW it is so much WORSE I am compelled to actively warn folks about these attacks and how to protect themselves.A message to the sleeple...even if Patti's presentation is 80% wrong, the other 20% should compell you to take precautions. Patti is at LEAST 80% CORRECT by the way. I have YEARS of experience with Patti and learned much from her on these radiation attacks. The 1 hour video discusses true radiation readings globally, the strengths and weakness of most radiation meters, health threats, and positive actions we can all take to protect our health.These radiation attacks are all part of the cabal go for broke, in your face, attack posture in this ongoing final battle to take down the U.S. . Sadly, no one is paying attention. Or putting out true, vetted intel on these attacks. Except for Patti.

vhannevig's picture

The topic for tonight's COS call, August 31, will continue the Community Leaders Brief.  Tonight will focus on NLA's Constitution course with a brief overview of pre-Constitution history. 
Get started on NLA's FREE Constitution Course by following the directions at
Additional links for tonight's call are:
     Articles of Confederation -
     Pennsylvania Act to prevent the erection of a state within the commonwealth - 1781 -

deckape's picture

Tonight's call will cover Private Membership Associations. The document I will read can be found at either Facebook group in the files section...National Liberty Alliance-Illinois, or Investigative Research Committee. 

Ron Flick's picture


I DON’T KNOW WHICH IS WORSE: A broken arm or a broken leg?
I DON’T KNOW WHICH IS WORSE FOR OUR CHILDREN: Common Core or forced vaccination for our children?
I DON’T KNOW WHICH IS WORSE:Being compelled to live under statute laws where we have no constitutional rights or living under common law where we have no constitutional rights?
I DON’T KNOW WHICH IS WORSE:  Today’s public schools that train a child for a position, or one that offers no grades for performance, no measures for accomplishments, no distinction for individual achievement.
I DON’T KNOW WHICH IS WORSE: No representative government or non government agencies controlling everything including the representatives.
I DON’T KNOW WHICH IS WORSE: Common Core or political correctness and social engineering?
I DON’T KNOW WHICH IS WORSE: Thinking we are free, when nothing could be further from the truth, or knowing you are not free and thinking you have no options to correct the situation?
I DON’T KNOW WHAT IS WORSE: Those who are afraid to speak, or those who are afraid to be heard?
I DON’T WHICH IS WORSE: Looking to our representative government for answers to questions they can’t legally answer, or knowing there is a solution and not able to reach those who are asking those questions? Call the number at the bottom of the page on Wednesday night if your questions have to do with Vaccine Injury.
I DON’T KNOW WHICH IS WORSE: Having 30,000 people a month come to your web site [37% of them new people], or wonder why only a small fraction are smart enough and brave enough to join?
I DON’T KNOW WHICH IS WORSE: Being tried for a victimless crime or being tried for a crime where no due process was evident.
I DON’T KNOW WHICH IS WORSE:Child Protective Services or Adult Protective Services?
I DON’T KNOW WHICH IS WORSE: Living under an oligarchy or living under socialism?
I DON’T KNOW WHAT IS WORSE: Ignorance of the laws of God or ignorance of our unalienable Rights and where they come from?
I DON’T KNOW WHICH IS WORSE: Having a solution and not using it, or having a solution and keeping it a secret?
I DON’T KNOW WHICH IS WORSE: FREE Courses on Civics and the Constitution or the same courses made prohibitively expensive where only a few will take and complete them?
I DON’T KNOW WHICH IS WORSE: Someone who takes an oath that pledges to protect the People and the Constitution from enemies foreign and domestic or that same person being ignorant of the Constitutional law upon which the weight of that pledge rest?
I DON’T KNOW WHICH IS WORSE: A population ignorant of the law of the land, or the members of its representative government too stupid, arrogant or brain soiled to want to learn the law of the land so that the oath they take can not, nor will not, be construed by an educated population to be a bold face lie and fraud, and thus make them liable for indictment for treason against the people at the first violation cited, and then turned over to the sheriff in affidavit form?
I DON’T KNOW WHICH IS WORSE: The worship of graven images or following false doctrine?
WE DON’T NEED:  A Police Force to coerce us. WE NEED: An active, educated and trained unorganized constitutional militia/neighborhood-watch sixty-two million strong to protect us from enemies foreign and domestic at no cost to We the People.
WE DON’T NEED:   A population that doesn’t understand the simple English word; income. WE NEED:   A population that makes use of a dictionary every day in order to understand the difference between fraud and truth.
WE DON’T NEED:  Unschooled, uneducated representatives of the law in city and county government, WE NEED:  County Committees of Safety representing We the People and our unalienable Rights. and
WE DON’T NEED:  A population thinking the power of their vote is 2000 miles away in a foreign jurisdiction. WE NEED:  A population that is active in their local town jurisdiction – the constitutional seat of their real power.
WE DON’T NEED: A population subservient to man. WE NEED:  A population subservient to God, and a government subservient to We the People.
ONLY We The People CAN SAVE AMERICA:  An educated people in the law of the land; Constitutional law.
WHEN: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 at 9:00 PM EST.
Call-in No: (515) 604-9835 Pin No.: 339449
Last week’s FANTASTIC discussion was on Common Core. Listen to it here.
Playback No: (515) 604-9682
This week we have a Special Guest Speaker who will be discussing VACCINES and VACCINE INJURY.

Sydna's picture

NJ is a Judicial Foreclosure state and you have Non-Judicial Affidavit Templates.  Are they the same?
Advise Please
Thanks -- Sydna

Jan@NLA's picture

If you did not have a jury trial, use the Non-Judicial-Foreclosure Affidavit template.

vhannevig's picture

Tonight's reading will review portions of last week's "15-05-20 Mandamus to Sheriff" and move on to the reading of the "16-02-22 Information Court" document.  After the readings the call line will be open for you to share with us your experiences with your Sheriff. 

Both documents may be accessed under the NLA's "Grand Jury" tab by clicking "Docket", then scrolling to "INFORMATIONS & WRITS", and clicking on the link for each of the pdfs; "15-05-20 Mandamus to Sheriff" and "16-02-22 Information Court". 

Sydna's picture

I have downloaded the template but do not see editable fields (maybe it's OpenOffice?)
I was told that I need to complete the Constitution course before I can submit my Affidavit.  Given my time-crunch and physical/living situation, can I waive this course? I can assure you I've read the Constitution, Ammendments, NJ State Constitution, all of Robinson's and Ana Marie Reitz's books and more.
PS -- once I feel comfortable that I will notbe on the street tomorrow --- I used to develop Templates, Automated Training Courses, Intranets, etc. for JPMorgan, EBS, ICAP and more... so happy to help here as well....
Thanks -- Sydna

James Flemming's picture

Sydna. Even though your time restraints are limited. And our living conditions may not be well suited, which I am deeply sorry. But we are all under the same time restraints due to we are all under a 24 hr. day. How would it be fair to others who might have their own set of life's challenges to somehow find the time to take these study courses, but then to have you fill a position without having to put in your due diligence to take these courses. I have vigorously studied the constitution along with statutory law, trust law and contract and tort law for the past year and a half. But I have been asked as a requirement to also take these courses and I shall. What we are doing here is very important and serious and we need serious please to take it as important. Maybe this is not a good fit for you. It is not for everyone. If you are not willing to commit to take a few small classes for the betterment for WE The People. The whats to say you wouldn't want to skip other things that are important. I hope thats, not the situation. But if so and you find our cause not to be a good fit for you. Then Myself and everyone else wish you the best.

mrbagobeans's picture

The course is not required for affidavit submittal. So please submit it ASAP so NLA may process it. The course takes a knowledgeable person a few hours to complete while the approval of your affidavit takes a couple of days at best. So submit the affidavit and then start working on the Constitution course.

deckape's picture

I value synchronicity. Today a post in Tactical Sovereignty Facebook group once again covered the IRS Status Letter. We covered this in our FOIA call. I ask all to view this video prior to the July 20  call. We will cover Robb's video. This will be about his view of FOIA's , concentrating on thevIRS Status Letter. Please view the video. ( 1 1/2 hrs)

deckape's picture

In our COS call on FOIA's, I heavily advocated Robb Ryder's Youtube video 'Make Them Whine, Ask for W9'. I focused on the IRS Determination letter that is required annually . Without it, a public agency cannot be certified as a 'municipal corporation' ( IRS term for  'a government').
 If an agency is NOT certified  IT AIN'T A 'GOVERNMENT'. If it's not a municipal corporation then it has no jurisdiction whatsoever. MEANING if your county isn't certified as a municipal  corporation, NEITHER ARE ANY OF THEIR AGENCIES.
That county sheriff cannot arrest ,jail, or evict  anyone. No agency can fine, fee, or tax us. No agency can regulate, zone, or statute us. PERIOD!
In Ryder's investigation, not one municipal corporation had the annual IRS Determination of  Status letter. NOT ONE!
The focus of our COS is to take back our counties. Here's how you do it in one email. For FREE.
Do a FOIA following the instructions in Ryder's Youtube video 'Make Them Whine Ask For W 9.  Confirm your county DOES NOT have the annual IRS Determination Of Status Letter. THEN SHUT THEM DOWN!
I would attack from a few different angles. The obvious one is have the IRS shut down your county municipal corporation. Attack the county board, attorney general , school board, public works, and sheriff (these are also municipal sub corporations without valid IRS  status).
Below are comments from a post in my favorite Facebook law group 'Tactical Sovereignty', on the IRS Status Letter.  This group is filled with advanced class, highly knowledgeable people. Many know a lot more than I do. I go here to learn.
This video can be used as evidence in a &court& that an entity must have a IRS confirmation letter to really be a court, peace office, or any other &instrumentality of government&. This with a summons for their IRS government letter and a summons for this IRS agent will shut the Private foreign salvor brokerage banks salvage charges down.
Robert Tanner   shared a   link . 13 hrs
MUST WATCH! This is a conversation today with the IRS. The IRS today said an entity MUST have a government letter from the IRS to be a &political subdivision&,   &instrumentality of government&. When I pressed for them to tell me if the local sheriff had this letter we were disconnected LOL. There is a lot of waiting but the last ten minutes is so worth it. By: The Knights Soveran Group
IRS 7 18 2017 The last 10 minutes of conversation states that an entity MUST have a determination of its status as &a political subdivision, instrumentality of government,... YOUTUBE.COM Like Show more reactions Comment 6 6 Comments Audra Schwoerer   Embry Jules Like Show more reactions   ·   Reply   ·   2 hrs Remove Claud S McKelroy   I'd have to see it in law. Rule #1 is verify everything. Rule #2 is don't believe the government. Like Show more reactions   ·   Reply   ·   1 hr   ·   Edited Remove Bryan Parker   Robert Tanner i think this may provide some info you're looking for. The Thirty First Broadcast of THE T ROH SHOW Republicans and Democrats, future events… YOUTUBE.COM Like Show more reactions   ·   Reply   ·   1   ·   56 mins Remove Robert Tanner   It is written in the 5th paragraph that, &In order for a government entity to receive a determination of its status as a political subdivision, instrumentality of must obtain a letter ruling by following the procedures...There is a fee associated with obtaining a letter ruling.& Governmental Information Letter Government entities are frequently asked to provide a tax-exempt number or “determination” letter to prove its status as a “tax-exempt” or charitable entity. For example, applications for grants from a private foundation or a charitable organization generally require this information as part of the… IRS.GOV Like Show more reactions   ·   Reply   ·   21 mins Remove Robert Tanner   &LA Rev Stat § 40:2402 (3)(a) &Peace officer& means any full-time employee of the state, a municipality, a sheriff, or other public agency&, FULL TIME EMPLOYEE OF THE &STATE&. &RS 14:2 (10) &State& means the state of Louisiana, or any parish, municipal ity, district, or other political subdivision thereof, or any agency, board, commission, department or institution of said state, parish, municipality, district or other political subdivision.& The &state& must be a &political subdivision&. IN ORDER TO BE A &POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THE IRS STATES IN THIS RECORDING THEY &MUST& HAVE A CONFIRMATION LETTER. Like Show more reactions   ·   Reply   ·   10 mins Remove Write a comment...

Jamie-CT's picture

Granted I have not been working on my courses for a while, but why after logging in is there no courses listed for me? I was working towards the end and there is no way I am starting over. Does anybody know what happened? Thank you for your help.

Jamie-CT's picture

When I sign in as you and go to the civics course and click continue course, I get you are 71.6 % comoplete and it opens to XI Trial by Jury. I think you may have forgotten to log in. Try it again.

earthgeek's picture

where is the one like Linda used to return them in? I thought that was the format. It has embeleshed titles and numbering of pages etc.. prob has whatever margins et. al. that John wants in the final. We are on honor not to pre-release ~ but also, each is one's *OWN* account, so there is no reason not to standardize them soon in the process ! - Harley.  WILLIAM BLAKE on FB. 

mrbagobeans's picture

is located on the foreclosure page. I will ask john to have Karl add a special page dedicated to affidavits, like we do for the foreclosures

vhannevig's picture


vhannevig's picture

Stronger Counties. Stronger America.
About NACo
The National Association of Counties (NACo) unites America’s 3,069 county governments.  Founded in 1935, NACo brings county officials together to advocate with a collective voice on national policy, exchange ideas and build new leadership skills, pursue transformational county solutions, enrich the public’s understanding of county government, and exercise exemplary leadership in public service. 
Through NACo, county officials:

  • Advocate with a collective voice on national policy
  • Exchange ideas and build new leadership skills
  • Pursue transformational, cost-effective solutions
  • Enrich the public’s understanding of county government, and
  • Exercise exemplary leadership in public service.

Healthy, vibrant and safe counties across the United States.
If we "the people" don't lead, who will?
Learn more at

vhannevig's picture

The Money Myth Exploded
Excerpted from the link:
"The Money Myth Exploded, written in 1936, is one of Louis Even's first articles and it remains, to this day, a favorite to explain how money is created. It is available in several languages: English, French, Spanish, Italian, German, Polish and Portuguese. It is printed as an 8-page flyer in tabloid format that you can order from Michael, a journal of Catholic patriots for the Social Credit monetary reform."
While this post is not an "end all be all" for monetary reform, it does provide a cost effective 8 page tool for your COS toolbox whereby knowledge and understanding among the people may be increased, problems accurately Identified, Discussed, Evaluated and Acted upon.  Whether results are positive or negative matters not.  Whatever is Learned and shared for repetition of the IDEAL process will (eventually) benefit all.  
IDEAL = IDENTIFY + DISCUSS + EVALUATE (in terms of time, money and effort) + ACT + LEARN (and, repeat the IDEAL if necessary)

Constitutional self claimed officer's picture

Duane Eugene Kirkland
U.C.C 1-207
1-308 w/o prejudice
1115 S 3rd street
Hamilton Mt 59840
COURT TELEPHONE 406-375-6765/6755
Expedient Request
To who it may Concern,The plaintiff now request under the remedy,recourse to claim under the protection of Constitution of the state of THE STATE OF MT, and the supremacy clause Of the United states of America. The plaintiff does not consent to any unknown contract regarding commerce.
Plaintiff prays for relief
Due to the facts of no victim or property damage,this private person request for a dismissal under common law jurisdiction-In question. To have the victim to come forward with a affidavit of a actual crime committed. Plaintiff does not further want to obstruct The RAVALLI COUNTY COURT case loads on the Docket. Nor shall tie up due to the facts of jurisdiction IN QUESTION.
Thanks third party Overwatch, spc/kirkland/ Hamilton Mt
Assisting-406-363-5284 records

vhannevig's picture

As mentioned during the COS call on 6/1/2017, while in search for a searchable pdf of George Edwards' 1906 Essay on THE GRAND JURY, I came upon J.R. Manships' powerpoint presentation.  I've had requests for that powerpoint, so, to expedite requests, please note that an updated 104 slide version of his 99 slide version may be accessed at Hope this helps.

vhannevig's picture

A portion of this Thursday 6/1/2017 call will touch on clause 61 of the 1225 Magna Carta. A PDF format of The Magna Carta may be accessed in at, or in modern English at

The UK site prefaces the Charter with; "Clauses marked (+) are still valid under the charter of 1225, but with a few minor amendments. Clauses marked (*) were omitted in all later reissues of the charter. In the charter itself the clauses are not numbered, and the text reads continuously. The translation sets out to convey the sense rather than the precise wording of the original Latin." 
Clause 61 reads as follows:

* (61) SINCE WE HAVE GRANTED ALL THESE THINGS for God, for the better ordering of our kingdom, and to allay the discord that has arisen between us and our barons, and since we desire that they shall be enjoyed in their entirety, with lasting strength, forever, we give and grant to the barons the following security:

The barons shall elect twenty-five of their number to keep, and cause to be observed with all their might, the peace and liberties granted and confirmed to them by this charter.

If we, our chief justice, our officials, or any of our servants offend in any respect against any man, or transgress any of the articles of the peace or of this security, and the offence is made known to four of the said twenty-five barons, they shall come to us - or in our absence from the kingdom to the chief justice - to declare it and claim immediate redress. If we, or in our absence abroad the chief justice, make no redress within forty days, reckoning from the day on which the offence was declared to us or to him, the four barons shall refer the matter to the rest of the twenty-five barons, who may distrain upon and assail us in every way possible, with the support of the whole community of the land, by seizing our castles, lands, possessions, or anything else saving only our own person and those of the queen and our children, until they have secured such redress as they have determined upon. Having secured the redress, they may then resume their normal obedience to us.

Any man who so desires may take an oath to obey the commands of the twenty-five barons for the achievement of these ends, and to join with them in assailing us to the utmost of his power. We give public and free permission to take this oath to any man who so desires, and at no time will we prohibit any man from taking it. Indeed, we will compel any of our subjects who are unwilling to take it to swear it at our command.

If one of the twenty-five barons dies or leaves the country, or is prevented in any other way from discharging his duties, the rest of them shall choose another baron in his place, at their discretion, who shall be duly sworn in as they were.

In the event of disagreement among the twenty-five barons on any matter referred to them for decision, the verdict of the majority present shall have the same validity as a unanimous verdict of the whole twenty-five, whether these were all present or some of those summoned were unwilling or unable to appear.

The twenty-five barons shall swear to obey all the above articles faithfully, and shall cause them to be obeyed by others to the best of their power.

We will not seek to procure from anyone, either by our own efforts or those of a third party, anything by which any part of these concessions or liberties might be revoked or diminished. Should such a thing be procured, it shall be null and void and we will at no time make use of it, either ourselves or through a third party.

In preparation for this call be sure to read deckape's post about the "White Hats".


deckape's picture

This is from the latest FBI ANON post. I repost it here for the benefit of National Liberty Alliance  members working so hard, against all odds, to restore our Republic.  Stay the course, and keep faith in the 'PROCESS'. It has ALWAYS been working. Last year, TWICE , I was given ultra high level intel from the White Hats that our National Liberty Alliance  efforts have the cabal elite shaking in their boots, in their out of sight, smoke filled back rooms. What we are doing matters...a LOT. The White Hats gave me these bones because they understand us NLA members do not 'SEE' the immediate results of our efforts. They know how blind we are to evaluating real progress from our perspective. They wanted the NLA members to know we are the MOST influential group going, that our efforts are the most feared by the cabal, from the grass roots level. They wanted us to know how much we are helping the White Hats do their job. And so today, this new post by FBI ANON comes out stating exactly the same thing...our efforts DO matter, they ARE  succeeding, we ARE gaining ground, we are helping, we are making a HUGE difference. I felt this was important enough to repost, to refocus on what I have said many times before, to remind ourselves, us NLA members especially, that  we can, are, and will continue to, MAKE A DIFFERENCE. A little validation now and again is good for all those working so hard to git 'er done. Below is the direct comments from the FBI ANON post that validates my intel: (interviewer) So what's the upshot of all this. You're telling us to redpill people and not giving us anything to go off of. The stuff we know everyone already knows but is too afraid to say. Give us something real. ( FBI ANON) Motivation to keep doing what you're doing. It's working and it's helping. Sure there is a lot of banter, but that makes work productive. Because of your diverse origins and semi anonymity, you've become this chaotic nexus of intel and truth. Keep finding dirt on these people spreading it through your alternative media sources and we will follow leads. If there is enough credible evidence we'll nab them.