Court Access Without a Lawyer Course

NEED HELP IN THE COURTS?

Because you are on this web site chances are that you already know that the courts are corrupt and BAR lawyers cannot help you. So, the only solution is to go to court and fight them yourself.

If you are like most people this seems like an overwhelming task considering that you did not go to law school and the courts do not provide a guide to assist you with the forms for filing an action.

Therefore, I will cut to the chase and give you all the necessary tools and information necessary to be able to defend yourself. If you really buckle down you can be filing your own papers in 30 days and have a good understanding of how things work and how to beat them at their own game in about 3 months.

There are 4 courses that you will need to take and a few basic mind sets. All but one of the courses is free, but you need to take them all to get a good rounded appreciation on writing, fighting and winning.

It is my strong suggestion that you take these course in the order I am suggesting for pre-prerequisite reasons.

  • COURSE #1 Jurisdictionary - Shows you step-by-step with forms and examples how to file papers and how to respond to the opposing parties papers. This course cost $249 and claims that you can achieve the knowledge within 24 hours. I took this course and was able to understand the paperwork process and filings over a week end (24 hours). To this day I reference back to Jurisdictionary forms from time to time. [some of the strategies and procedures in this course do not take the Common Law into account and will be corrected in proceeding courses] CLICK HERE to take this course. NLA earns $50 - $125 for each referral which helps to keep NLA going.

  • COURSE # 2 Constitutional Course CLICK HERE to take this FREE course. This course will give you a fundamental understanding of the Constitution necessary to fight any court case. This course can be completed in less than 8 hours.

  • COURSE # 3 Civics CourseCLICK HERE to take this FREE course. This course will give you a fundamental understanding of Common Law and American History necessary to fight any court case. This course can be done in 120 hours. You can find videos and mp3 copies for download on our site. [Major correction: Bill Thorton teaches that you are the king of the court, the fact is: “God is the King of the court”; His will is to be done by the tribunal, a/k/a Kings Bench that we call the untainted petit or trial jury]

  • COURSE # 4 Writing Powerful PapersCLICK HERE. Read all these papers and cut and paste anything useful for your case. This will also give you an understanding of NLA's work in the court. Also CLICK HERE to read “Landmark Supreme Court Cases”.

MIND SET ask yourself the following questions as you proceed, [without taking the courses above you may not be able to answer or understand the following points].

  1. Am I getting due process?
  2. Am I in a court of record?
  3. Is the court acting under the color of law?
  4. Are all my unalienable rights protected under the Bill of Rights being acknowledged by the court.

Join our Court Observers Group - https://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/join-courtroom-observer-group

Meanwhile if you are facing a tax or mortgage foreclosure we can file papers for you CLICK HERE for help. Also, if your unalienable rights have been violated you can file an affidavit in our Federal Subversion Case.

Finally, CLICK HERE for details to join our Weekly Conference Calls to ask questions and get some direction.


Comments

deckape's picture

4 PM CDT
Our trusted NLA state coordinator in Oregon, Robert Bristow, and his son Randy, are under attack by rogue deputies and cops. They have made it clear they wish to kill Robert and his son. These pricks are NOT officially authorized to be there...according to the sheriff. We have an eyewitness to a conversation where killing Robert and his son were discussed. If I can get thru to Robert, I'll get phone numbers to call.
He is in very serious danger. Robert posted a video of the rogue cops near his home. I reposted it on National Liberty Alliance-Illinois Facebook page.
6 PM CDT
I called Columbia County Sheriff dispatch and asked for a welfare check. Almost as soon as I finished the call these unauthorized deputies from Washington and Columbia counties dispersed...as if they were somehow tipped off. Their respective departments attempted to contact these deputies but got no response from these on duty deputies.
Altho it took an abnormally long time, a ( I believe) Columbia County sheriff deputy did finally arrive and started making a report. I was monitoring most of this process via speakerphone until I got cut off.
This has been an ongoing problem, the threats to kill Robert Bristow and his son are real. A local judge has taken a positive interest in this problem, and found in favor of Robert in a case of false accusations by one of these rogue deputies.
The new local DA has purged 47 officers recently from local pd and sheriff forces.
There is progress, there are positive aspects, but these rogue deputies continue to make unauthorized entry to Robert's property with rifles visible. Robert has a new security camera system, but was unfamiliar with its operation at the time the deputy arrived.
The responding deputy was getting quasi confrontational with Robert and his son because they were having difficulty bringing up, and displaying the video surveillance footage of these rogue officers on property bearing rifles. The responding deputy also was overly fixated on an ID Robert's son wears only on property, that is legal, and already verified and approved of, and supported by the local judge.
It was at this point the call dropped.
I will wait a while for them to finish up with the responding deputy and call back.
The number for Columbia County Sheriff dispatch is 503-366-4611. The house does not have a house number but is located on Sam Blehm Road, Scappoose, Oregon, 97056.
All that can be done has been done ATM, I think. However, I may request a phone bomb of the Columbia County Sheriff department , on short notice, in the future. Please stay vigilant in this matter.
The threats are very real from these rogue thug deputies.
This incursion happened now, I believe, because the judge is on vacation until after the holidays. When the cat's away...the mice will play.
7 PM CDT
Update...it gets worse. Somebody got to the responding deputy. He left and returned with 2 Scappoose PD. They arrested Robert's son Randy, who is mentally disabled, for misuse of 911 and making false claims....because it would takes hours to download megabytes of security footage to find the relevant footage showing the rogue deputies with rifles in the back yard.
Robert cannot go bail Randy out because the rogue deputies will ambush and kill him. We fear for his safety.
Start calling the sheriff department. Tell them you are monitoring the safety of Randy.

Ginger's picture

Good Morning Deckape,
Just picking up! Is the phone 503-366-4611 to call regarding monitoring Randy's safety? Would recommend calling media. Starting a Fo Fund Me for getting the word out through social media. Have requested to join FB. Prayerfully asking Mat 18:19 agreement that this battle belongs to the Lord it SHALL BE DONE of our victorious Father in heaven!!
In Loving Kindness,
Ginger

officerkirkland's picture

1/5 {Treason by sedition complaint}TO THE OFFICE OF THE HEAD * TRUMP ADMINISTRATION\INSTITUTIONS IN HARMONY/{special unit- for treason of inferior courts}{Title 18 US Code Section 2381 241 242 1628 2183}Dwane Eugene KirklandUCC 1-207 1-308 w/o Prejudicebill of rights advocate /witness/self claimedConstitutional officer.Investigator/750 5TH AVE WEST 1VICTOR MT 59875406-363-5284/406-369-0482officerkirkland@icloud.comPlaintiffStanley John RobertsU.C.C. 1-2071-308 w/o prejudiceClaimed Beneficiary-------------------------------------10/27/18 03:21:01 PM/406-207-5002Cause No TK 2017-1351CRIMINAL COMPLAINT****Defendant’sSTATE OF MONTANA* CITY OFHAMILTON corporation * Judge M ReardonMelanie D IsidoroKaren S. Mahar * City Attorney300 S. Second street Hamilton Mt 59840406-363-7999/223 South Second StreetHamilton Mt 59840406-363-6823Request to investigate findings AND PRESS FOR CHARGESComes now that we the people the private person Stanley Roberts request that the F.B.I. * A.T.F. *HOMELAND SECURITY * TRUMP ADMINISTRATION * US MARSHALS OFFICE * THE HEAD OF THESHERIFF DEPARTMENT * DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE *To investigate the procedures findings of the LOWER inferior courts for treason by the breaking downof the laws of the provisions- Constitutional provision- supremo law of the land.They {The listed defendants} violated the oath{Article 6 paragraph 2}by the committed acts oftreason by sedition during court procedures and by government trickery schemes - We charge{Count 1-Title 18 US241-242-1628-2183- and title 42 US}for there actions of diminishing taken breaking down the laws they are to knowand protect{see attached records of excluded paperwork}2/5 {Treason by sedition complaint}{The plaintiff claimed beneficiary Stanley John Roberts I attached the objections and during court and filedthey ignored the objections and the three times of asking for jurisdiction to be answered and the burdenof proof shifted to the prosecuting attorneys.They the listed defendants violated in paperwork ignored and seems to think that theConstitutional issues are irrelevant. They the defendants along together proceeded to move forward andbe impartial and illegally held a trial and went forward ignoring and diminishing rights and thesupremo law of the land.Now comes for future record that the plaintiff request for investigations nd to hold thoseaccountable for violating the oath of office and now - {Request counter claim for 50,000 dollars perviolations that can now be proven by actions in a court of law} No judge or attorneys can ignore thelaw or be above the law.{The listed defendants} are to be fair and impartial to protect the law and know the differencebetween actual law v illegal unconstitutional act. Who says so- the people say so-the law says so.{Marbury v Madison 5 US.137}{Where rights secured by the constitution are involved there can be norule or law making legislation which would abrogate abolish them Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436}They- who ? The listed defendants excluded paperwork off the record and did notkeep records, and the judge and attorneys did work in collusion and stealing the claimed beneficiaryplaintiff Stanley John Roberts and his fellow Americans rights that they are to protect.Any courts and government institutions corporations city towns and counties states orfederal is under agreement to govern by Constitution promised to govern by as institutions in harmonyin agreement between the people and compact states. The listed defendants from the beginning ignoredall paper work filed by Stanley John Roberts. The submitted of the discovery and findings in hisdismissal- grounds- complaint-and before all of this – the plaintiff was arrested put in jail andtricked into a hidden unknown contract- that violated his choice to consent or not.Stanley John Roberts was coerced tricked in to waiving his rights for a illegal blood test from policemilitary tactics of scaring plaintiff that was in fear or under duress.Furthermore no Miranda reading and was ignored and was stated in court by the judge thatit did not matter to be read to him. The plaintiff Stanley John Roberts now claims the alleged {Thelisted defendants} diminished his rights and now files criminal charges against the Defendant’s underthe Title 18 US 241 242 1628 2183, and title 42 US by sedition of treason FAILING TO PROTECTGUARANTEED PROVISIONS AT A STATE AND FEDERAL LEVEL.According to the law - failed to protect provisions or failed to protect rights - even thoughthe {The listed defendants} given time to correct the errors and warning of criminal intent of collusionupon the plaintiff Stanley John Roberts.3/5 {Treason by sedition complaint}THE PLAINTIFF CLAIMS{The listed defendants} together refused to take the written provisions during courtprocedures under the the due process clauses. Failed to protect the plaintiff Stanley John Roberts - thecourt moved forward sweeping under the carpet thrown it in the trash- and meeting in star chambers-without public or allowed witness-THEY THE DEFENDANTS LISTED did collude on the main issues- violating the basicbill of rights at a state level and federal level. And declaration of MT rights. THE JUDGE DURINGCOURT PROCEDURES INCRIMINATED HIS SELF BY STATING THAT HIS COURTDOES NOT RECOGNIZE THE CONSTITUTION. HE the judge said in trial that the state ofMontana does not recognize the Constitution. {Count 1Title 18 US 241,242, 1628, 2183. and othertitles under title 42 US}1/ Excluding evidence discovery of provisions. REFUSED during court. THE STATUES AND CODES ONOFFICERS COMPLAINT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND WAS DECLARED BY THE PLAINTIFF, BUT IGNORED.2/ Failed to protect provisions. BY MOVING FORWARD BY PASSING CONSTITUTIONALMATTERS. And litigation mitigation behind the scenes.3/ Failed to record court procedures- even though plaintiff has own records. NOT ALLOWING ONRECORD OR STRICKEN OFF RECORD.4/ Failed to have court in a public hearing. Had court in a private court hearing away from public.MANIPULATING COURT HEARING TO LAST OF DOCKET IN PRIVATE NO PUBLICWITNESS.5/ Failed to appoint a competent attorney that would protect his provisions then failed to. Refused toanswers plaintiff questions and paperwork filed. Then by colluded attorneys excused and filed a motionto recuse there self. Then judge made attorney stand by for trial. MORE THAN ONE ATTORNEYDID NOT WANT TO QUESTION THE CONSTITUTIONAL MATTERS. IGNORED THEACTIONS VIOLATIONS OFF POLICE OFFICER ENCOUNTER TO INCRIMINATE THEPLAINTIFF.6/ Attorneys and judge listed defendants colluded by EXCLUDING THROWN AWAY IGNORINGDISCOVERY FINDINGS OF PAPERWORK. Without a legal determination. Ignored request to shiftthe burden of proof over jurisdiction in question.7/ Ignoring the Miranda rights that is required by law, and probable cause in question. REFUSED TOANSWER IN QUESTION OF RIGHTS READ BEFORE ARREST. OR OF TAKEN OF BLOOD BYTACTICAL MILITARY METHODS.8/ Failed to comply to the request of the remedy and recourse of invoking Constitutional rights.REFUSED ALL CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDY AND CLAIMS AS THE BENEFICIARY AND OFTHE PROTECTIONS REQUIRED BY LAW.9/ Failed to protect the oath of office and the supremacy clause. REFUSED TO OBEY THE OATH ASTO PROTECT THE CLAIMED PLAINTIFFS PROVISIONS- AT ALL LEVELS. STATE ANDFEDERAL.4/5 {Treason by sedition complaint}10/ Violating there own statues codes of limitations of a speedy trial and the due process clauses.VIOLATED TIMELY MANNER FOR SPEEDY TRIAL. IGNORED *11/ Failed to let plaintiff speak to protect his self or allow objections on the matter of a fair due process.THREATEN TO PUT IN PRISON BY JUDGE REARDON FOR THIRD PARTIES OPINION ANDWITNESS. VIOLATED THE 5TH AMENDMENT AND THE 1ST AMENDMENT OF LIFELIBERTY AND THE DUE PROCESS OF A FAIR AND IMPARTIAL TRIAL.12/ COLLECTED ILLEGAL EVIDENCE BY THE EFFECT OF THE POISONOUS TREE BYPASSED EVIDENCE HEARING OVER ILLEGAL COLLECTED EVIDENCE THAT IS NOTADMISSIBLE.FAILURE TO PROTECT PROVISIONS IS A CRIMEProvisions of claimed contract clearly cannot be ignored. This would be a crime itself by notprotecting the supreme law of the land that you are to protect. Count 1-Title 18 US Code Sec. 2381: In thePRESENCE of two or more witnesses of the same overt act, or in an open court of law, if you fail to timely move toprotect and defend the Constitution of the United States and honor your oath of office, you are subject to the charge ofcapital felony treason.Count 2- Title 5 US Code Sec. 556(d), Sec. 557, Sec.706: Courts lose jurisdiction if they do not followDue Process Law. By ignoring the discovery and thresh-hold questions pertaining to the due-process denied, andappointed attorneys and judges under collusion to violate the separations of powers.Therefore, a conflict of interest for civil records- the listed judge and parties make money across thebench for every infraction and unconstitutional acts that are enforced -have equity of $18 (eighteen dollars) for every$40 (forty dollars) that comes across the bench of collusion. Conflict of interest/civil v criminal/court state trying tocreate a crime or convert provisions into a crime.By stealthy state regulations and codes and statues that are in conflict with the plaintiff’s provisionsunder the protection’s that are guaranteed by the Constitutional contract, under agreement between the Americanpeople and the government. Powers delegated to the listed violators judges and lawyers and police officers- forignoring provisions they swear to protect either by intent or error.The listed parties ARE ALLEGED that committed treason by sedition- Count 1 charge – and Count 2charge - sedition by breaking down the Constitutional laws. Those who do this have no judicial immunity. Title 18US Code Section 2381. If upon conviction they are subject to a $10,000 fine-10 years in prison or both and iftheft is results life in prison.Who says so? Owen v. Independence 100 vol. supreme court reports.1398 ; (1982) Mainv.Thiboutot100 vol. Supreme Court Reports. 2502:(1982)--deprivation under the color of law. Officers have noimmunity when violating Constitutional rights from liability. SEE ATTACHED SELF RECORDS OFPAPERWORK AND DISCOVERY OF PROVISIONS THAT THE COURTS ARE TO PROTECT BUTREFUSED TO PROTECT.THE LISTED DEFENDANTS ALONG TOGETHER Excluded ALL documents that would mitigate orlitigate the OUTCOME OF A UNFAIR ILLEGAL TRIAL WITH OUT CONSENT of the plaintiff involved with thismatter. Refusing to give equal equal protections of the law.By violating the 14th Amendment and all provisions listed in complaint and further not giving a fair dueprocess under the 7th Amendment-And of course not a speedy trial. Clearly the judge did not protect the oath that hepromised to preserve and be bound to and did not protect the provisions brought to his attention. No provisions can bedenied or diminished.5/5 {Treason by sedition complaint}Due to the facts of discovery -by actions - He denied the listed provisions and continued in favor ofviolating the plaintiff rights. DURING COURT PROCEDURES THE JUDGE SAID MONTANA DOES NOTRECOGNIZE THE CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES IN THE SUBMITTED PAPERWORK.No one has immunity when violating or breaking down the laws they swear to protect especiallywhen they have taken a oath under delegated powers granted by the people they serve. CLEARLY THE JUDGEAND LISTED DEFENDANTS VIOLATED OATH{Under Article 6 paragraph 2}The supremacy clause -TREASON BY BREAKING DOWN SUPREME LAWS.- BY SEDITIONBY constructive fraud. The undersigned being first duly sworn upon oath states the following facts showingobstructing of the plaintiff’s Constitutional rights. By the listed parties provision misconduct, criminal collusion, andbreaking down the laws claimed. Breach of Constitutional Contract that is to be safe guarded by the judge, andsecured in by the locked 9th Amendment at a state and federal level.{See attached paperwork ignored and tossed away* dismissal grounds*complaint oftaken off record*} {objection for legal determination*}Comes now that we the people the private person Stanley Roberts request that the FBI * ATF *HOMELAND SECURITY * TRUMP ADMINISTRATION * US MARSHALS OFFICE * THE HEAD OF THESHERIFF DEPARTMENT * DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE * To investigate the procedures findings of the LOWERinferior courts for treason by the breaking down of the laws of the provisions- Constitutional provision- supremo lawof the land. Thank you for your candid work for preserving and protecting life limb and property and theConstitutional provisions at a state and federal level. {INGODWETRUST MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN}{The claimed beneficiary}__________________________________________.{ADVOCATE/Findings} ______________________________________________.{CONTRACT VIOLATION AT A STATE AND FEDERAL LEVEL THAT ARE LOCKED IN BY ENUMERATED POWERS DELEGATED/ LOCKED BY THE 9TH AMENDMENT/ AND THE 10THAMENDMENT// Statement lower language/ encroachment infringement/violations of the bill of rights at a state level and federal level, MT provisions sections listed in complaint/due process clauses in theConstitutional provisions. /406 207-5002 Stanley John Roberts - i attached the objections and during court they ignored the objections and the three times of asking for jurisdiction to be answered./Theyexcluded paperwork of the record and did not keep records, and the judge and attorneys are working in collusion and stealing his rights that they are to protect. and furthermore from the beginning theyignored all paper work Stanly submitted, dismissal and grounds and complaint. and before all of this he was arrested put in jail and tricked into a hidden unknown contract- and forced to take a blood testfrom military tactics of scaring individuals. without no attorney present/criminal charges title 18 US 241 242 1628 2183, and title 42 us. sedition of treason FAILING TO PROTECT GUARANTEEDPROVISIONS AT A STATE AND FEDERAL LEVEL.{Request counter claim for 50,000 dollars per violations proven in a court of law} No judge or attorneys can ignore the law or be above the law, they are to protect the law and know the difference betweenactual law v illegal unconstitutional act. Who says so- the people say so-the law says so. {Marbury v Madison 5 U.S. 137}{Where rights secured by the constitution are involved there can be no rule or lawmaking legislation which would abrogate abolish them Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436} Section 34. Unenumerated rights. The enumeration in this constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to/deny, impair, or disparage others retained by the people. /Section 35. Servicemen, servicewomen, and veterans. The people declare that Montana servicemen, servicewomen, and veterans may be givenspecial considerations determined by the legislature.Section 31. Ex post facto, obligation of contracts, and irrevocable privileges. No ex post facto law nor any law /impairing the obligation of contracts, ormaking any irrevocable grant of special privileges, franchises, or immunities, shall be passed by the legislature/ Section 11. Searches and seizures. The people shall be secure in their persons, papers, homesand effects from /unreasonable searches and seizures. No warrant to search any place, or seize any person or thing shall issue without /describing the place to be searched or the person or thing to be seized, orwithout probable cause, supported by oath or /affirmation reduced to writing/ Section 10. Right of privacy. The right of individual privacy is essential to the well-being of a free society and shall not beinfringed without the showing of a compelling state interest. Constitution of Montana -- Article II –DECLARATION OF RIGHTS/ Section 3. Inalienable rights. All persons are born free and have certain inalienable rights. They include the right to /a clean and healthful environment and the rights ofpursuing life's basic necessities, enjoying and defending their lives /and liberties, acquiring, possessing and protecting property, and seeking their safety, health and happiness in all lawful /ways. In enjoyingthese rights, all persons recognize corresponding responsibilities./ 1 (a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do sotakes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with anyjudicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. (b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book,document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, orboth; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under 2the United States.As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States. 18 USC § 2071 2 it is settled law that delivery of a pleading to a proper official is sufficient to constitute filing thereof . United States v. Lombardo, 241 U.S. 73, 36 S. Ct. 508, 60 L. Ed. 897 (1916); Milton v. United States, 105 F.2d 253, 255 (5 th Cir. 1939). InGreeson v. Sherman, 265 F. Supp. 340 (D.C.Va.1967) it was held that a pleading delivered to a deputy clerk at his home at night was thereby "filed." (Freeman v. Giacomo Costa Fu Adrea, 282 F. Supp. 525(E.D.Pa. 04/5/1968/11 DISCOVERY/dispute but shall not act in a manner that coerces any party into settlement. *** Threaten prison time or jail time to force anyone to do what he or she wants during acourt proceeding. Telling plaintiff not to file any paperwork in his court. COMMENT [1] The right to be heard is an essential component of a fair and impartial system of justice. Substantive rights of litigantscan be protected only if procedures protecting the right to be heard are observed. [2] The judge plays an important role in overseeing the settlement of disputes, but should be careful that efforts to furthersettlement do not undermine any party’s right to be heard according to law}{Seal}

officerkirkland's picture

 

STATE OF MONTANA RAVALLI COUNTY JUSTICE COURT
205 BEDFORD SUITE F- HAMILTON MT 59840
Plaintiff
 
Claimed Beneficiary
Anthony C Anable
U.C.C. 1-207
1-308 w/o prejudice
201 Harbison
Hamilton , MT 59840
Case No- TK 2018-2261
10/20/18 11:52:51 AM

****

Defendant’s
 
Daniel Browder, Deputy
RAVALLI COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICER-
BRANDON RICHARDSON Badge #13-21
205 Bedford Street, Suite F
Hamilton, Montana 59840-285
COURT TELEPHONE 406-375-6750

{REQUEST LEGAL DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION}
key points/facts

  1. Yes the plaintiff Anthony Anabel did try to file a response and a statement verbally and by writ, and does request for a closer on the matter so that it does not waste the time of the court or any other cases in the matter of equity.
  2. Yes the plaintiff request relief to be left alone and the matter dismissed. The plaintiff does not need to rely on any lower case laws or statues or regulation codes that are in conflict with his Contract with respect of-course.
  3. Unless judge request in writing for a full report of lower case laws. He the plaintiff is utilizing higher case laws and US federal laws. However the burden of proof relies on the jurisdiction in question of authority over the none consent private person of the conflict between the contracts.
  4. The plaintiff request if the court moves forward without no consent or authority cause then he request that the burden of proof be shifted to the prosecutor -the attorney for all allegation to be proven and now request for the facts and proof of jurisdiction upon the plaintiff. Must be answered before all mitigation and litigation. By the the distinctive difference between duality of private person.
  5. The plaintiff, he request by verbal and written response. He ask the court to have the prosecution attorney to prove and answer the jurisdiction in question with no more than 10 days to answer the jurisdiction of proof by legal determination.
  6. He also request that the judge protect him from further encroachment and infringement.
  7. The listed plaintiff Anthony Anabel invoked his Constitutional rights and tried to silent any communication while the officer encroached and infringed without any true crime committed what so ever, especially without no victim or property damage, clearly the officer must have had some bias and communications with other officer to fish for inflicting some pain and suffering and to hassle a 78 year old man -that was just perusing life liberty and happiness. {Under the 1stAmendment and 5thAmendment}
  8. In the first appearance as Anthony again invoked his Constitutional Contract and claimed paperwork that was submitted and disregarded and ignored. As the judge Baily said it’s not a jail-able offense nor need of a attorney. {Taken of record} therefor matter should be closed.
  9. The plaintiff Anthony refused to be brought into a unknown contract of duality of a distinctive difference of citizenship.
  10. He claims no part or any privileges of the Admiralty and merchant or commerce court they assume to drag him into or uniform commercial codes.
  11. It is the prosecuting attorney to have the burden of proof to charge for a criminal act with intent to harm or the elements of a crime or negligence of a evil intent willfulness to commit a act.
  12. That there is none, and no true affidavit of a complaint that someone was harmed or damaged. Clearly the only one harmed is the plaintiff being pulled into a unknown court and a unconstitutional act brought upon him.

{US law facts/ Constitutional law}

  1. Am Jure 16. Sec 114 - 117: Various facts and circumstances extrinsic to the constitution are often resorted to by the courts to aid them in determining its meaning.
  2. As previously noted, however, such extrinsic aids may not be resorted to where the provision in the question is clear, and unambiguous in such a case the court must apply the terms of the constitution as written. They are not at liberty to search for meanings beyond the instrument.
  3. Am Jure 16, sec 165: Since the constitution is intended for the observance of the judiciary as well as other parts of government, and the judges are sworn to support its provisions (sworn...as in Oath of office), the courts are not at liberty to overlook or disregard its commands or countenance evasions thereof.
  4. It is their duty in authorized proceedings to give full effect to the existing constitution, and to obey all constitutional provisions irrespective to their opinion of the wisdom or the desirably of such provisions, and irrespective of the consequences.
  5. Thus is said that the courts should be in our alert to enforce the provisions of the United States Constitution, and guard against their infringement by legislative fiat or otherwise.
  6. In accordance with these basic principles the rule is fixed that the duty in the proper case to declare a law unconstitutional cannot be declined, and must be performed in accordance with the delivery of judgment of the tribunal before which the validity of the enactment is directly drawn into question. If the constitution prescribes one rule, and the statute another, in a different rule, it is the duty of the court to declare that the constitution and not the statute governs in cases before them for judgment.
  7. Therefore: if a judge attorney police officer or anyone that is delegated powers.
  8. That represents a government institution for the state of Montana and the county or town should know the law.
  9. The supreme law of the land and should be bound to and to be the guard against encroachment and infringement against ones claim of invoking Constitutional contract during a interrogation on a side of a dangerousness road.
  10. Violating at a state and federal supreme laws { 1-10 bill of rights provisions that are guaranteed} the officers and attorneys seem to think that the guaranteed provisions has no merits. {unbelievable}this is a danger to society as a whole and it in dangerous to officers and the nation as a whole in harmony.
  11. Clearly Anthony during his encounter with a so called Constitution officer that refused to acknowledge his invoking of his Constitutional contract and trying to get the officer to comply but ignored and threating witness and causing duress. Then only denied and ignored then to give a bill of pain and bill of a attainder that is in conflict with his contract. {Article 1, section 9 10- US Constitution}
  12.  

{With respect to all who reads this}
I will attach some supreme cases for you to do your home work. Even though you have been programed to believe that its OK to rob people under the color of law by error or intent-
and ignore the redress of a veteran that is 78 years old that just wants to live the rest of his life alone without some Gestapo third world country police officer violating and ignoring the provisions of the supreme law -
he owes nothing more to the states in harmony unless he actually harms someone that filed a affidavit of a actual crime according to the due process clauses.
Thank you for your candid work -and we love you-
{See attached case laws US}and to mention at a state level provisions declaration of rights section 10,11,and many more locked in by his paperwork that was ignored. According to state provisions privacy is essential to a strong union.
ingodwetrust/

Claimed beneficiary/ ____________________________________
Advocate/witness/_____________________________________
{Comes now that we the people the private person request that the F.B.I. * A.T.F.* HOMELAND SECURITY * TRUMP ADMINISTRATION * US MARSHALS OFFICE * THE HEAD OF THE SHERIFF DEPARTMENT * DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE * To investigate the procedures findings of the LOWER inferior courts for treason by the breaking down of the laws of the provisions- Constitutional provision- supremo law of the land.}Exhibit-1 breech of Constitutional contract-motion to dismiss grounds collected facts- in the interest of justice--Exhibit-2 – objection to motion to strike- grounds- Exhibit-3- request for legal determination of jurisdiction in question. Exhibit -4- copy of discovery federal case laws.{CONTRACT VIOLATION AT A STATE AND FEDERAL LEVEL THAT ARE LOCKED IN BY ENUMERATED POWERS DELEGATED/ LOCKED BY THE 9TH AMENDMENT/ AND THE 10TH
AMENDMENT// Statement lower language/ encroachment infringement/violations of the bill of rights at a state level and federal level, MT provisions sections listed in complaint/due process clauses in the
Constitutional provisions. /406 207-5002 Stanley John Roberts - i attached the objections and during court they ignored the objections and the three times of asking for jurisdiction to be answered./They
excluded paperwork of the record and did not keep records, and the judge and attorneys are working in collusion and stealing his rights that they are to protect. and furthermore from the beginning they
ignored all paper work Stanly submitted, dismissal and grounds and complaint. and before all of this he was arrested put in jail and tricked into a hidden unknown contract- and forced to take a blood test
from military tactics of scaring individuals. without no attorney present/criminal charges title 18 US 241 242 1628 2183, and title 42 us. sedition of treason FAILING TO PROTECT GUARANTEED
PROVISIONS AT A STATE AND FEDERAL LEVEL.
{Request counter claim for 50,000 dollars per violations proven in a court of law} No judge or attorneys can ignore the law or be above the law, they are to protect the law and know the difference between
actual law v illegal unconstitutional act. Who says so- the people say so-the law says so. {Marbury v Madison 5 U.S. 137}{Where rights secured by the constitution are involved there can be no rule or law
making legislation which would abrogate abolish them Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436} Section 34. Unenumerated rights. The enumeration in this constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to
/deny, impair, or disparage others retained by the people. /Section 35. Servicemen, servicewomen, and veterans. The people declare that Montana servicemen, servicewomen, and veterans may be given
special considerations determined by the legislature.Section 31. Ex post facto, obligation of contracts, and irrevocable privileges. No ex post facto law nor any law /impairing the obligation of contracts, or5/5 {NOTICE OF APPEAL}
making any irrevocable grant of special privileges, franchises, or immunities, shall be passed by the legislature/ Section 11. Searches and seizures. The people shall be secure in their persons, papers, homes
and effects from /unreasonable searches and seizures. No warrant to search any place, or seize any person or thing shall issue without /describing the place to be searched or the person or thing to be seized, or
without probable cause, supported by oath or /affirmation reduced to writing/ Section 10. Right of privacy. The right of individual privacy is essential to the well-being of a free society and shall not be
infringed without the showing of a compelling state interest. Constitution of Montana -- Article II –
DECLARATION OF RIGHTS/ Section 3. Inalienable rights. All persons are born free and have certain inalienable rights. They include the right to /a clean and healthful environment and the rights of
pursuing life's basic necessities, enjoying and defending their lives /and liberties, acquiring, possessing and protecting property, and seeking their safety, health and happiness in all lawful /ways. In enjoying
these rights, all persons recognize corresponding responsibilities./ 1 (a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so
takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any
judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. (b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book,
document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or
both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under 2the United States.
As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States. 18 USC § 2071 2 it is settled law that delivery of a p
leading to a proper official is sufficient to constitute filing thereof . United States v. Lombardo, 241 U.S. 73, 36 S. Ct. 508, 60 L. Ed. 897 (1916); Milton v. United States, 105 F.2d 253, 255 (5 th Cir. 1939). In
Greeson v. Sherman, 265 F. Supp. 340 (D.C.Va.1967) it was held that a pleading delivered to a deputy clerk at his home at night was thereby "filed." (Freeman v. Giacomo Costa Fu Adrea, 282 F. Supp. 525
(E.D.Pa. 04/5/1968/11 DISCOVERY/dispute but shall not act in a manner that coerces any party into settlement. *** Threaten prison time or jail time to force anyone to do what he or she wants during a
court proceeding. Telling plaintiff not to file any paperwork in his court. COMMENT [1] The right to be heard is an essential component of a fair and impartial system of justice. Substantive rights of litigants
can be protected only if procedures protecting the right to be heard are observed. [2] The judge plays an important role in overseeing the settlement of disputes, but should be careful that efforts to further
settlement do not undermine any party’s right to be heard according to law}
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31zRfrGU0P4
 
http://www.montanaconstitution.com/index.php?title=ARTICLE_II._DECLARATION_OF_RIGHTS
 
What is COLLUSION?
A deceitful agreement or compact between two or more persons, for the one party to bring an action against the other for some evil purpose, as to defraud a third party of his right Cowell. A secret
arrangement between two or more persons, whose interests are apparently conflicting, to make use of the forms and proceedings of law in order to defraud a third person, or to obtain that which justice would
not give them, by deceiving a court or it officers. Baldwin v. New York, 45 Barb. (N. Y.) 359; Belt v. Blackburn, 28 Md. 235; Railroad Co. v. Gay. 8G Tex. 571, 26 S. W. 599, 25 L. R. A. 52; Balch v.
Beach, 119 Wis. 77, 95 N. W. 132. In divorce proceedings, collusion is an agreement between husband and wife that one of them shall commit, or appear to have committed, or be represented in court as
having committed, acts constituting a cause of divorce, for the purpose of enabling the other to obtain a divorce. Civil Code Cal
 
Related Legal Terms
ACTIONABLE FRAUD, FRAUD ARE, FRAUD, MATERIAL FRAUD, INTRINSIC FRAUD, FRAUD IN THE INDUCEMENT, CONTRACTOR FRAUD, CONSUMER FRAUD, AFFINITY
FRAUD, BADGE OF FRAUD
What is CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD?
1.an unintended deception. 2. getting legal advantage through unfair means. The poor, ignorant, and weak are targeted. The court may set aside an agreement due to the unreasonable terms of
the contract.
 
What is BREACH OF THE PEACE?
A violation of the public tranquillity and order. The offense of breaking or disturbing the public peace by any riotous, forcible, or unlawful proceeding. 4 Bl. Comm. 142. ct scq.; People v. Bartz, 53 Mich.
493, 19 X. W. 161; State v. White, 18 R. I. 473, 28 Atl. 968; People v. Wallace. 85 App. Div. 170, 83 N. Y. Supp. 130; Scougale v. Sweet, 124 Mich. 311, 82 N. W. 1061. A constructive breach of the peace
is an unlawful act which, though wanting the elements of actual violence or injury to any person, is yet inconsistent with tiie peaceable and orderly conduct of society. Various kinds of misdemeanors are
included in this general designation, such as sending challenges to fight, going armed in public without lawful reason and in a threatening manner, etc. An apprehended breach of the peace is caused by the
conduct of a man who threatens another with violence or physical injury, or who goes about in public with dangerous and unusual weapons in a threatening or alarming manner, or who publishes an
aggravated libel upon another, etc.
 
What is MISCONDUCT?
Any unlawful conduct on the part of a person concerned in the ad- ministration of justice which is prejudicial to the rights of parties or to the right deter- mination of the cause; as “misconduct of
jurors,” “misconduct of an arbitrator.” The term is also used to express a dereliction from duty, injurious to another, on the part of one employed in a professional capacity, as an attorney at law,
(Stage v. Stevens, 1 Denio [N. Y.] 267,) or a public officer, (State v. Leach, 60 Me. 58, 11 Am. Rep. 172.)

{SEAL}

officerkirkland's picture

1/4 {REQUEST LEGAL DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION}STATE OF MONTANA RAVALLI COUNTY JUSTICE COURT205 BEDFORD SUITE F- HAMILTON MT 59840PlaintiffClaimed BeneficiaryAnthony C AnableU.C.C. 1-2071-308 w/o prejudice201 HarbisonHamilton , MT 59840Case No- TK 2018-226110/20/18 11:52:51 AM****Defendant’sDaniel Browder, DeputyRAVALLI COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICER-BRANDON RICHARDSON Badge #13-21205 Bedford Street, Suite FHamilton, Montana 59840-285COURT TELEPHONE 406-375-6750{REQUEST LEGAL DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION}key points/facts1. Yes the plaintiff Anthony Anabel did try to file a response and a statement verbally and by writ, and doesrequest for a closer on the matter so that it does not waste the time of the court or any other cases in thematter of equity.2. Yes the plaintiff request relief to be left alone and the matter dismissed. The plaintiff does not need torely on any lower case laws or statues or regulation codes that are in conflict with his Contract withrespect of-course.3. Unless judge request in writing for a full report of lower case laws. He the plaintiff is utilizing highercase laws and US federal laws. However the burden of proof relies on the jurisdiction in question ofauthority over the none consent private person of the conflict between the contracts.4. The plaintiff request if the court moves forward without no consent or authority cause then he requestthat the burden of proof be shifted to the prosecutor -the attorney for all allegation to be proven and nowrequest for the facts and proof of jurisdiction upon the plaintiff. Must be answered before all mitigationand litigation. By the the distinctive difference between duality of private person.2/4 {REQUEST LEGAL DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION}5. The plaintiff, he request by verbal and written response. He ask the court to have the prosecution attorneyto prove and answer the jurisdiction in question with no more than 10 days to answer the jurisdiction ofproof by legal determination.6. He also request that the judge protect him from further encroachment and infringement.7. The listed plaintiff Anthony Anabel invoked his Constitutional rights and tried to silent anycommunication while the officer encroached and infringed without any true crime committed what soever, especially without no victim or property damage, clearly the officer must have had some bias andcommunications with other officer to fish for inflicting some pain and suffering and to hassle a 78 yearold man -that was just perusing life liberty and happiness. {Under the 1 st Amendment and 5 th Amendment}8.In the first appearance as Anthony again invoked his Constitutional Contract and claimed paperwork thatwas submitted and disregarded and ignored. As the judge Baily said it’s not a jail-able offense nor needof a attorney. {Taken of record} therefor matter should be closed.9. The plaintiff Anthony refused to be brought into a unknown contract of duality of a distinctivedifference of citizenship.10. He claims no part or any privileges of the Admiralty and merchant or commerce court they assume todrag him into or uniform commercial codes.11. It is the prosecuting attorney to have the burden of proof to charge for a criminal act with intent to harmor the elements of a crime or negligence of a evil intent willfulness to commit a act.12. That there is none, and no true affidavit of a complaint that someone was harmed or damaged. Clearly theonly one harmed is the plaintiff being pulled into a unknown court and a unconstitutional act broughtupon him.{US law facts/ Constitutional law}13. Am Jure 16. Sec 114 - 117: Various facts and circumstances extrinsic to the constitution are oftenresorted to by the courts to aid them in determining its meaning.14. As previously noted, however, such extrinsic aids may not be resorted to where the provision in thequestion is clear, and unambiguous in such a case the court must apply the terms of the constitution aswritten. They are not at liberty to search for meanings beyond the instrument.15. Am Jure 16, sec 165: Since the constitution is intended for the observance of the judiciary as well asother parts of government, and the judges are sworn to support its provisions (sworn...as in Oath ofoffice), the courts are not at liberty to overlook or disregard its commands or countenance evasionsthereof.16. It is their duty in authorized proceedings to give full effect to the existing constitution, and to obey allconstitutional provisions irrespective to their opinion of the wisdom or the desirably of such provisions,and irrespective of the consequences.17. Thus is said that the courts should be in our alert to enforce the provisions of the United StatesConstitution, and guard against their infringement by legislative fiat or otherwise.18. In accordance with these basic principles the rule is fixedthat the duty in the proper case to declare a law unconstitutional cannot be declined, and must beperformed in accordance with the delivery of judgment of the tribunal before which the validity of theenactment is directly drawn into question. If the constitution prescribes one rule, and the statuteanother, in a different rule, it is the duty of the court to declare that the constitution and not the statutegoverns in cases before them for judgment.3/4 {REQUEST LEGAL DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION}19. Therefore: if a judge attorney police officer or anyone that is delegated powers.20. That represents a government institution for the state of Montana and the county or town should knowthe law.21. The supreme law of the land and should be bound to and to be the guard against encroachment andinfringement against ones claim of invoking Constitutional contract during a interrogation on a side of adangerousness road.22. Violating at a state and federal supreme laws { 1-10 bill of rights provisions that are guaranteed} theofficers and attorneys seem to think that the guaranteed provisions has no merits. {unbelievable}this is adanger to society as a whole and it in dangerous to officers and the nation as a whole in harmony.23. Clearly Anthony during his encounter with a so called Constitution officer that refused to acknowledgehis invoking of his Constitutional contract and trying to get the officer to comply but ignored andthreating witness and causing duress. Then only denied and ignored then to give a bill of pain and bill ofa attainder that is in conflict with his contract. {Article 1, section 9 10- US Constitution}24.{With respect to all who reads this}I will attach some supreme cases for you to do your home work. Even though you havebeen programed to believe that its OK to rob people under the color of law by error or intent-and ignore the redress of a veteran that is 78 years old that just wants to live the rest of hislife alone without some Gestapo third world country police officer violating and ignoring theprovisions of the supreme law -he owes nothing more to the states in harmony unless he actually harms someone that fileda affidavit of a actual crime according to the due process clauses.Thank you for your candid work -and we love you-{See attached case laws US}and to mention at a state level provisions declaration of rights section10,11,and many more locked in by his paperwork that was ignored. According to state provisionsprivacy is essential to a strong union.ingodwetrust/Claimed beneficiary/ ____________________________________Advocate/witness/_____________________________________{Comes now that we the people the private person request that the F.B.I. * A.T.F. * HOMELAND SECURITY * TRUMP ADMINISTRATION * US MARSHALS OFFICE * THE HEAD OF THESHERIFF DEPARTMENT * DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE * To investigate the procedures findings of the LOWER inferior courts for treason by the breaking down of the laws of the provisions-Constitutional provision- supremo law of the land.}Exhibit-1 breech of Constitutional contract-motion to dismiss grounds collected facts- in the interest of justice--Exhibit-2 – objection to motion to strike-grounds- Exhibit-3- request for legal determination of jurisdiction in question. Exhibit -4- copy of discovery federal case laws.{CONTRACT VIOLATION AT A STATE AND FEDERAL LEVEL THATARE LOCKED IN BY ENUMERATED POWERS DELEGATED/ LOCKED BY THE 9TH AMENDMENT/ AND THE 10THAMENDMENT// Statement lower language/ encroachment infringement/violations of the bill of rights at a state level and federal level, MT provisions sections listed in complaint/due process clauses in theConstitutional provisions. /406 207-5002 Stanley John Roberts - i attached the objections and during court they ignored the objections and the three times of asking for jurisdiction to be answered./Theyexcluded paperwork of the record and did not keep records, and the judge and attorneys are working in collusion and stealing his rights that they are to protect. and furthermore from the beginning theyignored all paper work Stanly submitted, dismissal and grounds and complaint. and before all of this he was arrested put in jail and tricked into a hidden unknown contract- and forced to take a blood testfrom military tactics of scaring individuals. without no attorney present/criminal charges title 18 US 241 242 1628 2183, and title 42 us. sedition of treason FAILING TO PROTECT GUARANTEEDPROVISIONS AT A STATE AND FEDERAL LEVEL.{Request counter claim for 50,000 dollars per violations proven in a court of law} No judge or attorneys can ignore the law or be above the law, they are to protect the law and know the difference betweenactual law v illegal unconstitutional act. Who says so- the people say so-the law says so. {Marbury v Madison 5 U.S. 137}{Where rights secured by the constitution are involved there can be no rule or lawmaking legislation which would abrogate abolish them Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436} Section 34. Unenumerated rights. The enumeration in this constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to/deny, impair, or disparage others retained by the people. /Section 35. Servicemen, servicewomen, and veterans. The people declare that Montana servicemen, servicewomen, and veterans may be given4/4 {REQUEST LEGAL DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION}special considerations determined by the legislature.Section 31. Ex post facto, obligation of contracts, and irrevocable privileges. No ex post facto law nor any law /impairing the obligation of contracts, or5/5{NOTICE OF APPEAL}making any irrevocable grant of special privileges, franchises, or immunities, shall be passed by the legislature/ Section 11. Searches and seizures. The people shall be secure in their persons, papers, homesand effects from /unreasonable searches and seizures. No warrant to search any place, or seize any person or thing shall issue without /describing the place to be searched or the person or thing to be seized, orwithout probable cause, supported by oath or /affirmation reduced to writing/ Section 10. Right of privacy. The right of individual privacy is essential to the well-being of a free society and shall not beinfringed without the showing of a compelling state interest. Constitution of Montana -- Article II –DECLARATION OF RIGHTS/ Section 3. Inalienable rights. All persons are born free and have certain inalienable rights. They include the right to /a clean and healthful environment and the rights ofpursuing life's basic necessities, enjoying and defending their lives /and liberties, acquiring, possessing and protecting property, and seeking their safety, health and happiness in all lawful /ways. In enjoyingthese rights, all persons recognize corresponding responsibilities./ 1 (a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do sotakes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with anyjudicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. (b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book,document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, orboth; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under 2the United States.As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States. 18 USC § 2071 2 it is settled law that delivery of a pleading to a proper official is sufficient to constitute filing thereof . United States v. Lombardo, 241 U.S. 73, 36 S. Ct. 508, 60 L. Ed. 897 (1916); Milton v. United States, 105 F.2d 253, 255 (5 th Cir. 1939).InGreeson v. Sherman, 265 F. Supp. 340 (D.C.Va.1967) it was held that a pleading delivered to a deputy clerk at his home at night was thereby "filed." (Freeman v. Giacomo Costa Fu Adrea, 282 F. Supp. 525(E.D.Pa. 04/5/1968/11 DISCOVERY/dispute but shall not act in a manner that coerces any party into settlement. *** Threaten prison time or jail time to force anyone to do what he or she wants during acourt proceeding. Telling plaintiff not to file any paperwork in his court. COMMENT [1] The right to be heard is an essential component of a fair and impartial system of justice. Substantive rights of litigantscan be protected only if procedures protecting the right to be heard are observed. [2] The judge plays an important role in overseeing the settlement of disputes, but should be careful that efforts to furthersettlement do not undermine any party’s right to be heard according to law}https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31zRfrGU0P4http://www.montanaconstitutio... is COLLUSION?A deceitful agreement or compact between two or more persons, for the one party to bring an action against the other for some evil purpose, as to defraud a third party of his right Cowell. A secretarrangement between two or more persons, whose interests are apparently conflicting, to make use of the forms and proceedings of law in order to defraud a third person, or to obtain that which justice wouldnot give them, by deceiving a court or it officers. Baldwin v. New York, 45 Barb. (N. Y.) 359; Belt v. Blackburn, 28 Md. 235; Railroad Co. v. Gay. 8G Tex. 571, 26 S. W. 599, 25 L. R. A. 52; Balch v.Beach, 119 Wis. 77, 95 N. W. 132. In divorce proceedings, collusion is an agreement between husband and wife that one of them shall commit, or appear to have committed, or be represented in court ashaving committed, acts constituting a cause of divorce, for the purpose of enabling the other to obtain a divorce. Civil Code CalRelated Legal TermsACTIONABLE FRAUD, FRAUD ARE, FRAUD, MATERIAL FRAUD, INTRINSIC FRAUD, FRAUD IN THE INDUCEMENT, CONTRACTOR FRAUD, CONSUMER FRAUD, AFFINITYFRAUD, BADGE OF FRAUDWhat is CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD?1.an unintended deception. 2. getting legal advantage through unfair means. The poor, ignorant, and weak are targeted. The court may set aside an agreement due to the unreasonable terms ofthe contract.What is BREACH OF THE PEACE?A violation of the public tranquillity and order. The offense of breaking or disturbing the public peace by any riotous, forcible, or unlawful proceeding. 4 Bl. Comm. 142. ct scq.; People v. Bartz, 53 Mich.493, 19 X. W. 161; State v. White, 18 R. I. 473, 28 Atl. 968; People v. Wallace. 85 App. Div. 170, 83 N. Y. Supp. 130; Scougale v. Sweet, 124 Mich. 311, 82 N. W. 1061. A constructive breach of the peaceis an unlawful act which, though wanting the elements of actual violence or injury to any person, is yet inconsistent with tiie peaceable and orderly conduct of society. Various kinds of misdemeanors areincluded in this general designation, such as sending challenges to fight, going armed in public without lawful reason and in a threatening manner, etc. An apprehended breach of the peace is caused by theconduct of a man who threatens another with violence or physical injury, or who goes about in public with dangerous and unusual weapons in a threatening or alarming manner, or who publishes anaggravated libel upon another, etc.What is MISCONDUCT?Any unlawful conduct on the part of a person concerned in the ad- ministration of justice which is prejudicial to the rights of parties or to the right deter- mination of the cause; as “misconduct ofjurors,” “misconduct of an arbitrator.” The term is also used to express a dereliction from duty, injurious to another, on the part of one employed in a professional capacity, as an attorney at law,(Stage v. Stevens, 1 Denio [N. Y.] 267,) or a public officer, (State v. Leach, 60 Me. 58, 11 Am. Rep. 172.){SEAL}

officerkirkland's picture

 

TO THE OFFICE OF THE HEAD * TRUMP ADMINISTRATION
\INSTITUTIONS IN HARMONY/
{special unit- for treason of inferior courts}
{Title 18 US Code Section 2381 241 242 1628 2183}
 
 
Plaintiff
________________________-
U.C.C. 1-207
1-308 w/o prejudice
Claimed Beneficiary
-------------------------------------
___________________________
Cause DC 99-14
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

****
 
 
Defendant’s
 
STATE OF MONTANA* 21 District corporation
Judge ,______________________
Attorney, ________________________
________________________
 
 
Request to investigate findings AND PRESS FOR CHARGES
 
Comes now that we the people the private person ___________________request that the F.B.I. * A.T.F. * HOMELAND SECURITY * TRUMP ADMINISTRATION * US MARSHALS OFFICE * THE HEAD OF THE SHERIFF DEPARTMENT * DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE *
 
To investigate the procedures findings of the LOWER inferior courts for treason by the breaking down of the laws of the provisions- Constitutional provision- supremo law of the land - for excessive pain and suffering of the plaintiff crue punishment, violating the 8th amendment at a state and federal level. se attached paperwork and statement from the plaintiff _______________. {see the statement from plaintiff pain and suffering in jail.}
 
They{The listed defendants}violated the oath{Article 6 paragraph 2}by the committed acts of treason by sedition during court procedures and by government trickery schemes - We charge{Count 1-Title 18 US 241-242-1628-2183- and title 42 US}for there actions of diminishing taken breaking down the laws they are to know and protect{see attached records of excluded paperwork}- for not lowering the sentence of a alleged findings that was in error for excessive cruel punishment. the punishment overly cruel and excessive, we request and to petition for a second chance to pursue life and liberty to pursue the basic necessities of life.
 
 
Now comes for future record that the plaintiff-_________________ request for investigations and to hold those accountable for violating the oath of office and now - {Request counter claim for 50,000 dollars per violations that can now be proven by actions in a court of law} No judge or attorneys can ignore the law or be above the law.
 
{The listed defendants} are to be fair and impartial to protect the law and know the difference between actual law v illegal unconstitutional act. Who says so- the people say so-the law says so. {Marbury v Madison 5 US.137}{Where rights secured by the constitution are involved there can be no rule or law making legislation which would abrogate abolish them Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436}
 
They- who ? The listed defendants excluded paperwork off the record and did not keep records, and the judge and attorneys did work in collusion and stealing the claimed beneficiary plaintiff ___________________-and his fellow Americans rights that they are to protect.
 
Any courts and government institutions corporations city towns and counties states or federal is under agreement to govern by Constitution promised to govern by as institutions in harmony in agreement between the people and compact states. The listed defendants from the beginning ignored all paper work filed by plaintiff __________________- The submitted of the discovery and findings in his complaint-
see attached pain and suffering for the exesive punishment.
 
{The listed defendants} diminished his rights and now files criminal charges against the Defendant’s under the Title 18 US 241 242 1628 2183, and title 42 US by sedition of treason FAILING TO PROTECT GUARANTEED PROVISIONS AT A STATE AND FEDERAL LEVEL.
 
According to the law - failed to protect provisions or failed to protect rights - even though the {The listed defendants} given time to correct the errors and warning of criminal intent of collusion upon the plaintiff __________________________.

THE PLAINTIFF CLAIMS
{The listed defendants} together refused to take the written provisions during court procedures under the the due process clauses. Failed to protect the plaintiff _______________________- the court moved forward sweeping under the carpet thrown it in the trash- and meeting in star chambers- without public or allowed witness-
THEY THE DEFENDANTS LISTED did collude on the main issues- violating the basic bill of rights at a state level and federal level. And declaration of MT rights. by the courts action over lapping excessive fines and excessivesentencing -THE JUDGE DURING COURT PROCEDURES DOES NOT RECOGNIZE THE CONSTITUTION 8th amendment that he should of protected the plaintiff.
by violating the Constitutional provision at all levels 8th amendment and the declaration of rights section ____________________-__.this would by judges actions say that the state of Montana does not recognize the Constitution. {Count 1Title 18 US 241,242, 1628, 2183. and other titles under title 42 US} the provisions is law supreme law.
/ Excluding evidence discovery of provisions. REFUSED during court. THE STATUES AND CODES ON OFFICERS COMPLAINT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND WAS DECLARED BY THE PLAINTIFF, BUT IGNORED.
/ Failed to protect provisions. BY MOVING FORWARD BY PASSING CONSTITUTIONAL MATTERS. And litigation mitigation behind the scenes.
/ Failed to comply to the request of the remedy and recourse of invoking Constitutional rights. REFUSED ALL CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDY AND CLAIMS AS THE BENEFICIARY AND OF THE PROTECTIONS REQUIRED BY LAW.
/ Failed to protect the oath of office and the supremacy clause. REFUSED TO OBEY THE OATH AS TO PROTECT THE CLAIMED PLAINTIFFS PROVISIONS- AT ALL LEVELS. STATE AND FEDERAL.
VIOLATED THE 5TH AMENDMENT AND THE 1ST AMENDMENT OF LIFE LIBERTY AND THE DUE PROCESS OF A FAIR AND IMPARTIAL TRIAL.
/ COLLECTED ILLEGAL EVIDENCE BY THE EFFECT OF THE POISONOUS TREE BY PASSED EVIDENCE HEARING OVER ILLEGAL COLLECTED EVIDENCE THAT IS NOT ADMISSIBLE.

FAILURE TO PROTECT PROVISIONS IS A CRIME
Provisions of claimed contract clearly cannot be ignored. This would be a crime itself by not protecting the supreme law of the land that you are to protect. Count 1-Title 18 US Code Sec. 2381: In the PRESENCE of two or more witnesses of the same overt act, or in an open court of law, if you fail to timely move to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States and honor your oath of office, you are subject to the charge of capital felony treason.
Count 2- Title 5 US Code Sec. 556(d), Sec. 557, Sec.706: Courts lose jurisdiction if they do not follow Due Process Law. By ignoring the discovery and thresh-hold questions pertaining to the due-process denied, and appointed attorneys and judges under collusion to violate the separations of powers.
By stealthy state regulations and codes and statues that are in conflict with the plaintiff’s provisions under the protection’s that are guaranteed by the Constitutional contract, under agreement between the American people and the government. Powers delegated to the listed violators judges and lawyers and police officers- for ignoring provisions they swear to protect either by intent or error.
The listed parties ARE ALLEGED that committed treason by sedition- Count 1 charge – and Count 2 charge - sedition by breaking down the Constitutional laws. Those who do this have no judicial immunity. Title 18 US Code Section 2381. If upon conviction they are subject to a $10,000 fine-10 years in prison or both and if theft is results life in prison.
Who says so? Owen v. Independence 100 vol. supreme court reports.1398 ; (1982) Main v.Thiboutot100 vol. Supreme Court Reports. 2502:(1982)--deprivation under the color of law. Officers have no immunity when violating Constitutional rights from liability. SEE ATTACHED SELF RECORDS OF PAPERWORK AND DISCOVERY OF PROVISIONS THAT THE COURTS ARE TO PROTECT BUT REFUSED TO PROTECT.
{see statement by plaintiff of allegations}
Due to the facts of discovery -by actions - was denied in questions of the excessive cruel unusual punishment } denied the listed provisions and continued in favor of violating the plaintiff rights. 8th amendment he claims,
No one has immunity when violating or breaking down the laws they swear to protect especially when they have taken a oath under delegated powers granted by the people they serve.
The undersigned being first duly sworn upon oath states the following facts showing obstructing of the plaintiff’s Constitutional rights. By the listed parties provision misconduct, criminal collusion, and breaking down the laws claimed. Breach of Constitutional Contract that is to be safe guarded by the judge, and secured in by the locked 9th Amendment at a state and federal level.

Comes now that we the people the private person plaintiff ________________-request that the FBI * ATF * HOMELAND SECURITY * TRUMP ADMINISTRATION * US MARSHALS OFFICE * THE HEAD OF THE SHERIFF DEPARTMENT * DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE * To investigate the procedures findings of the courts for treason by the breaking down of the laws of the provisions- the plaintiff is guaranteed_________________- Constitutional provision- supremo law of the land.
 
Thank you for your candid work for preserving and protecting life limb and property and the Constitutional provisions at a state and federal level. {INGODWETRUST MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN}
 
{The claimed beneficiary}__________________________________________.
{Seal}

officerkirkland's picture

 

MONTANA TWENTY-FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT-RAVALLI COUNTY BEFORE THE HONORABLE ________________________
Plaintiff
 
Stanley John Roberts
U.C.C. 1-207
1-308 w/o prejudice
Claimed Beneficiary
428 Moose Hollow Rd
Victor MT 59875
11/22/18 05:48:27 PM/406-207-5002
CAUSE NO TK 2017-1351
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

****
Defendant’s
 
1/ CITY OF HAMILTON corporation
2/Judge M Reardon
3/ HEAD ATTORNEY JOHN BELL FOR CITY
4/ Karen S. Mahar * City Attorney
5/ Melanie D Isidoro 2ND APPOINTED PUBLIC ATTORNEY
6/ POLICE OFFICER WILLIAMS BADGE # 12
300 S. Second street Hamilton Mt 59840
406-363-7999/223 South Second Street
Hamilton Mt 59840
406-363-6823
FINDINGS
 
{Request to investigate findings and press for charges}
 
Comes now that we the people the private person Stanley Roberts request that the 21 DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL AND * F.B.I. * A.T.F.* HOMELAND SECURITY * TRUMP ADMINISTRATION * US MARSHALS OFFICE * THE HEAD OF THE SHERIFF DEPARTMENT * DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE *
 
To investigate the act of procedures and the findings of the LOWER inferior courts for treason by the breaking down of the laws of the provisions- Constitutional provision- supreme law of the land. They{The listed defendants}violated the oath{Article 6 paragraph 2}by the committed acts of treason by sedition during court procedures and by government trickery schemes - We charge against the listed defendants for the record{Count 1-Title 18 US 241-242-1628-2183- and title 42 US}for there actions
 
of diminishing taken breaking down the laws they are to know and protect{see attached records of excluded paperwork} for a illegal trial and without consent and with a conflict between the contract that the lower court are to operate under- by to give a fair trial and answer the violations that was questioned during trial and before.
 
 
 
 
{The plaintiff claimed beneficiaryStanley John Roberts I attached the objections and during court and filed they ignored the objections and the three times of asking for jurisdiction to be answered and the burden of proof shifted to the prosecuting attorneys.
 
They the listed defendants violated in paperwork ignored and seems to think that the Constitutional issues are irrelevant. They the defendants along together proceeded to move forward and be impartial and illegally held a trial and went forward ignoring and diminishing rights and the supremo law of the land.
 
Now comes for future record that the plaintiff request for investigations nd to hold those accountable for violating the oath of office and now -{Request counter claim for 50,000 dollars per violations that can now be proven by actions in a court of law} No judge or attorneys can ignore the law or be above the law.
 
{The listed defendants} are to be fair and impartial to protect the law and know the difference between actual law v illegal unconstitutional act. Who says so- the people say so-the law says so. {Marbury v Madison 5 US.137}{Where rights secured by the constitution are involved there can be no rule or law making legislation which would abrogate abolish them Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436}
 
They- who ? The listed defendants excluded paperwork off the record and did not keep records, and the judge and attorneys did work in collusion and stealing the claimed beneficiary plaintiff Stanley John Roberts and his fellow Americans rights that they are to protect.
 
Any courts and government institutions corporations city towns and counties states or federal is under agreement to govern by Constitution promised to govern by as institutions in harmony in agreement between the people and compact states.
 
The listed defendantsfrom the beginning ignored all paper work filed by Stanley John Roberts. The submitted of the discovery and findings in his dismissal- grounds- complaint-and before all of this – the plaintiff was arrested put in jail and tricked into a hidden unknown contract- that violated his choice to consent or not.
 
Stanley John Robertswas coerced tricked in to waiving his rights for a illegal blood test from police military tactics of scaring plaintiff that was in fear or under duress.
 
Furthermore no Miranda reading and was ignored and was stated in court by the judge that it did not matter to be read to him.
 
The plaintiff Stanley John Roberts now claims the alleged {The listed defendants} diminished his rights and now files criminal charges against the Defendant’s under the Title 18 US 241 242 1628 2183, and title 42 US by sedition of treason FAILING TO PROTECT GUARANTEED PROVISIONS AT A STATE AND FEDERAL LEVEL.
 
According to the law - failed to protect provisions or failed to protect rights - even though the {The listed defendants} given time to correct the errors and warning of criminal intent of collusion upon the plaintiff Stanley John Roberts.
FACTS
{The listed defendants} together refused to take the written provisions during court procedures under the the due process clauses. Failed to protect the plaintiff Stanley John Roberts - the court moved forward sweeping under the carpet thrown it in the trash- and meeting in star chambers- without public or allowed witness-
THEY THE DEFENDANTS LISTED did collude on the main issues- violating the basic bill of rights at a state level and federal level. And declaration of MT rights.
 
THE JUDGE DURING COURT PROCEDURES INCRIMINATED HIS SELF BY STATING THAT HIS COURT DOES NOT RECOGNIZE THE CONSTITUTION.
The the judge said in trial that the state of Montana does not recognize the Constitution. {Count 1Title 18 US 241,242, 1628, 2183. and other titles under title 42 US}
1/ Excluding evidence discovery of provisions. REFUSED during court. THE STATUES AND CODES ON OFFICERS COMPLAINT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND WAS DECLARED BY THE PLAINTIFF, BUT IGNORED.
2/ Failed to protect provisions. BY MOVING FORWARD BY PASSING CONSTITUTIONAL MATTERS. And litigation mitigation behind the scenes.
3/ Failed to record court procedures- even though plaintiff has own records. NOT ALLOWING ON RECORD OR STRICKEN OFF RECORD.
4/ Failed to have court in a public hearing. Had court in a private court hearing away from public. MANIPULATING COURT HEARING TO LAST OF DOCKET IN PRIVATE NO PUBLIC WITNESS.
5/ Failed to appoint a competent attorney that would protect his provisions then failed to. Refused to answers plaintiff questions and paperwork filed.
Then by colluded attorneys excused and filed a motion to recuse there self. Then judge made attorney stand by for trial.
MORE THAN ONE ATTORNEY DID NOT WANT TO QUESTION THE CONSTITUTIONAL MATTERS. IGNORED THE ACTIONS VIOLATIONS OFF POLICE OFFICER ENCOUNTER TO INCRIMINATE THE PLAINTIFF.
6/ Attorneys and judge listed defendants colluded by EXCLUDING THROWN AWAY IGNORING DISCOVERY FINDINGS OF PAPERWORK. Without a legal determination. Ignored request to shift the burden of proof over jurisdiction in question.
7/ Ignoring the Miranda rights that is required by law, and probable cause in question. REFUSED TO ANSWER IN QUESTION OF RIGHTS READ BEFORE ARREST. OR OF TAKEN OF BLOOD BY TACTICAL MILITARY METHODS.
8/ Failed to comply to the request of the remedy and recourse of invoking Constitutional rights. REFUSED ALL CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDY AND CLAIMS AS THE BENEFICIARY AND OF THE PROTECTIONS REQUIRED BY LAW.
9/ Failed to protect the oath of office and the supremacy clause. REFUSED TO OBEY THE OATH AS TO PROTECT THE CLAIMED PLAINTIFFS PROVISIONS- AT ALL LEVELS. STATE AND FEDERAL.
10/ Violating there own statues codes of limitations of a speedy trial and the due process clauses. VIOLATED TIMELY MANNER FOR SPEEDY TRIAL. IGNORED *
11/ Failed to let plaintiff speak to protect his self or allow objections on the matter of a fair due process. THREATEN TO PUT IN PRISON BY JUDGE REARDON FOR THIRD PARTIES OPINION AND WITNESS. VIOLATED THE 5TH AMENDMENT AND THE 1ST AMENDMENT OF LIFE LIBERTY AND THE DUE PROCESS OF A FAIR AND IMPARTIAL TRIAL.
12/ COLLECTED ILLEGAL EVIDENCE BY THE EFFECT OF THE POISONOUS TREE BY PASSED EVIDENCE HEARING OVER ILLEGAL COLLECTED EVIDENCE THAT IS NOT ADMISSIBLE.

DISCOVERY OF FACTS OF THE SUPREME LAW
FAILURE TO PROTECT PROVISIONS IS A CRIME
Provisions of claimed contract clearly cannot be ignored. This would be a crime itself by not protecting the supreme law of the land that you are to protect. Count 1-Title 18 US Code Sec. 2381: In the PRESENCE of two or more witnesses of the same overt act, or in an open court of law, if you fail to timely move to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States and honor your oath of office, you are subject to the charge of capital felony treason.
Count 2- Title 5 US Code Sec. 556(d), Sec. 557, Sec.706: Courts lose jurisdiction if they do not follow Due Process Law. By ignoring the discovery and thresh-hold questions pertaining to the due-process denied, and appointed attorneys and judges under collusion to violate the separations of powers.
Therefore, a conflict of interest for civil records- the listed judge and parties make money across the bench for every infraction and unconstitutional acts that are enforced -have equity of $18 (eighteen dollars) for every $40 (forty dollars) that comes across the bench of collusion. Conflict of interest/civil v criminal/court state trying to create a crime or convert provisions into a crime.
By stealthy state regulations and codes and statues that are in conflict with the plaintiff’s provisions under the protection’s that are guaranteed by the Constitutional contract, under agreement between the American people and the government. Powers delegated to the listed violators judges and lawyers and police officers- for ignoring provisions they swear to protect either by intent or error.
The listed parties ARE ALLEGED that committed treason by sedition- Count 1 charge – and Count 2 charge - sedition by breaking down the Constitutional laws. Those who do this have no judicial immunity. Title 18 US Code Section 2381. If upon conviction they are subject to a $10,000 fine-10 years in prison or both and if theft is results life in prison.
Who says so? Owen v. Independence 100 vol. supreme court reports.1398 ; (1982) Main v.Thiboutot100 vol. Supreme Court Reports. 2502:(1982)--deprivation under the color of law. Officers have no immunity when violating Constitutional rights from liability. SEE ATTACHED SELF RECORDS OF PAPERWORK AND DISCOVERY OF PROVISIONS THAT THE COURTS ARE TO PROTECT BUT REFUSED TO PROTECT.
THE LISTED DEFENDANTS ALONG TOGETHER Excluded ALL documents that would mitigate or litigate the OUTCOME OF A UNFAIR ILLEGAL TRIAL WITH OUT CONSENT of the plaintiff involved with this matter. Refusing to give equal equal protections of the law.
By violating the 14th Amendment and all provisions listed in complaint and further not giving a fair due process under the 7th Amendment-And of course not a speedy trial. Clearly the judge did not protect the oath that he promised to preserve and be bound to and did not protect the provisions brought to his attention. No provisions can be denied or diminished.
Due to the facts of discovery -by actions - He denied the listed provisions and continued in favor of violating the plaintiff rights. DURING COURT PROCEDURES THE JUDGE SAID MONTANA DOES NOT RECOGNIZE THE CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES IN THE SUBMITTED PAPERWORK.
No one has immunity when violating or breaking down the laws they swear to protect especially when they have taken a oath under delegated powers granted by the people they serve. CLEARLY THE JUDGE AND LISTED DEFENDANTS VIOLATED OATH{Under Article 6 paragraph 2}
The supremacy clause -TREASON BY BREAKING DOWN SUPREME LAWS.- BY SEDITION BY constructive fraud. The undersigned being first duly sworn upon oath states the following facts showing obstructing of the plaintiff’s Constitutional rights.
By the listed parties violating provisions- misconduct -criminal collusion and breaking down the laws claimed. Breach of Constitutional Contract that is to be safe guarded by the judge, and secured in by the locked 9th Amendment at a state and federal level.
{See attached paperwork ignored and tossed away* dismissal grounds*complaint of taken off record*} {objection for legal determination*} {see pain and suffering claim}
 
Comes now that we the people the private person Stanley Roberts request that the 21 DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL AND FBI * ATF* HOMELAND SECURITY * TRUMP ADMINISTRATION * US MARSHALS OFFICE * THE HEAD OF THE SHERIFF DEPARTMENT * DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE *
To investigate the procedures findings of the LOWER inferior courts for treason by the breaking down of the laws of the provisions- Constitutional provision- supremo law of the land.Thank you for your candid work for preserving and protecting life limb and property and the Constitutional provisions at a state and federal level. {INGODWETRUST MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN}
 
{The claimed beneficiary}__________________________________________.
{ADVOCATE/Finding/WITNESS}______________________________________________.
{CONTRACT VIOLATION AT A STATE AND FEDERAL LEVEL THAT ARE LOCKED IN BY ENUMERATED POWERS DELEGATED/ LOCKED BY THE 9TH AMENDMENT/ AND THE 10TH AMENDMENT// Statement lower language/ encroachment infringement/violations of the bill of rights at a state level and federal level, MT provisions sections listed in complaint/due process clauses in the Constitutional provisions. /406 207-5002 Stanley John Roberts - i attached the objections and during court they ignored the objections and the three times of asking for jurisdiction to be answered./They excluded paperwork of the record and did not keep records, and the judge and attorneys are working in collusion and stealing his rights that they are to protect. and furthermore from the beginning they ignored all paper work Stanly submitted, dismissal and grounds and complaint. and before all of this he was arrested put in jail and tricked into a hidden unknown contract- and forced to take a blood test from military tactics of scaring individuals. without no attorney present/criminal charges title 18 US 241 242 1628 2183, and title 42 us. sedition of treason FAILING TO PROTECT GUARANTEED PROVISIONS AT A STATE AND FEDERAL LEVEL.
{Request counter claim for 50,000 dollars per violations proven in a court of law} No judge or attorneys can ignore the law or be above the law, they are to protect the law and know the difference between actual law v illegal unconstitutional act. Who says so- the people say so-the law says so. {Marbury v Madison 5 U.S. 137}{Where rights secured by the constitution are involved there can be no rule or law making legislation which would abrogate abolish them Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436} Section 34. Unenumerated rights. The enumeration in this constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to /deny, impair, or disparage others retained by the people. /Section 35. Servicemen, servicewomen, and veterans. The people declare that Montana servicemen, servicewomen, and veterans may be given special considerations determined by the legislature.Section 31. Ex post facto, obligation of contracts, and irrevocable privileges. No ex post facto law nor any law /impairing the obligation of contracts, or making any irrevocable grant of special privileges, franchises, or immunities, shall be passed by the legislature/ Section 11. Searches and seizures. The people shall be secure in their persons, papers, homes and effects from /unreasonable searches and seizures. No warrant to search any place, or seize any person or thing shall issue without /describing the place to be searched or the person or thing to be seized, or without probable cause, supported by oath or /affirmation reduced to writing/ Section 10. Right of privacy. The right of individual privacy is essential to the well-being of a free society and shall not be infringed without the showing of a compelling state interest. Constitution of Montana -- Article II –
DECLARATION OF RIGHTS/ Section 3. Inalienable rights. All persons are born free and have certain inalienable rights. They include the right to /a clean and healthful environment and the rights of pursuing life's basic necessities, enjoying and defending their lives /and liberties, acquiring, possessing and protecting property, and seeking their safety, health and happiness in all lawful /ways. In enjoying these rights, all persons recognize corresponding responsibilities./ 1 (a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. (b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under 2the United States.
As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States. 18 USC § 2071 2 it is settled law that delivery of a p leading to a proper official is sufficient to constitute filing thereof . United States v. Lombardo, 241 U.S. 73, 36 S. Ct. 508, 60 L. Ed. 897 (1916); Milton v. United States, 105 F.2d 253, 255 (5th Cir. 1939). In Greeson v. Sherman, 265 F. Supp. 340 (D.C.Va.1967) it was held that a pleading delivered to a deputy clerk at his home at night was thereby "filed." (Freeman v. Giacomo Costa Fu Adrea, 282 F. Supp. 525 (E.D.Pa. 04/5/1968/11 DISCOVERY/dispute but shall not act in a manner that coerces any party into settlement. *** Threaten prison time or jail time to force anyone to do what he or she wants during a court proceeding. Telling plaintiff not to file any paperwork in his court. COMMENT [1] The right to be heard is an essential component of a fair and impartial system of justice. Substantive rights of litigants can be protected only if procedures protecting the right to be heard are observed. [2] The judge plays an important role in overseeing the settlement of disputes, but should be careful that efforts to further settlement do not undermine any party’s right to be heard according to law}
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31zRfrGU0P4
http://www.montanaconstitution.com/index.php?title=ARTICLE_II._DECLARATION_OF_RIGHTS

What is COLLUSION?
A deceitful agreement or compact between two or more persons, for the one party to bring an action against the other for some evil purpose, as to defraud a third party of his right Cowell. A secret arrangement between two or more persons, whose interests are apparently conflicting, to make use of the forms and proceedings of law in order to defraud a third person, or to obtain that which justice would not give them, by deceiving a court or it officers. Baldwin v. New York, 45 Barb. (N. Y.) 359; Belt v. Blackburn, 28 Md. 235; Railroad Co. v. Gay. 8G Tex. 571, 26 S. W. 599, 25 L. R. A. 52; Balch v. Beach, 119 Wis. 77, 95 N. W. 132. In divorce proceedings, collusion is an agreement between husband and wife that one of them shall commit, or appear to have committed, or be represented in court as having committed, acts constituting a cause of divorce, for the purpose of enabling the other to obtain a divorce. Civil Code Cal
Related Legal Terms
ACTIONABLE FRAUD, FRAUD ARE, FRAUD, MATERIAL FRAUD, INTRINSIC FRAUD, FRAUD IN THE INDUCEMENT, CONTRACTOR FRAUD, CONSUMER FRAUD, AFFINITY FRAUD, BADGE OF FRAUD
What is CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD?
1.an unintended deception. 2. getting legal advantage through unfair means. The poor, ignorant, and weak are targeted. The court may set aside an agreement due to the unreasonable terms of the contract.
What is BREACH OF THE PEACE?
A violation of the public tranquillity and order. The offense of breaking or disturbing the public peace by any riotous, forcible, or unlawful proceeding. 4 Bl. Comm. 142. ct scq.; People v. Bartz, 53 Mich. 493, 19 X. W. 161; State v. White, 18 R. I. 473, 28 Atl. 968; People v. Wallace. 85 App. Div. 170, 83 N. Y. Supp. 130; Scougale v. Sweet, 124 Mich. 311, 82 N. W. 1061. A constructive breach of the peace is an unlawful act which, though wanting the elements of actual violence or injury to any person, is yet inconsistent with tiie peaceable and orderly conduct of society. Various kinds of misdemeanors are included in this general designation, such as sending challenges to fight, going armed in public without lawful reason and in a threatening manner, etc. An apprehended breach of the peace is caused by the conduct of a man who threatens another with violence or physical injury, or who goes about in public with dangerous and unusual weapons in a threatening or alarming manner, or who publishes an aggravated libel upon another, etc.

What is MISCONDUCT?
Any unlawful conduct on the part of a person concerned in the ad- ministration of justice which is prejudicial to the rights of parties or to the right deter- mination of the cause; as “misconduct of jurors,” “misconduct of an arbitrator.” The term is also used to express a dereliction from duty, injurious to another, on the part of one employed in a professional capacity, as an attorney at law, (Stage v. Stevens, 1 Denio [N. Y.] 267,) or a public officer, (State v. Leach, 60 Me. 58, 11 Am. Rep. 172.)

{Seal}

LaKrisha berry's picture

With out any accuations or repot of abuse. CPS in oregon ingnored the 100% true fact that me and my feonce was opperating in a regular nuclear family. They had to go back over 25 years for my fiance and something that I did when I was 12 years old they brought up what they don't have is a present accusation the report that my kids were in danger. Me my fiance and my kids have been together for over a year me and my daughters were homeless during that time I want you the same people CPS in Eugene Oregon and ask them for help three times they said that I'm just fine you're mentally stable enough you'll be okay shortly after that I met my now fiance. He volunteer Lee became homeless because he had roommates so me and my daughters will not sleep under the stars or in dangerous places he works 40 hours a week devoted 100% of his income is time and his vehicle for the well-being of me and my daughters three months of hotel stays a lot things to my now fiance we now live in a 3-bedroom house. I have a mental illness two of them that have not interfered with me taking care of my kids they are healthy that go to school everyday they're very happy kids. I checked myself into the Johnson unit and Eugene Oregon cement award voluntarily sign over custody to my fiance but because my fiance is an ex-con and he's on probation but has shown to fill the role of their father and came into our lives and made our lives better than any person I've met in my life CPS still says that he's a danger. My fiance hasn't public record 02 or an acre score that's what they call it in Oregon. My fiance has not been in trouble in almost 30 years in fact he's done all his prison time without one right up got out of jail after a long time at a job a house in the car within two weeks of coming home now it's back in 2011. I wish I have met him then. CPS is also going back to when I was 12 years old where I'm pretty sure my mental illness developed when I was young. They are discriminating against me saying that I'm uncapable of taking care of my kids and keeping them safe using very as one of the examples even though it's after the fact that he showed otherwise with the true present fact of the matter that he has been there father figure for over a year. They're discriminating against my 14th and 4th amendment rights I think. Shelton Berry said that he has lost faith in the state and definitely CPS. So we want to move it to the federal courts because this is a clear case of the violation of our civil rights due process seizure and possible RICO Act by CPS they don't have no good track record in Oregon in fact I read something that said they are responsible for more murders child molestations rapes and mistreatment of kids than any single person in the United States. So please tell me how to proceed we want the kids back because after over a month a new case worker took over the case and is now saying that they are scared of Shelton Berry that they had to hide under the bed for hours because they were scared . But the question I asked to the new case worker was that my daughter's don't know the difference between an hour a second in a minute they don't use them terms and also the two beds in their room is flat on the ground so it's impossible for them to hide under the bed. Shelton Berry told him that this is adult level deception. Shelter Berry also ask him how is the questions being asked because their comments is utterly ridiculous and probably was coached and he also said if he finds out that they're being co Hurst he's going to sue the CPS worker. Now I just see my daughter a few days ago she came in and told me without me even asking her and I'm pretty sure they were video or audio taping it because I only can see my daughter in this weird looking wrong or people could look through one area of the glass but you can't see him on other side she came and told me without asking that she told the truth I fell. Remember there was no report of abuse. Just CPS coming up with ideas based on my already existing mental illness in which I was taking care of my kids and my fiance's almost 30 years ago conviction and when she hasn't been in trouble since to prove their case. Isn't there a law against any caseworker especially the one that's lying about asking them questions when in fact either he's doing it or he sending the second person to do it so he won't get in trouble. And why would the kids right now at this moment start talking about how scared they are almost 2 months after the fact that they were taking around the same time that this new case worker came into play that bought them ice cream. Is it possible to petition the court for an emergency injunction to freeze the state of any more actions until a federal investigation was launched and in the meantime move the kids from State custody to Federal custody to protect them from being coerced and possibly tearing the family apart because of me voluntarily seeking help for my mental illness

YAHUAH IS MY ONLY HOPE's picture

Apparently, I am not the only one here who has been deceived and I'm sure I will not be the last!
What's sad was that my baby was taken from me 3 days after giving birth in the hospital by DCF. I didn't get chance to bring him home nor breast feed him. I was further threatened, that if, I didn't terminate my parental rights for my other son; that he would be put in a group home for the rest of his life. To this day, I suffer in silence. As if, I am alone in this battle.
I thought this was America people and that our so-called democracy or so-called justice system protects against injustice of this nature. We have all been duped. Truth be told, truth be known that silent weapons and quiet wars, are being waged against us and our precious children!
I am not criminal nor do I have a criminal record. But criminals are hiding in plain sight; behind the powers that be, utilizing our children-for-profit. Please tell me, anyone that's out there...how can we stop this and how can I get my sons back? 
This is not just my problem, it's our problem as a whole!

rosanbala's picture

It is "our problem as a whole" and it might be starting to sink in that "we the people" will have to bond and be active in stand against the manipulations of the Bar and judicial and not allow the abuses of totalitarian government...and establishment with special privilege under the law... The conspiracy of silence and stonewall of the victim and the isolation are common practice.   The methods: the violence and "obscene"  threats against your  rights (taking your baby?) and perhaps defaming and possibly criminalizing you are common pratice of the establishment/"law.". "silent weapons and quiet wars" are being waged; it's all so true.  stonewalled isolated not allowed to know of events and  the bill of rights all violated.  ..  the founding fathers saw this coming and that's why we join NLA to stop this tyranny, hopefully...it seems like their earlier supports might have been squashed by government threats, too. (I'm guessing)    I don't know how to help and though I don't have children am in a similar situation of violence against rights and stonewall and silence and pretending nothing happened and for me work the gaslighting and dementia  political warfare and psychopolitical warfare.   I can suggest some links and research... also look at the Laura Cain and Fremont county messages below  in this comment section.. I call the  hot lines and warm lines..it seems like those w/o a "family" of support are targeted. rmbalaun@juno.com ... people I've known for years and family are somehow by choice or manipulation??  forced to silence and cover up; police do not help they are part of the abuse of power despite many officers of "good intent.'  you might talk to Inform NH, just type in and court room observers on NLA  also there are other courtroom observers that might be able to help.

rosanbala's picture

addendum : also there is a web site for the court room watch group ...courtroomwatch.com  NLA has a ciourt room observers group too. It's under Members on the blue bar at top of page. there's a discussion group tonight at 7 Mountain time.  See other 7-26 comment scroll down page: has address to send info will post if credible  and do blog talk.
 

Llcain69's picture

Anyone...Please help. I already spoke to civil rights attorneys. I know I have a case but this has been going on for 2 years now and I don't know if anything can be done at this point. I really need help. CPS had the Sheriff's Office arrest me on trumped-up charges. They falsified UA results on me because of my past, and I can prove it. It's in my police report. My state-appointed attorney will do nothing to help me. This is a vendetta against me because I beat them the last time and you DON'T beat CPS. It's unheard of here. I don't know where to even begin. This is all so overwhelming but quite possibly the most amazing site I have ever come across!!!
PLEASE...GOOGLE FREMONT COUNTY COLORADO POLICE CORRUPTION!!! SO MANY OF US HERE NEED HELP, IMMEDIATELY. OUR CHILDREN NEED HELP....
Thank you...

margaret3000's picture

I have over 60 hours of research into the proceedures and understand how local, state and federal work fairly well. I helped my stepdaughter in her case here in california. I wrote a request to the court which followed with them asking if I was an attorney. I was later told I could not attend hearings. Eventually I followed the money, and after realizing they were not performing  the required process for federal funding I called the Federal person  that oversaw my countys CPS office. I spoke in their language as IT IS A WORD GAME and within hours the supervisor of my daughters was calling me to arrange to come out and do her job. It took over 9 months to figure it all out.
If you want to feel free to send me a copy of any and all hearing reports that you have. Please redact any personal information you dont want to me to see. If you redact names in the report please identify them by their relationship to you (ie if you redacted your sons name just write SON over the redaction so I can still understand the report. Then if you could explain your side and what you believe they have done or not done during the process. It is possible I may see something they are not doing policy wise. My email is mgbell140@yahoo.com.

LaKrisha berry's picture

Here is a contact number. Lakrishia berry phone number 458-234-1552 or Berry .541-654-6038

rosanbala's picture

did you talk with court observers NLA? All this stuff stinks to high heavens... enslavement is not a myth in US  I'm afraid prosperity is making the idea of helping someone else against a government led /citizen supported atrocity  a threat to security and peace which is coming before truth and justice and liberty...  Jan Markell had some good stuff on this weekend  whether you're rapture oriented or not a last days follower. 

Llcain69's picture

I'm sorry, I'm new to this site and not sure how it works or if your comment was meant for me. Fremont County CO is a terrifying place to live these days. I believe at last count 16-18 officers had been placed on administrative leave, only to be hired back again. They oversee themselves, answer to no one. There is multiple filings of cover-ups and altering paperwork. Complete corruption. There was evidence from the murder of a 17-yr old girl found in a storage unit belonging to a detective. He got 2 misdemeanor charges and a petty offense. It is rumored the girl said to officers she had seen them taking envelopes from known drug dealers...and shortly there after she was killed by at least 3 different guns. Next to where she was killed was her babies crib...it had shell casings in it. She was 17 years old, she had excelled in school had full scholarships and was going to go to school for law. Her head was nearly completely blown away. I have been fighting them for some time now. Now I cannot get a job, housing has been stripped from me, and DHS has had my children for 2 years. The police were just here searching for my 14 yr old who has been on the run since April. Can they get a warrant to search for a runaway? (Asking for a friend...). If your comments were meant for me, thank you. I need some sort of direction and this helps. I appreciate it...

rosanbala's picture

 Sorry  .. I live in kansas but don't know much... There is the Rutherford institute John Whitehead  It's in Charlottesville VA  he wrote Battlefield America.. All the establishment here will work with the attorneys and court and law enforcement and "they're right".....  Gosh I wish i could help... they all gang up there?? and no one to go to? Hope you get some more answers.  Hope NLA can help?? did you go to the CPS site on NLA site?? try going on the discussion group  call tonight/thursday  at 7 mountain time. it's under reality check on the dark bar at top of NLA page.... https://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/child-perpetrating-services. Have you tried a state coordinator of CO for ideas? in the directory State Attorney general here doesn't help the People when  the "Establishment."  is the 'agressor"  etc. 

Llcain69's picture

Thank you for the information. It gives me some sort of direction. I will try your suggestions. Thank you again, very much.

rosanbala's picture

Freemont county; There is a web site that you could contact.. send info to courtroomwatch@gmail  they will post if it is credible..... can do a braodcast on blogtalk studio 1776.org   I'm the person from Kansas.   my e mail is rmbalaun@juno.com  they have people in colorado but they are "in a fight" and lock up i think..  also there is the ACLJ ... not U, J  for justice ....

Llcain69's picture

 
I apologize for my delayed response. I'm not sure I completely understand. This is all a bit overwhelming. If you have time, could you email me, please? LLCAIN69@gmail.com.
Thanks so much!!

Beaver Reaper's picture

Just finished a 9 month jail sentence for doing what my heart knows is right, standing up for our 2nd amendment.  Now I can't let fear of evil tyrants run my life. So I stand up, dust off, learn from all of it. My property was taken. I'm gonna need it back. Will give notice to trespasser as a man to see if he knows what good men do.
 

ihashblox's picture

Congrats on your release... 
 
Somethings to consider.
1. If you where jailed because of a 2 Amendment right, did you declare right to habeus corpus?
2. If the government takes a right and sells it back to you (licensure) can you not ask for redress?
3. Look to see if any of these would pertain to your historical circumstance ( 42 USC 1983, 1985, 1986).
 
Best of luck

Beaver Reaper's picture

 
 

publiclands's picture

On www.educationalfamilyestateapps.com under "our products" and under the topic of "American Indian probate" there is extensive commentary about how voluntary legal Guardianship can prevent state based abuses. While it was discussed around the abuses of the Indian Child Welfare Act in unduly removing American Indian children from their homes / families, the basic discussion about voluntary legal Guardianship applies to any parent / grandparent. It must be created prior to the purported trigger causing state jurisdiction over a child. Once the state gets involved it is nearly impossible to stop the intervention. Ironically, in the cases where states should interfere it seems they don't (or we hear of abuses that went on for years and no one or nothing seemed to care). I still want to believe that all parents just want the best for their children and they have the best insight as to who would be the best guardian in those situations when a parent dies or can't be there. 

Tom Ballard's picture

Does anyone have proper format for this. She has already challenged jurisdiction in chains and " judge" entered a plea anyway after he said in open court she was under  a statutory jutisdiction being  charged crimanaly. She needs to get out as so to gain access to law!! Asap 

masoncerritos's picture

I am on social media as @commonlaw on Steemit. I have figured out a way for committee's of safety to make a income promoting American values and teaching the law. I also have learned that as a matter of the Achilles "Heal of man that people are being indoctrinated away from societies morals. Not to be dramatic, but common sense and sanity in our society is what is at stake. I am totally willing to give my idea to the committee's as a small payment in the vested interest of our society. No charge, no trade, no barter. Just the information that will allow the committee's to generate a income and get the word out. Power of the county sheriff has my phone number. Please call between 9:00 Am - 10:00 PM pacific time.

deckape's picture

I called and left you a message on your fund raiser comments. Please give me a call at your leisure. 

Patrick Hansen's picture

***EMERGENCY PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT......UPDATE***
 
First I want to thank everyone for looking into this and helping me with investigating Arizona DCS injustice relating to my children and their unlawful and unwarranted removal.
 
Summary of events for people looking to be witnesses to this case.
Arizona assumed emergency jurisdiction and granted temporary placement of my three children in Arizona DCS custody.
There was an open hearing & teleconference with the judge in Arizona and the judge in New York working on this case. The DCS from New York did not even appear for the hearing neither in person nor by counsel. The Judge in New York surrendered Jurisdiction of the case that New York CPS maliciously filed over to the judge in the Arizona Juvenile Dependency Court.
 
Arizona DCS is still ignoring and refusing to return our children or place them with family/next of kin. They are ignoring the facts that the law requires them to place with next of kin. They are ignoring the fact that my sisters both have clearances of fingerprints, background checks, and foster training.
So the next hearing is open to the public and the case number is JD2018-00070 Pinal County Superior Court in Florence Arizona. It is scheduled for this Thursday April 5th 2018 at 1:30pm. Anyone who plans to attend should arrive 10min. early and check in with the clerk as to what court room the case will be heard.
 
The purpose of this hearing is for a probable cause evidentiary review to determine if there existed probable cause for the DCS employees to have taken my children, or to continue the emergency temporary custody in with Arizona DCS.
The facts are clear and convincing for any reasonable person to recognize that there does not exist clear and convincing evidence that probable cause existed or could possibly still exist warranting and justification to keep them from returning home, or being placed with next of kin.
 
I would ask that people not call the case workers, or the clerks to be burdensome/annoying outside of just checking in on the case to find out time and place. I recognize people are outraged and very upset about the criminally negligent behavior of these people responsible for all this unnecessary trauma, but we can be more effective with written accounts and reports, to follow up with claims and eventually removal to a 1983 action in district court. We need to keep our composure and be peaceful but persistent.
 
Hope to see you there.
 
 
 
 
 
"The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing." -Albert Einstein

"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent" -Thomas Jefferson
 
 “He who does not oppose evil, commands it to be done” -Leonardo Da Vinci

Normal
0

false
false
false

EN-US
X-NONE
X-NONE

/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin-top:0in;
mso-para-margin-right:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:8.0pt;
mso-para-margin-left:0in;
line-height:107%;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}

Lionheart's picture

I share this for everyone (and there is such a sad number of these tales) who is facing the dragon you are facing. I've been using what some would call the Karl Lentz method for numerous lesser problems and have had great success. I've never had to fight the state for my children though. However Lentz has, so I'm putting this forth with that in mind. In essence, if you file a claim, as a (wo)man, making a claim that those kids are your property (proper to you, the other parent, and no other), you can then demand that any other man or woman with a claim to those kids must come to court (a common law court of record) and present their claim. Of course no man or woman will be able to do that so you can then demand to have your property returned to you. I'm simplifying it all of course, but the notices and the filing are actually pretty simple: common law is supposed to be simple. If this is an approach you want ot know more about please contact me and I'll put you in touch with the man I worked with to learn it. He fought for his kids too. Alternatively you can begin with audios of Lentz (much on Craig Lynch's youtube) on the subject. May God be with you in this struggle. 

Llcain69's picture

I've heard about this, but I'm skeptical. Does it really work??

PatAZMaricopa's picture

If you do not receive a response within two working days, submit a written communication by email or mail outlining your concerns.  Keep a record of your calls and/or a copy of your written correspondence.
STEP 2:  ELEVATE YOUR CONCERN TO THE DCS SUPERVISOR
If your attempt to resolve your concerns with the case specialist fails, contact the DCS Supervisor.  Follow the same process in attempting to speak with the supervisor.
If step 2 fails, proceed to step 3
STEP 3:  CONTACT THE DCS OMBUDSMAN'S OFFICE
The DCS Office of the Ombudsman assists parents and guardians who are involved with DCS, their families and other interested parties when they are dissatisfied with services, actions or lack of actions, or their treatment by DCS staff.  The DCS Office of the Ombudsman will review your complaint and determine the type of response needed.  Have you contacted the DCS supervisor? What was the results of your attempt to resolve your issues? If that failed have you contacted the Ombudsman?

Bring Madylin Home's picture

Like many before me. How do I fight CPS and the lies submitted to the courts to take a child from her father and adult brother both local to child both ignored by Judge in court sure to PURJURY of CPS employee.
 

Kimberly houston's picture

Need legal help to examen the mater this is not acceptable to parents rights

Donna Lee 49's picture

My daughter has endured a divorce from a disordered minded person. Her 3 children have been alienated from her. as a result she isworking with others going through similar situations. the family courts are there only to get rich, in my opinion. 
We are working Pro Se and learning as we go. 
Willing to help any way I can.

Randall's picture

i had been away for a while, my email Rmoss69@hotmail.com i am writing to see if there is any ground being made with NLA and these fraudulent government want to be entities DFCS/CPS, i also have questions for NLA leaders, beings NLA has a common law Jury can i admit my evidence to the common law jury even if i had to fly to new york or take a bus to make a live oath of affirmation in front of the common law jury, been away so long trying to fight and find nothing but corrupt administrators, and can the NLA help me re write my papers, 2016 i tried to get into court again before the judge dismissed my claim he did add the county lawyer to my claim, i believe the door is now open for the federal district courts, i am in process sending a evidence package to the D.O.J. civil rights department and to the D.O.J. disability department and evidence is highlightted, also sending to congressman Drew Ferguson all 3 the same package if there is any real help out there feel free to call 770-233-8697 or send me a email thanks randall

FamilyRights's picture

 CPS in Wisconsin  Took children away on a report allegedly made &  reported to the agency. I can prove that in fact on that date their alleged report that was called and could not of happened and in fact what was reported as falaw. how do I get my children back ?  CPS is trying to make me seem mentally unstable so that nobody believes what I am saying and also to try and prove that I am emotionally damaging my children. I need help on how to  Bring all the truth to The judge....

Lady lopez's picture

I am out of words and dont know what to do anymore. See i had a case open agaisnt me for abuse and neglect by cps supposely then they said it was for neglectful supervision then they had false results paper work and statements dont add up. They took my kids they violated our rights and they commintted fraud on the court and feaud upon the court. I never abused my children yet i didnt abuse my children the way cps wanted me to and they took them since in the states care they been abused. They also commiteed forgery saying id volunteer to give up my parental rights ive contacted everybody from the FBI, texas rangers, oca, attorney general, senator, interal affairs, i have hard evidences i have audio paper worker and no one sseems to want to help me what can i do i have no outlets please someone tell me what to do...
Imagine that 6.4 out of 100,000 children die in the hands of the same agency that suppose to protect them while only 1.4 out of 100,000 children die in general population. If you a parent what would you do??

Ninigx7's picture

i am attempting to file a habeas corpus for my children.  This kangaroo court system is beyond mindblowing.  I was denied due process and to obtain my children cps recorded fraud in the courts to obtain a warrant.  When I confronted the matter is was dismissed and an extension to the jurisdiction hearing held.  They were taken 8/28 and one hour late I was arrested for felony gun charges.  in jail and missed court for the kids and even asked for marand.  Dismissed of the charges at pretrial and still no car gun property and children gone.  Please help

PBAnoneNCorp's picture

I'm just a father who's ex wife had cps take my daughters .cps contacts me I show up to court I explained to them that I would be leaving my daughters with my mother and step father for a couple weeks if not longer .until I got a place because I was or am still renting a room just needed some time .my parents complained to cps that they didn't want them any longer and they came with Warren to only give them back but to my parents and talked my parents into getting a restraining order on me because of how I acted angry in court because of the fact they took my custody away and now I can't see my kids for 6 months and I never did any thing wrong and it feels like my own family is plotting against me this whole time to get my parental rights taken away help what do I do please this whole thing has got me torn and hurting with not a clue as to what to do please any one if you have a heart help me

Shawna Coats's picture

If someone gives you any advice on how to handle this situation please forward it to me im experiencing the same situation myself

mrbagobeans's picture

What advice are seeking a remedy to?. if it is a CPS issue I suggest that it is better to not fight them. It ends up hurting and making the situation worse most times. That is why we seek Habeas Corpus for incarcerated people and such. At least the system can't make their situation worse. They are already a ward of the State.

Imapeople's picture

I was very active with the bla a year ago but the courts got should of my daughter in which I tried to help her and the courts denied me the right of counsel for her and tossed her in jail and told her she would not be let out unless she took a public defender to assist her in court. She did as they demanded and they put her through the ringer and is now on probation. Well I've got in a fender bender and tried using the constitution and all the jurisdiction tacti s and was flat out denied every immunity that I set into motion. Telling the court that the ticket was a bill of attained and post exactly law which they used against me and now I'm back in court for a speeding ticket in which I was test driving a car to fix its performance issues. I slowed the car and then accelerated and with my luck a cop came around the corner and radiated me 16 miles over the speed limit and there was no telling him why so I tried the courts and have been stuffed ridiculed and forced to sign a contract to enter into a trial with these crooks. I'm afraid they are going to hit me with everything imaginable and this 200 dollar ticket will cost me a grand or better. I need some guidance because I wasn't being malicious and there is no injured party and no damages to anything but this judge threatened me with contempt if I spoke out in court and told me that all my paper work would have to be entered into the court per statutory rules and procedures or it would not be excepted. Learning what I have about common law is great but these people will not have none of this and I'm kinda screwed. Please help.

Lostsoul67's picture

thanks to you I have been reading as much as I can ! I have 2 cases in pa (legal aid asses) that want me to ple !! I refuse to . I have tried to get / put in paper work on my own in the courts but well they look at me like I'm nuts . I don't even get phone calls back from these lawers (2 counties) I am on the boarder . The one thing I know is right from wrong and I am being wronged. I watched a state trooper lie under oath in my accident case ( my car was my home) I am so stressed offer the lack of justice , I will not plea I would rather die fighting in Pa

rosanbala's picture

Hope you are still kicking  just saw your message.... of the 15th august......  you sound one of us marked and whatever you do will be "nuts" or they pretend that anyway...  I know about law enforcement, too and the suuport they give to the overlords..  in dissembling etc...even the officers that are "good" ......  Proud of you for not taking the plea..  you sound brave and up against a unified establishment including lawyers and law enforcement....  god bless/  I hope you stil have your car and maybe a roof by some miracle??    rose ann

Lostsoul67's picture

its been hard because of my helth,and i found you all,and now about the gmo's wll lets say my heath is bleak. and of course i just got into another accedent with my moms car.3 kids ,2 took off (wonder why lol) but im sure i will bet blamed for this also .(same state police distruct) Ya know sometimes i just wish my body wood give out i barley have the strenght to right you. so i will do my best but i look like scke;eton of a lepord with lots of open sores :..(

Lowell Higlet's picture

The only time I have been in a court of Law was when I had the duty guarding a Prisoner.  I have become aware that the Courts no longer are Common Law Court.  Nor are the Admerality Courts.  They do not like to admit that they are under UCC.  I am frightened that when We The People are required to go before the court. we are not Innocent until proven Guilty.  
I have watched to U-Tube video on the NLA Writ of Mandamus and the Quo Warrento of 2014.  That is unheard of!
The only reason I think I would find myseld in front of a Judge is because of my right to travel.  I do not have a drivers license or plates on my Jeep.  It has been that way fo r nearly two years.
Aanother, worse reason, is my carrying a Firearm and I find that I had to defend myself or another person.  The way I am looking at it now is that I will not have to worry about the Courts.  There will be another War in this country.  I do hope that it does not happen in my life time.
Lowell Higley 

Lowell Higlet's picture

I have been reading the Constitution for the last five years.  Hard wirk.  It is because of our present Government and the way the Constitution is violated.   Listening and reading Carl Miller, i had to do something.  Found him on line.  This year I found the NLA.  This year, I also found Howaed Freeman.  A different way the courts deal wih the Common Law.   1938 and the UCC.  Frighting.
"There will be no mention of the Constitution in this court."  Carl Miller says that is treason - by the Judge!  I do not know how to fix that.  I really do not want to find myself in jail for contempt of court.  Or worse!
Also, I am old and do not have the money to take the course (a lot of money. Never mind the money is not worth anything) the NLA said I should.  
When I was younger I worked the county jail because the regular man got sick.  Been there.  Done that.  No thanks.
I have known for a nuimber of years that the country is bankrubt.  Most of the People do not know or care.  It took 116 years to be in debt for 8 trillion and another eight years to be in debt for 19 trillion.  Why is the Federal government in dept?  I have not found the reason, or the reasons, why.
40 years ago, my Father advised me that there will be another war in this country.  A Mother Loving Shooting War!  I think he was correct.  That is one of the reasons I sought the NLA. Or aomething like it.  Hopwfully, there will be a change.  I do not think so!  The Ballot Box, I am advised, is the only recourse.  I think that is incorrect.  You can not beat Santa Clause.  Taking the property from one to give to another.  The distribution of wealth.
When I signed into the NLA I hit a incorrect key.  I do not know how to change that either.  On my last name, I would change the t to a y.
Please advise,
Lowell Higley