Lawless Government

Rep. Jason Chaffetz Introduces Bill To Disband Two Federal Law Enforcement Agencies

U.S. Forest Service And Bureau Of Land Management Law Enforcement Under Fire By Rep. Jason Chaffetz

Washington, DC – Utah Republican Congressman Jason Chaffetz has introduced two bills to remove police powers from the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the U.S Forest Service. The law enforcement responsibilities would then be transferred on to local sheriffs.

According to Free Range Report, Congressman Chaffetz issued a press release on January 24, 2017.  In that release, he said “It’s time to get rid of the BLM and US Forest Service police. If there is a problem your local sheriff is the first and best line of defense. By restoring local control in law enforcement, we enable federal agencies and county sheriffs to each focus on their respective core missions.”

His goal is to reduce and/or eliminate as much federal control as possible and give it back to local law enforcement. This comes after the highly publicized incident involving Cliven Bundy, who had a longstanding feud with the BLM.  It is ironic that both Bundy and the BLM were born in 1946.  But that is the only thing they have in common.  The feud involved Bundy paying fees to graze his cattle on BLM land, which began in 1973, according to The Las Vegas Journal.  Bundy believes that the right to graze his cattle on what he perceived to be his land goes back to the 1800’s when the area was first settled.

For 20 years, all was well.  Then, in 1993, without any notice, the BLM reduces Bundy’s herd size on the leased land, and also restricts where his cattle can graze.  Bundy refused the conditions and the BLM cancelled his permit.  In 1994, the BLM ordered Bundy to remove his cattle from the leased land.  And the ongoing dispute with the BLM continued until it led to an armed militia pointing guns at federal law enforcement officers. BLM backed down which emboldened the Bundys.

Bundy and sons then led an armed takeover of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge office in 2016.  Militia group members from across the nation joined together with the Bundys to stop what was perceived by them as unwanted and unwarranted federal intrusion.

The core of the issue is the idea that the Federal Government owns far too much land in the west; land, they say, which should belong to the States.

In the Congressman’s statement, he said that the bill would free up resources for the federal government by removing the law enforcement function from the BLM and giving it back to the local Sheriff’s Office.  Two other Utah Congressmen, Rep. Mia Love and Rep. Chris Stewart, jointly co-sponsored the bill, it also establishes funding for the extra resources that the local Sheriff’s Office would need, based on the amount of public land in each state.

According to the proposed bill, the BLM would save five percent in its annual budget and the Forest Service seven percent.  One of President Trump’s first acts was a federal hiring freeze, but that has been a first action by many previous Presidents.

Rep. Chaffetz acknowledged the long-standing tension between Utah ranchers and the BLM.  He said “Let’s not kid ourselves. The blood pressure is running high, especially in southern Utah, and I don’t want anyone to get killed,”  He also said that he wanted subpoenas issued to what he called “out of control” federal agencies to justify their need for submachine guns.

Setting aside the issues for how much land the U.S. owns and how they manage it, law enforcement officers appears to be taking the blame for federal policy. It’s like disbanding your local police force because you don’t like a law passed by the State legislature.

It’s important to remember that agencies like the U.S. Forest Service exist for a reason. If Forest Service Officers did not exist, no law enforcement officer would patrol the millions of square miles of National Forests. Providing more funding to the Sheriff’s departments to handle these areas would result in them handling calls in the area, but Sheriffs are unlikely to send their deputies out in the middle of nowhere where they would be unavailable to respond to calls in a timely manner.

The laws in the Forest Service and BLM areas of jurisdiction would be unlikely to be enforced with this plan, and maybe that’s the point. It leaves ones to wonder why they are only cutting enforcement.


Karmitty's picture


ATTORNEY'S LICENSE ???                                                                           AIN'T NO SUCH THING!!! 
I.     AS PER THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT;       A. The practice of Law CAN NOT be licensed by any state/State Schware v. Board  of Examiners, 353 U.S. 238, 239       B. The practice of Law is AN OCCUPATION OF COMMON RIGHT!       Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925)
II.    The "CERTIFICATE" from the State Supreme Court:        1. ONLY authorizes,        A. To practice Law "IN COURTS" As a member of the STATE JUDICIAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT.        B. Can ONLY represent WARDS OF THE COURT.        2. INFANTS        3. PERSONS OF UNSOUND MIND SEE CORPUS JURIS SECUNDUM, VOLUME 7, SECTION 4.        4. A. "CERTIFICATE" IS NOT A LICENSE....        A. To practice Law AS AN OCCUPATION.        B. Nor to DO BUSINESS AS A LAW FIRM!!!
III.    The "STATE BAR" CARD IS NOT A LICENSE!!!        A. It is a "UNION DUES CARD"        B. The "BAR" is a "PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION."        1. Like the Actors Union, Painters Union, etc.        2. No other association, EVEN DOCTORS, issue their own license.  ALL ARE ISSUED BY THE STATE.        C. It is a NON-GOVERNMENTAL PRIVATE ASSOCIATION.         1. See Attorney General Dan Morales' letter.         2. As per this letter; the State does not issue licenses and they are not issued by his office!
IV.    The State Bar is;        A. An Unconstitutional Monopoly, Article 1, Section 26, Texas Bill of Rights.        B. A  ILLEGAL & CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE;        C. Violates Article 2, Section 1, Separation of Powers clause of the Constitution.        D. There is NO POWER OR AUTHORITY for joining of Legislative, Judicial, or Executive as the BAR and SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS are doing.  ALL MEMBERS OF BOTH ARE MONOPOLISTIC BAR MEMBERS!        E. In violation of the RIGHT TO WORK LAWS of Texas.
V.    State Bar Rules. . . at Article III, Section 2. . .        Enrollment in the State Bar:  "Each person who becomes licensed to practice law is REQUIRED TO ENROLL IN THE STATE BAR WITHIN 10 DAYS "BEFORE" OR "AFTER" RECEIVING A LICENSE TO PRACTICE LAW.        ENROLLMENT IN THE BAR AND LICENSE ARE NOT THE SAME.  THE BAR CAN NOT LICENSE ANYONE!!!!!
        It is quite simple to see that a great fraud and conspiracy has been perpetrated on the people of Texas and America.  The American Bar is an offshoot from London Lawyers' Guild and was established by people with treasonous goals in mind.  They have accomplished 98% of their goals.  The NEW WORLD ORDER is in the saddle NOW.  American People start the job for them...or before their "NEW WORLD ORDER" bosses, the International Bankers, gain the remaining 2%.  Texas and American Lawyers should check historical records.  They will find that the first people "ELIMINATED" in a power shift (no matter who whines) are the lawyers and judges...for they always have proven themselves unworthy of any trust from either side!        "Woe unto you (A woe is a curse) Lawyers!  For you have taken away the key of knowledge; you entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in you hindered..."  Luke 11:52.VI.    The AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION TRAITORS IN OUR MIDST:         The founding Fathers who wrote our Constitution and formed our government, made it very clear that this was to be a FREE ENTERPRISE country and all Citizens are to be equal under Law and not a private capitalistic monopoly or cartel as they had experienced in Europe.        Under free enterprise system, any Citizen who was willing to risk his time and finances, can go into business.  The public with the freedom of choice, can patronize this business or decide they don't like the service or product and stay away; whereas, in a private or a capitalistic system, only the privileged elite can go into certain businesses or professions such as had been practiced in Europe for ages, making the public their CAPTIVE CUSTOMERS.        The EUROPEAN BANKERS and FINANCIAL CARTELS decided to change AMERICA to the same system that they had so they could take over this government too, and sent some British lawyers over here to organize an American Bar Association on the same order as the English Bar where only Lords can be Judges and determine who shall practice law.        In 1909 they incorporated this TRAITOROUS group in the state of Illinois and had the State Legislature (which was under the control of lawyers) pass an unconstitutional law that only members of this powerful union of lawyers, called the ABA, could practice law and hold all the key positions in law enforcement and the making of laws.  At that time, Illinois became an outlaw state and for all practical purposes, they seceded from the United States of America.
VII.    The BAR ASSOCIATION then sent organizers to all the other states and explained to the lawyers there how much more profitable and secure it would be for them, as lawyers, to join this union and be protected by its bylaws and cannons.  They issued to the lawyers in each state a charter from the Illinois organization.  California joined in 1927 and a few reluctant states and their lawyers waited until the 1930's to join when the treasonous act became DE FACTO and the Citizen's became captives.  Under this system, the lawyers could guarantee prejudged decisions for the privileged class against the lower class.  This was all made possible by the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION to favor the right and have unlawfully substituted them in place of Constitutional Laws.        What is the real difference between the dreaded "Klansman" in white robes and fiery crosses and the ABA "Klansmen" in the BLACK ROBES sitting on the bench?  Aren't they as dictatorial as the KGB and the GESTAPO are accused of being?  This has fulfilled Orwell's prediction for 1984 and made it a fact, THE BLACK ROBE CULT.        Various groups that have been lawfully stoned walled by the ABA and the courts suggest we join hands and file an initiative to abolish the Bar Association as there are 17 states where Citizens have the Right to do this by the voting process.  If we can do this it will destroy, the power of the Bar in America with similar method they used to gain their power, state by state.  Any Citizens who live in one of these 17 states, can do this, and if not in one of these states you can contribute to other states that can.        Who is going to run the Courts and practice law if we outlaw the BAR?  The CONSTITUTIONAL COMMON LAW COURTS and COMMON LAW non-Union COUNSELORS.  I would like to remind you that the Constitution was written in plain English and the Statutes passed by Congress were also in plain English, with the intent of Congress how each law should be used and not the opinions of various Judges as the codes list.        Any normal person can read the Constitution and Statutes and understand them without any trouble.  The public in California was shocked to learn that the State Government has no control or jurisdiction over the Bar Association or its members.  The state does not accredit the law schools or hold Bar examinations.        They do not issue state licenses to LAWYERS.  The Bar Association accredits all the law schools, holds their private examinations and selects the students they will accept in their organization and issues them so-called license but keeps the fees for themselves.        The Bar is the only one that can punish or disbar a Lawyer.  They also select the lawyers that they consider qualified for Judgeships and various other offices in the State.        Only the Bar Association or their designated committees can remove any of these lawyers from public office.  The State Legislature will not change this system as they are also a designated committee of the Bar.        On August 21, 1984, Rose Bird, Chief Justice of the California State Supreme Court, another of the Bar Associations Judicial Committee's, stated in essence that the Bar should determine the legality of all initiatives before they were allowed to go on the ballot.  This is contrary to both State and Federal Constitutions, as well as the Laws of this Nation instituted By and For the People as a Sovereign UNITY of Independent States of We The People, not a fraudulent Corporate entity of Lawyers.        This is a tremendous amount of power for a PRIVATE union that is incorporated and headquartered in Illinois to hold over the Citizens of California or any other state.        The only recourse is through this initiative process and vote by the people.  After the Founding Fathers had formed the Constitution, outlining the laws as to the way our government was to be run, Thomas Jefferson said, in essence, "This proves that plain people, if given the chance, can enact laws and run a government as well as or better than royalty and the blue bloods of Europe."        The American people must stop thinking that lawyers are better than they are and can do a better job than they can before the courts of America.  Under the Common Law and the Laws of America, no where is it expressly given for anyone to have the power or the right to form a Corporation.        Corporations are given birth because of ignorance on the part of the American people and are operating under implied consent and power which they have usurped and otherwise stolen from the people.  By RIGHT AND LAW THEY HAVE NO POWER, AUTHORITY OR JURISDICTION, and must be put out of business by the good Citizens of America in their fight for FREEDOM.        We cannot hope to reclaim our Country if we continue to let that beast stay in our bed and in our homes.  It is imperative that we remove this demon from its throne and put OUR CONSTITUTIONAL COMMON LAW COURTS and JUSTICE SYSTEM, back into effect.  We must stop worrying about what someone else will think, this is our country and we have foreign entities attempting to take control of us and our Nation.        These children of Satan have nothing good in store for any of us, and those who are ignorant enough to believe their lies, deceit, and conspiracy, deserve just what they receive because they ask for it.
IX.    MOST LAWYERS are OUR ENEMY:         The small handful that are good must get on the right side and help us win our war, or they are not on our side.  There can be no more sitting on the fence, people must decide which side they are on and fight.        Lawyers that claim to be on our side and are later found out to be traitors, must be put to death as this is just what they have planned for all Americans, who do not abide by their rules and regulations.  Americans cannot win the war if they allow traitors to infiltrate our tanks and get away with it.  The enemy Americans are fighting is a deadly enemy, that care nothing for anyone out of their own ranks, and if you turn your back on them, you could be their next victim.
X.    "TREASON"        LAWYER AND LAWYER-JUDGE COURTS ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL:        Since the BIGGEST CRIMES in the world are committed in the courtrooms by lawyers and lawyer-judges AGAINST the people, as the lawyers and their bar associations, which are affiliated with each other INTERNATIONALLY, have joined in the INTERNATIONAL CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE PEOPLE of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA to DESTROY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FROM WITHIN (TREASON).        They have already taken over the courts and the government, and ALL political parties, where they all take orders from ONE FRONT OFFICE, the offices of the internationally affiliated bar associations, make a ONE PARTY "SYSTEM," the BAR ASSOCIATION PARTY.        This necessitated and URGENT need to form a 2nd political party, the ANTI LAWYER PARTY, where all lawyers and those who attended law school are barred from this 2nd party (ALP)..  All the states have unconstitutional aristocratic courts, as their constitutions and/or unconstitutional "lawyer systems" require judges to be lawyers, creating a RULING CLASS, which is FORBIDDEN by Article IV, Section 4, of the U.S. Constitution, the 13th Amendment and Article I, Section 26 of the Texas Constitution.
XI.    The U.S. Constitution GUARANTEES to every state in this union a REPUBLICAN FORM of government.  Any other form of government is FORBIDDEN.  No public officer or branch of government can be limited to a RULING CLASS of any kind, or the states become ARISTOCRACIES and NOT republics.  Also, the lawyers have made themselves 1st Class Citizens, where many public offices and branches of government are open to lawyers only.        All other people are limited to only two branches of government and to only certain offices in those two branches of government, making all people who are non-lawyers into 2nd class subject citizens.        When the courts belong to the people, as the United States Constitution REQUIRES, (Article IV, Section 4, we the people, will NEVER rule against themselves.        In these Unconstitutional courts foreign tribunals (hoodlum centers), "men" in black dresses, that are Unconstitutional ROBES OF NOBILITY. (Article 1, Section 9 and 10) with a lot of hanky panky and hocus pocus, dispense a perverted IDIOTology, where the people are terrorized by members of the BLACK ROBE CULT (lawyers and lawyer judges in the courtrooms.        The legislative branch of government does NOT have the Constitutional Power to issue Court Orders or any other kind of Orders.        ONLY presidents and governors have the Constitutional Power to grant PARDONS, but lawyers and lawyer-judges are unconstitutionally granting PARDONS with "immunity from prosecution."        Citizens are not permitted to act like people in the courts.  The Citizen (2nd class) is told that he does not know how to fill out fancy lawyer forms; that he is not trained in the law; that he does not know court rules and procedures; etc.        This is Unconstitutional "lawyer system," only HEARSAY SUBSTITUTES (lawyers) NOT under oath, have access to the courts, even though ONLY sworn testimony and evidence can be presented in court.  Anything else is Bill of Attainder, NOT permitted under the U.S. Constitution (Article 1, Sections 9 and 10).        The U.S. Constitution does NOT give anyone the right to a lawyer or the right to counsel, or the right to any other HEARSAY SUBSTITUTE.  The 6th Amendment is very SPECIFIC, that the accused ONLY has the right to the ASSISTANCE of counsel and this ASSISTANCE of counsel CAN BE ANYONE THE ACCUSED CHOOSES WITHOUT LIMITATION.
XII.    LAWYERS and LAWYER-JUDGES:         Created Unconstitutional "lawyer system" pre-trial "motions" and "Hearings" to have eternal EXTORTIONISTIC litigations, which is BARRATRY and also is in violation of the U.S. Constitution, and Article 1, Section 14 of the Texas Constitution as this places defendants in DOUBLE JEOPARDY a hundred times over.  Defendants only have a right to A TRIAL, NOT TRIALS.        When a criminal is freed on a TECHNICALITY, HE IS FREED BECAUSE OF A FIX and a PAY-OFF, as a defendant can only be freed if found innocent BY A JURY NOT BY ANY "TECHNICALITY."        Whenever a lawyer is involved in a case directly or indirectly, as a litigant or assisting in counsel, ALL LAWYER-JUDGES HAVE TO DISQUALIFY THEMSELVES, AS THERE CANNOT BE A CONSTITUTIONAL TRIAL and also there would be a violation of the conflict of interest laws, along with the violation of separation of powers and checks and balances, because "OFFICERS" OF THE COURT ARE ON BOTH SIDES OF THE BENCH.        These same LAWYER-JUDGES are awarding or approving LAWYER FEES, directly and indirectly, amounting to BILLIONS OF DOLLARS annually, all in violation of conflict of interest laws. Since crime and treason are against the law, and the lawyer profession is a crooked profession, a LEGAL BOUNTY should be placed on ALL LAWYERS (betrayers) and all those who are aiding and abetting these TRAITORS, the lawyers. As long as there are lawyers, there will never be any law, constitution or justice.  There will only be MOB RULE, RULE BY A MOB OF LAWYERS (TRAITORS).
IXV.    CASE "LAW" IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL:        As CASE "LAW" IS ENACTED BY THE JUDICIAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT.        When a lawyer-judge instructs, directs, or gives orders to a jury, the lawyer-judge is TAMPERING WITH THE JURY.  He also tampers with testimony when he orders the answers to be either "yes" or "No."  The lawyer --judge also tampers, fixes, and rigs the trial when he orders anything stricken from the record, or when he "rules" certain evidence and the truth to be inadmissable.  This makes the trial and transcript FIXED and RIGGED, because the jury does not hear the REAL TRUTH and ALL THE FACTS.  Juries are made into puppets by the lawyers and lawyer-judges.        All lawyers are automatically in the judicial branch of government, as they have the Unconstitutional TITLE OF NOBILITY (Article 1, Section 9 and 10), "Officer of the court."        Citizens have to be elected or hired to be in any branch of government but non-lawyer Citizens are limited to only 2 of the 3 branches of government.  Lawyers as 1st class citizens, can be hired or elected to any of the three branches of government.  Lawyers, "Officers of the Court," in the Judicial Branch, are Unconstitutionally in 2 branches of government AT THE SAME TIME whenever they are hired or elected to the executive or legislative branches.  This is a violation of the separation of powers, checks and balances, and the conflict of interest laws.        District attorneys and State's attorneys have taken over the Grand Juries FROM the people, where the people are DENIED ACCESS to the grand juries when they attempt to present evidence of crimes committed in the courtrooms by the lawyers and lawyer-judges.  TRY TAKING THIS MATERIAL TO THE GRAND JURIES!        The U.S. Constitution, being the Supreme Fundamental Law, is not and CANNOT be ambiguous as to be interpreted, or it would be a worthless piece of paper and we would have millions of interpretations (Unconstitutional amendments) instead of the few we have now.  That is why all judges and public servants are SWORN TO SUPPORT the U.S. Constitution, NOT interpret it.        Imagine hypothetically how stupid it would be if any constitution stated, "that the judicial branch of government has the power to interpret this constitution."        ORGANIZED CRIME never existed until the BAR ASSOCIATION took over OUR COURTS and OUR GOVERNMENT.  Now crime is organized internationally, just as the Bar Associations are organized.  Some of their international affiliations include but are not limited to THE INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSOCIATIONINTERNATIONAL TRIAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATIONWORLD PEACE THROUGH LAW CENTERWORLD ASSEMBLY OF JUDGES: et al.  This means that the Bar Associations are not only the INTERNATIONAL CRIME SYNDICATE, but also the INTERNATIONAL WORLD GOVERNMENT and INTERNATIONAL COMMUNIST PARTY.
XV.    Under INTERNATIONAL ORDERS:        ALL LAWYERS, whether they left law school yesterday or 50 years ago, are EXACTLY THE SAME.  All lawyers have to file the same motions and follow the same procedures in using the same Unconstitutional "lawyer system" of hanky panky and hocus pocus, and to DESTROY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FROM WITHIN by always ruling AGAINST THE PEOPLE.  ALL LAWYERS AND LAWYER JUDGES ARE GUILTY OF "TREASON."        In probate, the lawyers place themselves in everyone's will and estate.   When there are minor children as heirs, the lawyer-judges appoint a lawyer (a child molesting Fagin) for EACH CHILD and, at times, the lawyer fees EXCEED the total amount of the estate.        An OUTRAGEOUS amount of TAX "MONEY" is directly and indirectly STOLEN BY LAWYERS.  Money that is budgeted to County Boards, School Boards and other local and federal agencies eventually finds its way into the pockets of lawyers, as ALL of these agencies are "TRICKED" and "FORCED" into ETERNAL EXTORTIONISTIC LITIGATION.        In all elections, VOTE AGAINST ALL LAWYERS, never vote for a lawyer.  Vote FOR NON-LAWYERS ONLY.  If only lawyers are running for election to the same office, do NOT vote for any of them, as most are ALL ALIKE.  All lawyers are programmed to be "TRAITORS AND INHUMAN CLONES."
        WALK SOFTLY AMERICANS AND CARRY A BIG STICK        Most importantly don't be afraid to use it.  We are under vicious assault and we must make use of every resource we have, or give into their slavery.  COPY AND SPREAD WIDELY, SEND COPIES TO THE CRIMINAL LAWYERS AND LAWYER-JUDGES.
 II Corinthians 5:5.  For we walk by faith, not by sight.  
Author Unknown

Karmitty's picture

             By Dr. Kevin Barrett
When Gandhi was asked his opinion of Western civilization he said it would be a good idea. But that oft-cited quote, is misleading, assuming as it does that civilization is an unmitigated blessing. 
Civilized people, we are told, live peacefully and cooperatively with their fellows, sharing the necessary labour in order to obtain the leisure to develop arts and sciences. And while that would be a good idea, it is not a good description of what has been going on in the so-called advanced cultures during the past 8,000 years. 
Civilization, as we know it, is largely the creation of psychopaths. All civilizations, our own included, have been based on slavery and "warfare." Incidentally, the latter term is a euphemism for mass murder. 
The prevailing recipe for civilization is simple: 
1) Use lies and brainwashing to create an army of controlled, systematic mass murderers; 
2) Use that army to enslave large numbers of people (i.e. seize control of their labour power and its fruits); 
3) Use that slave labour power to improve the brainwashing process (by using the economic surplus to employ scribes, priests, and PR men). Then go back to step one and repeat the process. 
Psychopaths have played a disproportionate role in the development of civilization, because they are hard-wired to lie, kill, injure, and generally inflict great suffering on other humans without feeling any remorse. The inventor of civilization -- the first tribal chieftain who successfully brainwashed an army of controlled mass murderers -- was almost certainly a genetic psychopath. Since that momentous discovery, psychopaths have enjoyed a significant advantage over non-psychopaths in the struggle for power in civilizational hierarchies -- especially military hierarchies. 
Military institutions are tailor-made for psychopathic killers. The five percent or so of human males who feel no remorse about killing their fellow human beings make the best soldiers. And the 95 percent who are extremely reluctant to kill make terrible soldiers -- unless they are brainwashed with highly sophisticated modern techniques that turn them (temporarily it is hoped) into functional psychopaths. 
In his book, "On Killing" (1996), Lt. Col. Dave Grossman has re-written military history to highlight what other histories hide: The fact that military science is less about strategy and technology than about overcoming the instinctive human reluctance to kill members of our own species. The true "Revolution in Military Affairs" was not Donald Rumsfeld’s move to high-tech in 2001, but Brigadier Gen. S.L.A. Marshall’s discovery in the 1940s that only 15-20 percent of World War II soldiers along the line of fire would use their weapons: "Those (80-85 percent) who did not fire did not run or hide (in many cases they were willing to risk great danger to rescue comrades, get ammunition, or run messages), but they simply would not fire their weapons at the enemy, even when faced with repeated waves of banzai charges" (Grossman, p. 4). 
Marshall’s discovery and subsequent research proved that in all previous wars, a tiny minority of soldiers -- the five percent who are natural-born psychopaths and perhaps a few temporarily-insane imitators -- did almost all the killing. Normal men just went through the motions and, if at all possible, refused to take the life of an enemy soldier, even if that meant giving up their own. The implication: Wars are ritualized mass murders by psychopaths of non-psychopaths (This cannot be good for humanity’s genetic endowment!).
Marshall’s work, brought a Copernican revolution to military science. In the past, everyone believed that the soldier willing to kill for his country was the (heroic) norm, while one who refused to fight was a (cowardly) aberration. The truth, as it turned out, was that the normative soldier hailed from the psychopathic five percent. The sane majority, would rather die than fight. 
The implication, too frightening for even the likes of Marshall and Grossman to fully digest, was that the norms for soldiers’ behaviour in battle had been set by psychopaths. That meant that psychopaths were in control of the military as an institution. Worse, it meant that psychopaths were in control of society’s perception of military affairs. Evidently, psychopaths exercised an enormous amount of power in seemingly sane, normal society. 
How could that be? In "Political Ponerology," Andrzej Lobaczewski explains that clinical psychopaths enjoy advantages even in non-violent competitions to climb the ranks of social hierarchies. Because they can lie without remorse (and without the telltale physiological stress that is measured by lie detector tests) psychopaths can always say whatever is necessary to get what they want. In court, for example, psychopaths can tell extreme bald-faced lies in a plausible manner, while their sane opponents are handicapped by an emotional predisposition to remain within hailing distance of the truth. Too often, the judge or jury imagines that the truth must be somewhere in the middle, and then issues decisions that benefit the psychopath. As with judges and juries, so too with those charged with decisions concerning who to promote and who not to promote in corporate, military and governmental hierarchies. The result is that all hierarchies inevitably become top-heavy with psychopat
So-called conspiracy theorists, some of whom deserve the pejorative connotation of that much-abused term, often imagine that secret societies of Jews, Jesuits, bankers, communists, Bilderbergers, Muslim extremists, papists, and so on, are secretly controlling history, doing dastardly deeds, and/or threatening to take over the world. As a leading "conspiracy theorist" according to Wikipedia, I feel eminently qualified to offer an alternative conspiracy theory which, like the alternative conspiracy theory of 9/11, is both simpler and more accurate than the prevailing wisdom: The only conspiracy that matters is the conspiracy of the psychopaths against the rest of us. 
Behind the apparent insanity of contemporary history, is the actual insanity of psychopaths fighting to preserve their disproportionate power. And as that power grows ever-more-threatened, the psychopaths grow ever-more-desperate. We are witnessing the apotheosis of the overworld -- the criminal syndicate or overlapping set of syndicates that lurks above ordinary society and law just as the underworld lurks below it. In 9/11 and the 9/11 wars, we are seeing the final desperate power-grab or "endgame" (Alex Jones) of brutal, cunning gangs of CIA drug-runners and president-killers; money-laundering international bankers and their hit-men, economic and otherwise; corrupt military contractors and gung-ho generals; corporate predators and their political enablers; brainwashers and mind-rapists euphemistically known as psy-ops experts and PR specialists. In short, the whole sick crew of certifiable psychopaths running our so-called civilization. And they are running scared. It was 
their terror of losing control that they projected onto the rest of us by blowing up the Twin Towers and inciting temporary psychopathic terror-rage in the American public. 
Why does the psychopathocracy fear it is losing control? Because it is threatened by the spread of knowledge. The greatest fear of any psychopath is of being found out. As George H. W. Bush said to journalist Sarah McClendon in December, 1992, "If the people knew what we had done, they would chase us down the street and lynch us." 
Given that Bush is reported to have participated in parties where child prostitutes were sodomized and otherwise abused, among his many other crimes, his statement to McClendon should be taken seriously. 
Psychopaths go through life knowing that they are completely different from other people. They quickly learn to hide their lack of empathy, while carefully studying others’ emotions so as to mimic normalcy while cold-bloodedly manipulating the normals. 
Today, thanks to new information technologies, we are on the brink of unmasking the psychopaths and building a civilization of, by and for the normal human being -- a civilization without war, a civilization based on truth, a civilization in which the saintly few rather than the diabolical few would gravitate to positions of power. We already have the knowledge necessary to diagnose psychopathic personalities and keep them out of power. We have the knowledge necessary to dismantle the institutions in which psychopaths especially flourish -- militaries, intelligence agencies, large corporations and secret societies. We simply need to disseminate this knowledge -- and develop the will to use it -- as widely as possible. 
Above all, we need to inform the public about how psychopaths co-opt and corrupt normal human beings. One way they do this, is by manipulating shame and denial -- emotions foreign to psychopaths but common and easily-induced among normals. 
Consider how gangs and secret societies (psychopaths’ guilds in disguise) recruit new members. Some criminal gangs and satanist covens demand that candidates for admission commit a murder to "earn their stripes."
Skull and Bones, the Yale-based secret society that supplies the CIA with drug-runners, mind-rapists, child abusers and professional killers, requires neophytes to lie naked in a coffin and masturbate in front of older members while reciting the candidate’s entire sexual history. By forcing the neophyte to engage in ritualized behaviour that would be horrendously shameful in normal society, the psychopaths’ guild destroys the candidate’s normal personality, assuming he had one in the first place, and turns the individual into a co-opted, corrupt, degraded shadow of his former self -- a manufactured psychopath or psychopath’s apprentice. 
This manipulation of shame has the added benefit of making psychopathic organizations effectively invisible to normal society. Despite easily available media reports, American voters in 2004 simply refused to see that the two major-party presidential candidates had lain naked in a coffin masturbating in front of older Bonesmen in order to gain admission to Skull and Bones and thus become members of the criminal overworld. 
Likewise, many Americans have long refused to see that hawkish elements of the overworld, operating through the CIA, had obviously been the murderers of JFK, MLK, RFK, JFK Jr., Malcolm X, ChÈ, AllendÈ, Wellstone, Lumumba, Aguilera, Diem, and countless other relatively non-psychopathic leaders. They refuse to see the continuing murders of millions of people around the world in what amounts to an American holocaust. They refuse to see the evidence that the psychopaths’ guilds running America’s most powerful institutions use the most horrific forms of sexualized abuse imaginable to induce multiple-personality-disorder in child victims, then use the resulting mind-control slaves as disposable drug-runners, prostitutes, Manchurian candidates and even diplomatic envoys. And of course they refuse to see that 9/11 was a transparently obvious inside job, and that their own psychopath-dominated military-intelligence apparatus is behind almost every major terrori
st outrage of recent decades. 
All of this psychopathic behaviour at the top of the social hierarchy is simply too shameful for ordinary people to see, so they avert their gaze, just as wives of husbands who are sexually abusing their children sometimes refuse to see what is happening in plain view. If deep, deep denial were a river in Egypt, American citizens’ willful blindness would be more like the Marianas Trench. 
But thanks to the power of the Internet, people everywhere are waking up. The only obvious non-psychopath among Republican presidential candidates, Ron Paul, also happens to be the only candidate in either party with significant grassroots support. 
If "love" is embedded in the Revolution Ron Paul heralds, that is because Dr. Paul -- a kindly, soft-spoken physician who has delivered more than 4,000 babies -- implicitly recognizes that government is the invention and tool of psychopaths, and therefore must be strictly limited in scope and subjected to a rigorous system of checks and balances, lest the psychopath’s tools, fear and hatred, replace love as the glue that binds society together. 
The decline in militarism since World War II in advanced countries, the spread of literacy and communications technology, and the people’s growing demands for a better life, together represent a gathering force that terrifies the psychopathocracy, (those alternately competing-then-cooperating gangs of psychopaths who have ruled through lies, fear and intimidation since the dawn of so-called civilization). 
Since nuclear weapons have made war obsolete, the pathocracy is terrified that its favourite social control mechanism -- ritualized mass slaughter -- is increasingly unavailable. And if war was the great human tragedy, the pathocrats’ pathetic attempt at a war-substitute -- the transparently phoney "war on terror" -- is repeating it as sheerest farce. 
Truly, we are witnessing the twilight of the psychopaths. Whether in their death throes they succeed in pulling down the curtain of eternal night on all of us, or whether we resist them and survive to see the dawn of a civilization worthy of the name, is the great decision in which all of us others, however humbly, are now participating. 
About the writer: Dr. Kevin Barrett, co-founder of the Muslim-Christian-Jewish Alliance for 9/11 Truth, has taught English, French, Arabic, American Civilization, Humanities, African Literature, Folklore, and Islam at colleges and universities in the San Francisco Bay area, Paris, and Madison, Wisconsin. Barrett became a 9/11 truth activist in 2004 after reading David Griffin’s The New Pearl Harbor and conducting follow-up research that convinced him Griffin had accurately summarized evidence indicating 9/11 was an inside job. 
In the summer of 2006, Republican state legislators and Fox newscasters demanded that Barrett be fired from his job teaching an introductory Islam class at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, but the University refused to buckle, and Barrett got high marks from his students. He has appeared in several documentary films, lectures widely on 9/11 and hosts three radio programs on three different patriot networks.

RightToTravel's picture

The Reason It's Lawless, Is Because Each Court / Judge Serves the Crown (Sovereign), and Each US State Has Declaired It'self Sovereign. The Judge and Jury Serve the Crown. The Jury Is Made Up Of The Peerage Of Those Royal To The Crown. The Attorney / Lawyer's First Duty Is To The Court, and The Court Serves The Crown. (New Full Video)

chuck blu's picture

Is there any grand jury established in Ohio?
Is there any jury pull setup in Ohio?
Are their any men/women wanting to.fulfill that?
E mail me at

mkphillips's picture

I just Give Up!

Fourth Branch's picture

On February 23rd Connecticut Governor Danell P. Malloy stated on Tucker Carlson's show he will not comply with the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) by allowing illegal aliens to remain in Connecticut.
Article VI Clause II states the Constitution and all Laws made in pursuance thereof shall be the Supreme Law of the land;
Article VI Clause III states all Executive and Judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States , shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support the Constitution;

Article I Section VIII Clause IV states Congress shall have the Power to establish a uniform rule of naturalization;
Article I Section VIII Clause XVIII states Congress shall have the Power to make all Laws necessary and Proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers ,and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department of Officer thereof;
Congress created the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) in pursuance of Article I Section VIII Clause IV, Article I Section VIII Clause XVIII and Article VI Clause II;
Section 274. [8 U.S.C. 1324] of the INA BRINGING IN AND HARBORING CERTAIN ALIENS, being the Supreme Law of the Land for Immigration, requires the arrest and imprisonment of anyone who aids and abets illegal aliens;
Malloy knowingly and willingly violated all of the above Provisions and in doing so must be arrested. It is time for We the People to contact the Department of Justice and demand Malloy's arrest.
There is a link to a Petition for this purpose
Please make your voice be heard by signing the Petition at and spread the word by forwarding this message!

jf6363's picture

Don't forget Mr Cuomo.As he has stated the same.

GERARD53's picture

In our system, law enforcement is an executive power. The FBI is thus an executive branch agency. Indeed, far from independent, it is a part of the Justice Department; the FBI director is subordinate to the attorney general in the chain-of-command.

Under the Constitution, all executive power is endowed in one official, the president of the United States. Every official who wields power in the executive branch thus wields it at the pleasure of the chief executive. The president may terminate any executive officer, even those who have been confirmed by Congress, for any reason or no reason. The FBI director is no different.

It is true that Congress has given the FBI director a ten-year term, but it is best thought of as a presumptive ten-year limit. There are two explanations for it.The first is J.Edgar Hoover. After his legendary (and notorious) 43-year tenure, Congress and the Ford White House decided that such awesome power should not be in a single set of hands for so long. In 1976, a law was enacted limiting the director’s term to ten years.

Why ten years? That brings us to the second explanation: the aspiration that law-enforcement should be apolitical and non-partisan. By settling on a ten-year limit, two years longer than any president may serve, lawmakers signaled a preference for the FBI director to be retained, even when presidential administrations change, regardless of party.

Understand, though: This is a preference, it is not binding on the president. Presumptively, after being confirmed, the FBI director is retained by subsequent presidents. If the president decides to make a change, however, the president is constitutionally authorized to remove the director and does not need cause – at least not legally (political need is always a different calculation).

Since Congress imposed the ten-year limitation, one FBI director has been removed: Director William Sessions was fired by President Clinton in 1993 after he refused to resign. It turns out, moreover, that the limit is not much of a limit: In 2011, when President Obama wanted to keep Director Robert Mueller for an extra two years, Congress accommodated him by enacting legislation extending the term. It was when Mueller’s term ended that Director James Comey was appointed in 2013.

Presumptively, Director Comey would serve until September 4, 2023. But that is only if the current president and any future president between now and then chooses to retain him.


Flicka's picture

I would like to know as well. can't find it