NLA NEWS IN THE COURTS

Certified Letter to Daniel Sutton.pdf

For the Latest on the Unified Common Law Grand Jury court filings click here

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQBCCp4uGG8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1R2yuemfCbk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRMgeOVhs2s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Y-BayI8C9E

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qW8fYiy0yIA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ucL1Ulw6B3c

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9yTWtm-mUJE&feature=em-share_video_user

Published on Jan 27, 2016

Published on Jan 6, 2016

Published on Jan 6, 2016

It is “TIME” to hold all judges accountable we are “NOW” venturing into a massive campaign to expose the out of control judicial corruption (RICO) across America. We will be serving “every” federal judge and filing in all 94 Federal District Courts across America simultaneously. NOW IS THE TIME to pay attention and become active. YOUR PARTICIPATION IS NEEDED, it’s your duty!

..."The words 'district court of the United States' commonly describe constitutional courts created under Article III of the Constitution, not the legislative courts which have long been the courts of the Territories." [Mookini v. U.S., 303 U.S. 201, 205, 58 S.Ct. 543, 545, 82 L.Ed. 748. (See also Longshoremen v. Juneau Spruce Corp., 324 U.S. 237; Reynolds v. U.S., 98 U.S. 145, 154; McAlister v. U.S., 141 U.S. 174; U.S. v. Burroughs, 289 U.S. 159, 163]

28 U.S. Code § 132 - Creation and composition of district courts (a) There shall be in each judicial district a district court which shall be a court of record known as the United States District Court for the district.

A COURT OF RECORD. "A judicial tribunal  having attributes and exercising functions independently of the person of the magistrate designated generally to hold it ... proceeding according to the course of common law". [Jones v. Jones, 188 Mo.App. 220, 175 S.W. 227, 229; Ex parte Gladhill, 8 Metc. Mass., 171, per Shaw, C.J. See, also, Ledwith v. Rosalsky, 244 N.Y. 406, 155 N.E. 688, 689][Black's Law Dictionary, 4th Ed., 425, 426]

The decisions of a superior court may only be challenged in a court of appeal. The decisions of an inferior court are subject to collateral attack. In other words, in a superior court one may sue an inferior court directly, rather than resort to appeal to an appellate court. Decision of a court of record may not be appealed. It is binding on ALL other courts. However, no statutory or constitutional court (whether it be an appellate or supreme court) can second guess the judgment of a court of record. “The judgment of a court of record whose jurisdiction is final, is as conclusive on all the world as the judgment of this court would be. It is as conclusive on this court as it is on other courts. It puts an end to inquiry concerning the fact, by deciding it." [Ex parte Watkins, 3 Pet., at 202-203. [cited by SCHNECKLOTH v. BUSTAMONTE, 412 U.S. 218, 255 (1973)].

Memos to Sheriff

• 15-09-07 Open Letter to the Sheriff
• Memo 001-Due Process
• Memo 002-Common Law
• Memo 003-Chief Law Enforcer
• Memo 004-Soverign
• Memo 005 Summary Proceedings
• Power and Authority of The County Sheriff

More powerful documents

• Bill of Rights
• Confirmatio Cartarum
• Declaration of Independence
• Form 4490
• Form 56
• MIRANDA v. ARIZONA
• Marbury v Madison
• Spontaneous Order
• U.S. v. Mersky
• US Constitution
• US v Williams

LEGAL DOCUMENTS

The following papers define important legal terms and positions that We the People should have knowledge of and can assist you in court. If you are going to file a case you should take our free civics course above.

PDF

• Administrators Vow
• COMMON LAW IS STILL LAW
• Court of Law
• Court of record example
• Courts that Resists the Constitution
• DE FACTO -v- DE JURE
• Extraordinary Remedies
• Judicial Immunity
• Jurisprudence
• Magna Carta
• Memorandum Authorities
• National Liberty Alliance Organization
• Prima facie case
• Principals of Law and the Kings Bench
• Requisite to justice essay
• Right to Practice Law
• Rights
• Summary proceedings null and void
• Title 26 is not law
• U.S. v. Mersky
• US district Courts are Article III courts
• Writ of error1

WORD

• COMMON LAW IS STILL LAW
• Court of Law
• Court of record example
• Courts that Resists the Constitution
• DE FACTO -v- DE JURE
• Extraordinary Remedies
• Judicial Immunity
• Jurisprudence
• Magna Carta
• Memorandum Authorities
• National Liberty Alliance Organization
• Prima facie case
• Principals of Law and the Kings Bench
• Requisite to justice essay
• Right to Practice Law
• Rights
• Summary proceedings null and void
• Title 26 is not law
• U.S. v. Mersky
• US district Courts are Article III courts
• Writ of error.docx2

I would like to suggest seven books that have greatly helped me in my understanding of the law and its history and who our founding fathers really were. Ultimately the war of darkness against light as Benjamin Franklyn said "We the People will be ruled by God or Tyrants," there are no other choices.   

• The Making of America by Cleon Skousen – buy here www.nccs.net
• 5000 Year Leap – free here > http://nationallibertyalliance.org/5000-year-leap
• Common Law Brett Winters – google to find
• Trial by Jury by Lysander Spooner - free here > http://nationallibertyalliance.org/trial-jury
• The Real Thomas Jefferson by Andrew M. Allison - buy here > www.nccs.net
• The Real George Washington by Jay A. Parry and Andrew M. Allison - buy here > www.nccs.net
• The Real Bengamin Franklin by Andrew M. Allison - buy here > www.nccs.net

More filings ...

Please support our endeavor, help keep NLA on the web,
Donate $5.00 or more a month, and become a Premier Member, Thank you.

Notice: Anyone posting to this forum be advised that this is reserved for discussion on our paperwork and filings. ANY unrelated posts will be deleted and repeat offenders will be blocked from posting anywhere on this site.

The comment area below is for on point “discussion”, any off point conversation will be deleted and abusive members will be blocked.