Constitution Class

CONSTITUTION CLASS

Libertarian, Michael Badnarik teaches a class on the Constitution. If you like Ron Paul and follow his message of freedom, this is a MUST WATCH!!! Most of what you think you know about the United States is wrong. Think you own your Car? Think its your money? Why do we have to register your car and get plates? Think you own Your property? He explains the differences between rights and privileges.

You can visit Michael's website and arrange a live class in your area here > http://www.constitutionpreservation.org/


Carl Miller


AMERICANISM


INDIVIDUALISM -VS- COLLECTIVISM

Please support our endeavor, help keep NLA on the web,
Donate $5.00 or more a month, and become a Premier Member, Thank you.

Comments

Fourth Branch's picture

President Trump's Executive Order regarding Immigration is premised on the Immigration and Nationality Act(INA). He is enforcing the Law.  Last week a three Judge Panel ruled against President Trump enforcing the Law and in doing so attempted to block enforcing the law. Their decision was politically motivated, not based on the Law and as such the decision itself is unconstitutional and illegal.
 
Article VI II states the U.S. Constitution, and all Laws made in pursuance thereof shall be the supreme Law of the land. Clause III requires Officials in both of the United States and of the several States shall be bound by oath or affirmation to support this Constitution.
 
Article I Section VIII Clause IV delegates to Congress the power to establish a uniform rule of naturalization. Clause XVIII delegates to Congress the power to make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing enumerated Poweers and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.
 
The INA is premised on Article VI Clause II and Article I Section VIII Cause XVIII. Congress, thorugh the INA, vested the power to enforce the INA with the Executive branch. thereofer Preisdent Trump was not violating any laws.
 
The Judges by their actions did violate all the above mentioned provisions. Consequenlty they acted in bad behavior with their ruling. They are subject to removal from the Bench through impeachment. Article I Section III Clause I gives the House of Representatives the Power to initiate Impeachment proceedings and as stated by Alexander Hamilton in Federalist Paper #66.
 
Amendment I in the Bill of Rights gives the People the unalienable right to petition the Government for a redress of Grievances There is a petition being circulated for such a purpose in lieu of the above mentioned facts. Exercise your unlaienable Right and let your voice be heard by clicking on the link below to sign a Petition calling for the House of Representatives to initiate Impeachment proceedings against the three Judges on the 9th Circuit who made the unconstitutional ruling.
https://www.change.org/p/tell-u-s-house-of-representatives-impeach-9th-u...

officerkirkland's picture

https://www.facebook.com/Constituional/posts/257087951413771
PRESS RELEASE KrisAnne Hall Joins with C­SPAN to Educate Americans on their Rights  C-SPAN2 to broadcast Constitutional Educator KrisAnne Hall’s class on The Duty of Each State:  Functioning as a Constitutional Republic.  Wellborn, Florida, February 15 . 2017: th Constitutional Education & Consulting announced today that CSPAN2 will broadcast, on three separate days, Constitutional Educator, KrisAnne Hall’s class titled: The Duty Of Each State:  Operating as a Constitutional Republic. When describing her class, KrisAnne Hall said; “Americans have many questions about the limits of federal power and the role the States take in checking the federal government."
Ms. Hall went on to say; “This class will answer these questions, not by opinion, not by interpretation, but by fact, history, and the words of those whose designed our Constitutional Republic. Those who have attend this class leave educated, motivated, and empowered to make the real changes necessary to ensure government is operating within its few and defined delegated powers."
When asked about who this class is for Ms. Hall said; “This is a class for Republicans and Democrats alike:  constitutional truths have no relevance to party affiliation.  It’s not a class that is shrouded in legal jargon. It is not written just for attorneys. It is given in plain everyday English so that anyone, no matter who they are, can understand and apply these essential truths.  This is an education that should be taught in our public schools. C-SPAN2 will broadcast this 75 minute class on 
• February 19th 7:00pm EST • February 20th 11:00am EST   About KrisAnne Hall and Liberty First  KrisAnne Hall is a disabled Army veteran, a Russian linguist, a mother and pastor’s wife. She’s also an attorney a former prosecutor and was fired for teaching the Constitution o her own time and now travels the country 265 days a y ear teaching the Constitution and the history that gave us our founding documents.
 
For more information about KrisAnne Hall or about the C-SPACN event contact KrisAnne at her website at n http://krisannehall.com, email at info@krisannehall.com, or Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/krisanne.hall/
 
Sent to Duane Kirklands desk.........

officerkirkland's picture

https://www.facebook.com/Constituional/posts/251471698642063
Kirkland discovery.........................notes........  judge that looses all authorty................... He lost all authority and all his orders are void, because he went against the article 6 paragraph 2. and obstructing the law he is to preserve and protect by the latter.
 
Trumps authority under eneumerated powers is bound, no judge or lawyer has no justification of obstruting the lattrer, the law. 
Trump has all authority under the delegated powers of the separations powers granted by the enumerated law for a president to enforce. he the corrupt judge has been exposed and he is the Trojan horse within, and only part of the Trojan horse.
The judge s illegal order has no authority and is violating the whole purpose of his delegated powers, with in violation is now not bound to anyone nor any administration. or office of goverment. that's the facts..........
......... judge will be excused and replaced by a Constitutional officer. that follows the true intent of the Constitution.1.
 this judge is a idiot, however trump has the Authority under the enumerated laws. under the Constitution. example....... 1. https://youtu.be/oT9G4hSswD8 How Federal Judges have Perverted the 14th Amendment.5. Activist federal judges have committed grievous offenses against the U.S. Constitution with their perversions of the 14th Amendment:2. a) They have evaded the constitutional limits on their power to hear cases by fabricating individual “constitutional rights” from the 14th Amendment so that they can then pretend that the cases “arise under the Constitution”, thereby claiming “federal question” jurisdiction!Thus, in Roe v. Wade (1973), seven judges on the supreme Court said a“…right of privacy…founded in the Fourteenth Amendment’s concept of personal liberty and restrictions upon state action…” (p. 153)3. makes unconstitutional a State Law making abortion a criminal offense! Those seven judges just made up a “constitutional privacy right” which they said was in the 14th Amendment and which they said prohibits States from outlawing abortion!
4. In Lawrence v. Texas (2003), six judges on the supreme Court said a Texas Law criminalizing homosexual contact was unconstitutional because it violated practitioners’“…right to liberty under the Due Process Clause (p.578)…of the Fourteenth Amendment” (pp. 564, 579).
5. Those six judges just made up a “constitutional liberty right” to have homosexual contact!In Perry v. Schwarzenegger, Judge Walker asserted that “Gender no longer forms an essential part of marriage” (Opinion p.113); and determined that the “due process” clause of the 14th Amendment contains a “fundamental right” to marry persons of the same sex (p.114, etc)!He just made up a 14th Amendment “due process right” to marry persons of the same sex!But abortion, homosexual contact, & marriage are not provisions expressly contained in the U.S. Constitution. So the federal courts have no “federal question” [or “status of the parties” or “diversity”] jurisdiction to hear these cases!6. b) They have evaded the constitutional limits on their powers by redefining 5 the “due process” clause of the 14th Amendment from its original meaning of ensuring that freed slaves got fair trials before they could be deprived of life, liberty or property, to seizing power to nullify State Laws they don’t like, and Amendments to State Constitutions they don’t like!7. Thus, the supreme Court in Roe v. Wade and Lawrence v. Texas used the “due process” clause to seize power to overturn State Laws criminalizing abortion and homosexual contact; and Judge Walker used the “due process” clause to overturn the Will of the People of the State of California restricting marriage to one man and one woman.8. Again, the “due process” clause refers only to judicial proceedings: That freed slaves couldn’t be lynched, deprived of their freedom, or have their property taken away except pursuant to the judgment of their peers after a fair trial. 9. “Due process” never involved judicial power to override Acts of the Legislature of a Sovereign State or Amendments to State Constitutions. The sole purpose of the “due process” clause was to ensure that freed slaves got FAIR TRIALS!10. c) They have evaded the constitutional limits on their powers by redefining the “equal protection” clause of the 14th Amendment from its original meaning of requiring States to secure to blacks the same right to contract, to hold property, and to sue, as whites enjoyed, and the equal benefit of all laws for security of person and property; to prohibiting the States from making any “distinctions” 11. or “classifications” in their State Statutes or Constitutions the federal judges don’t like!Thus, in Perry v. Schwarzenegger, Judge Walker asserted that Proposition 8 violates the “equal protection” clause of the 14th Amendment because it “disadvantages gays and lesbians without any rational justification” (Opinion p. 135).12. 6. So! Activist federal judges have been using the “due process” clause of the 14th Amendment to override acts of State Legislatures which outlaw conduct federal judges want to legalize! They simply make up a “constitutional right” to do those things.
 
13.  Under their view, there is no limit to their powers! State Legislatures criminalize child rape, but 5 judges on the supreme Court can fabricate a “constitutional right” to have sex with children – a “liberty and privacy right” in the 14th Amendment to have sex with children! If these “liberty and privacy rights” mean that women can abort babies, and homosexual contact is lawful; why can’t they also mean that adults can have sex with children?
14.  Why can’t they mean that people have “liberty and privacy rights” to commit any crime? What’s the limit? There IS no limit! Justice Anthony Kennedy, who wrote the majority opinion in Lawrence v. Texas, said:“…As the Constitution endures, persons in every generation can invoke its principles in their own search for greater freedom.” (p. 579)15. Kennedy just tossed Art. III, Sec. 2 out the door! He and his ideological allies recognize no limits on their judicial power! Just name an act you want legalized and if 5 of them agree, Voila! A new “liberty” “right”! And a Law made by a State Legislature prohibiting that act bites the dust.
16.  And since supreme Court judges claim the right to “set policy” for all of these United States (and we have let them do it), State laws throughout the land prohibiting that act also bite the dust. And that is how we got a handful of supreme Court judges setting “policy” for everyone in the country.17. 7. Abortion, homosexual contact, marriage, prostitution, child sex, drugs, etc. are issues reserved to the States or The People. The federal government is not granted power in the Constitution over these objects, and they are not prohibited by Art. I, Sec. 10, to the States.

mrbagobeans's picture

of govt. has been breached as well, with the ruling of the judges. If a question of rights violated is brought up, then the people violated makes the ruling, the exception being that the govt asks for a Jury trial.The Jury is the only group that can rule over the sovereign. And that has not happened.

Aresposito49's picture

Finished both courses. Whats next to learn. I want more.

maybelsmom's picture

I am currently involved with the classes and have questions regarding getting involved locally. Can't get any information.
 
 

Aresposito49's picture

join the monday night call in. You can ask questions.
 

maybelsmom's picture

I am currently taking the Constitution Course Chapter 10 but am stuck on questions 3 and 10. I am not able to move forward. It would be nice to be able to discuss this with someone to more clearly address the issue. I am anxious to become involved locally. 
 

Ron Flick's picture

I called you on the number you are listed with, but was unable to reach you or leave a message. Please email me when it is a good time to reach you?

We too are anxious for your involvement, and appreciate your efforts to educate yourself and your support for NLA. Welcome to NLA.

Ron Flick - Welcome Com. Director

ron@nationallibertyalliance.org 

maybelsmom's picture

Michael Badnarik discussed in one of his talks about the stripes on the neck tie and how that had a specific meaning in the courtroom. I can't find that info now and wonder if anyone remembers where I can find that discussion or what they remember about it. 

earthgeek's picture

http://usuncut.com/news/united-nations-just-made-major-announcement-dako...

NEWS
The United Nations just made a major announcement on the Dakota Access Pipeline
 | October 28, 2016

71435
SHARES
FacebookTwitter

 

North Dakota is moving forward with construction of its DAPL pipeline despite a representative from the United Nations explicitly calling on the United States to halt it.
Victoria Tauli-Corpus, the UN Special Rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples, issued a press release last September that was officially issued by the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) in defense of the Sioux Tribe and its allies:

“The tribe was denied access to information and excluded from consultations at the planning stage of the project and environmental assessments failed to disclose the presence and proximity of the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation.
“The United States should, in accordance with its commitment to implement the Declaration on the Rights on Indigenous Peoples, consult with the affected communities in good faith and ensure their free, and informed consent prior to the approval of any project affecting their lands, particularly in connection with extractive resource industries.
“I urge the United States Government to undertake a thorough review of its compliance with international standards regarding the obligation to consult with indigenous peoples and obtain their free and informed consent. The statutory framework should be amended to include provisions to that effect and it is important that the US Environmental Protection Agency and the US Advisory Council on Historic Preservation participate in the review of legislation.”

Tauli-Corpus also said the US should defend those protesting the construction of the four-state-long pipeline, saying “The US authorities should fully protect and facilitate the right to freedom of peaceful assembly of indigenous peoples, which plays a key role in empowering their ability to claim other rights.”
Dozens of peaceful protesters were arrested by heavily armed police in riot gear yesterday, with officers deploying potentially ear-damaging sonic cannons in an effort to get the crowds to disperse. In one other instance, improperly licensed mercenaries working for the pipelinedeployed attack dogs on the protesters.
Special Rapporteurs are appointed by the UN Human Rights Council and are tasked to point out human rights concerns as they develop around the world. While these experts are not official UN staff, their work can lead to the UN taking a greater interest in a developing human rights situation.
Nathan Wellman 

Bradley Amendment's picture

Is the CONSTITUTIONAL CLASS on CD?

Bradley Amendment's picture

Are De FACTO Child support Guidelines CONSTITUTIONAL? Are JUDGE acting as DE FACTO PROSECUTORS LEGAL?

gregory's picture

Not trying to be rude but I've seen and read allot of BS. I'd love to donate to the truth but truth has to be felt and without truth you just have another scam.

Sal Narducci's picture

If you realize that you have "seen" and "read" a lot of BS, when do you come to the point where you feel that you NEED to start learning for yourself? Quit looking for someone else to solve your problems, LEARN!  You don't have to believe the truth because it's evident!

gary@NLA's picture

Do you have a point Gregory. Your statement was quite open ended and within a forum not applicable to this conversation string.

kingdolan77's picture

I have certified copies of all 6 of Alabama's constitutions

MTOakey's picture

Incredible course and subject matter !!!
I have scoured the interwebs and have only been able to find two places where one can READ the manuscript Badnarik mentions at 29:50, "U.S.of A. the Republic is the house that no one lives in" because the site he mentions is no longer running. AND the site listed in the "About info" above is also incorrect... it is now www.nationallibertyalliance.org
So, what I have done is recompiled the original document he mentions here, the entire book, and created a .pdf document for download which can be read by all readers and Kindle and can be printed, 2up, both sides = 15 sheets of 8.5x11 folded in half.
Here is my link: http://1drv.ms/UFUqV0
Educate yourself & Enjoy!
NLA may make the document available directly also...

Allan Hampton's picture

Everything mentioned in this article about what government is doing is correct and all of it is either unconstitutional or a usurpation of power.

The federal government cannot amend the Constitution.

The Declaration of Independence has no bearing on, or value to, the Constitution, nor on Rights, nor on Citizen's Duty in Citizenship.

The 14th Amendment is unconstitutional, if not on the words written in the 14th, then on Supreme Court decisions, and federal laws under the 14th.

I didn't see a mention of "Pursuance thereof" of Article VI, Clause 2. Nor did I see mention of Marbury v. Madison; which bears out Pursuance thereof.

Citizen's and the Supreme court do not have the power to legislate.

Citizens only Constitutional input, of force, into the federal government is via the ballot box, to elect, or not reelect Incumbent, Representatives of the House in Congress every two years.

Citizen's have the exclusive Right to use the power of the ballot and jury boxes.

U.S. government usurpation "continues" only with the complicity of the House in Congress, House usurpation (corruption) "continues" only with the complicity of citizen Voters.

All of U.S. citizens Rights did not come from God.

The original Constitution delegated the federal government no power regarding Citizens, Freedom, Rights, and Religion.