Abuse of Power

If you are stuck in an “Abusive Court” and cannot get out we may be able to help. The "Unified United States Common Law Grand Jury" can file an “Amicus Curiae” (Latin for an adviser to the court on some matter of law who is not a party to the case) on your behalf. If the Court fails to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and denial of Due Process we will then join your case to our Federal Case against the Judiciary for dismissal and restitution.

Or are you being Abused by the IRS


READ VERY CAREFULLY
AND FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS BELOW

NLA facilitates the Common Law Grand Jury providing for all necessary costs to operate and educate the People. Education is the key to save our Republic, as Thomas Jefferson said: “If a People expect to be ignorant and free, they expect what never was and never will be.” Therefore we request a donation of $100 or more to cover the cost of joining your case. Please carefully follow the instuructions below.

Anyone requesting assistance must support NLA by donating $5 a month or more. Therefore, you must be a “Premium Member” and be signed up for our "Government by Consent Course." The reason for this is "knowledge is power" and without that power we cannot save our Republic and we will fail.


Notice: To All Who Fill Out An Intake Form

NLA has filed 100’s of writs, mandamuses, decision and orders, petitions and more with federal, county, city, and town courts over the last 6 years. The purpose of the filings is to demand lawful remedy to the Petitioner(s) in each case and to notify the U.S. Supreme Court, the federal district courts, and lower courts  that We the People are paying attention to their actions, that they are in violation of their Oath to “protect the U.S. Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and domestic.” When judges deny We the People due process, they commit treason.


What outcome should you expect when NLA files paperwork on your behalf?

Of course, NLA wants to see immediate compliance with the Law of the Land (U.S. Constitution) and that your issue be resolved quickly and fairly. However, to date the courts continue to ignore NLA’s demands for lawful remedy. As a result, many of the People are unjustly incarcerated, lose their homes, their children, their firearms; the list is long.  

NLA believes justice will be served when the deep state is no longer holding justices, judges, district attorneys, and sheriffs hostage with threats of blackmail or harm to themselves or their family members.

Until this day arrives, practice patience and educate yourself by taking the Government by Consent course. Educate your family, friends, neighbors, and co-workers about the corruption and abuse of power you are battling. Every freedom-loving American needs to be in this battle. 

Keep the Faith. Justice will prevail.

2 Timothy 4:7, Paul writes, "I have fought the good fight, I have finished the race, I have kept the faith."

If you are not part of the Solution, you are part of the problem.

NLA Intake Team



To Sign-up to Join your case to the Grand Jury's case against the Judiciary, on jurisdictional challenges, follow the steps below:

(1) You must be a member, if you are not a member CLICK HERE TO REGISTER, and then return to this page.

(2) Make sure you are logged in, become a Premiere Member by donating $5 a month or more CLICK HERE TO DONATE, and then return to this page.

(3) Make sure you are logged in, CLICK HERE TO SIGN-UP FOR GOVERNMENT BY CONSENT COURSE, and then return to this page. The course is important so that you understand the judicial process and what we are doing.

(4) Attend our Monday night Open Forum every Monday at 9PM EST - Midnight to ask questions and keep informed on our progress. If you cannot join the call downlad the MP3 recording. CLICK HERE FOR INSTRUCTIONS TO JOIN OUR OPEN FORUM, and then return to this page.

(5) Click Here to see Joinder_Time_Chart.pdf for time duration and judicial process.

(6) Make sure you are logged in, CLICK HERE TO FILL OUT THE FORM FOR [Joinder] Mortage/Tax Foreclosures, CPS, APS, Jurisdiction Challenges, IRS, and Habeas Corpus Cases




Comments

officerkirkland@icloud.com's picture

Notice of Treason and Insurrection for the record and the challenging of foreign operations under the color of law title 42 US and titles 18 US 241 242 Case No. ___________________________, Dwane Eugene Kirkland Common Law-Private American Self-Claimed Constitutional Officer-Investigator and Over-watch for public across the United States of America, bound to the oath forever UCC 1-207 1-308, without prejudice Constitutional Continental Congress Senator 11 Bravo Infantry / 1-10 Bill of Rights Advocate MT nation PO BOX 114 London Arkansas 72847 Email: usawritt@protonmail.com Telephone: 406-369-0482 Plaintiff/ claimed beneficiary/UCC 1-2307 1-306/with /*******/**** ________________________________________________________ _______________________________________ _____________________/2020 ________ PM # _____________________________________ {Public Complaint} {Treason and insurrection} **** Defendant’s _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ TO: ______ aka PUBLIC SERVANT Street address____________________ City and state zip_________________ ________________________________ Pursuant to the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America and Connelly vs. General Construction, please be advised that ___________________________, Civilian-Common Law-Private American, UCC 1-207 1-308 without prejudice, all rights reserved none waived, claimed beneficiary, hereby files criminal charges against the following offenders; and we hereby request that you prosecute and impeach the following offenders for treason, sedition, and insurrection: {For the record public over -watch} 2 who are all Defendants in the above-referenced, County Court Case No. ___________________________, for treason, including breach of Constitutional contract, breach of compact agreement between all sister states, which are in harmony with the Constitution of the United States of America, insurrection and rebellion against the Constitution of the United States of America, fraud and misrepresentation, and monopoly. {Threshold Questions for federal article 3 courts} ___________________________, If a Plaintiff requests that a judge answers whether or not it is correct that he and the defendant attorney have taken oaths of office to the Constitution of the United States of America, and the judge both refuses to answer the question and threatens and intimidates the Plaintiff for asking, is this insurrection, sedition, and treason? Is this a breach of the Constitution he swore to protect? Does this disqualify the judge from the case? If a judge suppresses or limits Plaintiff’s right to speak and argue her case/claim, has he committed sedition and insurrection and impeached himself as a valid judge to sit on the bench? Can a judge convert Plaintiff’s right to speak and argue her case/claim into a crime? Is the judge behaving in conflict with the Constitution of the United States of America and the compact agreement between all sister states, which are in harmony with the Constitution of the United States of America? Would this be a breach of oath he is bound to? If the Constitution of the United States of America and the constitution of the state requires the city attorneys to have both an oath of office and a public official bond which binds that oath and if the city attorneys have neither the oath of office nor the public officials bond, is it lawful for the attorneys to represent the city and its defendant employees in a lawsuit or criminal case, including filing documents (pleadings) into the case and speaking for/on behalf of the defendant city and its employees? If a judge or attorney or any delegated power knows that a conflicting law or court order is an unconstitutional act and then continue to enforce it upon on the Plaintiff, is this breach of the oath that they are bound to? If a judge acts like a defendant attorney throughout the whole due process, is this a clear violation of his oath and the Constitution he has to protect? Is the judge the trial of factor? If a judge or attorney or police officer violates Plaintiff’s rights; and Plaintiff writes it to their attention during the process, if they choose to move forward without any written response to the Plaintiff, would this be a breach of the oath and the Constitution they swear to protect and preserve? If Plaintiff brings to the attention of the judge or the attorney a pleading (written document) in support of Plaintiff’s claim/case to a process--and if the judge or the attorney ignores the written document (pleading), would this be a breach of preserving the Constitution of the United States of America and the compact agreement between all sister states, which are in harmony with the Constitution of the United States of America? If a judge or lawyer is shown by written case laws that he or she is in conflict with the Constitution of the United States of America and the compact agreement between all sister states, which are in harmony with the Constitution of the United States of America, would this be a breach of oath they are bound to? ___________________________, The above-said Civilian-Common Law-Private American’s statements, criminal charges, averments, and allegations, against all the Defendants are detailed in the documents enclosed herewith this Notice. We request that you prosecute and impeach from office all Defendants in this matter for said treason, sedition, insurrection, and rebellion, as evidenced in the enclosed documents and throughout the entire proceedings in this matter. {For the record public over -watch} 3 We respectfully and humbly advise that if you condone, aid, and abet the treason committed by the people that the above-said Civilian-Common Law-Private American is complaining against, then you have breached your oath of office, have breached Constitutional contract, and have acted in collusion and conspiracy to commit treason and to perpetuate treason in that court. Accountability You have a duty and obligation to correct the above-said offenders’ treasonous, seditious, rebellious, and insurrection activity in that court, pursuant to your oversight responsibility and your oath of office. Required Corrective Action We humbly request that you remedy the fraud and treason that is active within the court within ten (10) days from the date of this Notice. If you ignore ___________________________,Civilian-Common Law-Private American, UCC 1-207 1-308 without prejudice, all rights reserved non waived, claimed beneficiary’s, complaint and request and are unwilling to get involved, you have aided, abetted, condoned, and acted in collusion and conspiracy to commit treason and to perpetuate treason in that court. Relief We request relief and an award of $2,900,000 be granted to ___________________________,CivilianCommon Law-Private American, UCC 1-207 1-308 without prejudice, all rights reserved non waived, claimed beneficiary, to be provided by all above-listed Defendants/offenders (Defendants/offenders are all listed in the enclosed documents) she is complaining against for all said Defendants’/offenders’ failure to uphold and to protect her constitutional rights and for offender/defendant judges’ and attorneys’ failure to provide for due process of law and for all Defendants’/offenders’ treasonous, insurrection and rebellious, tortious, fraudulent, Constitutional violations and deprivations, and criminal actions and transactions complained of. Jurisdiction Title 5 U. S. C. §§ 556(d), 557, 706. When a court fails to provide due process of law, it forfeits any jurisdiction and any rulings rendered are null and void. Failure to Respond You have a responsibility and duty to respond to ___________________________,Civilian-Common LawPrivate American, UCC 1-207 1-308 without prejudice, all rights reserved non waived, claimed beneficiary, pursuant to minimum to oaths taken and the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America. If you fail to respond, you have acted in dereliction of your duty and have obstructed justice. If you fail to respond and or fail to rebut the charges, then by your failures, you admit to everything contained in this letter, fully binding in any court in America without your protest, or objection, or that of those who represent you. Your failure to respond and/or rebut the charges will comprise your admission and confession to all facts, statements, averments, terms, and provisions contained in this letter and the enclosed supporting documents, and waiver of all rights to raise a controversy, the said admissions, being fully binding in any court in America without protest or objection from you or those who represent you. {For the record public over -watch} 4 By: ___________________________________ ___________________________, Civilian-Common Law-Private American UCC 1-207 1-308 without prejudice All Rights Reserved Non Waived Claimed Beneficiary State of __________) ) ss.: ___________________________, ) Before me, ____________________________, a Notary Public duly authorized by the State of _____________, personally appeared _______________________, who has sworn to and subscribed in my presence, the foregoing instrument, on this _______ day of ______________ in the year _________. ________________________ Constitutional Advocate-Witness: Duane Eugene Kirkland UCC 1-207 1-308 ___________________________, Argument and lawsuit cases: If plaintiff is deprived of their rights in some capacity to which they are entitled. {Owen vs. Independence 100 vol. Supreme court reports. 1398 (1982)- Main vs. Thiboutot 100 vol. Supreme court reports. 2502(1982)-officers have no immunity from liability when violating Constitutional rights. Title 42 US Code Sec. 1983, Sec. 1985, and Sec. 1986 say the plaintiff can sue anyone who violates the Constitutional provisions. Case Bryers vs. United States 273 US Supreme Court rulings 28- Encroachment. Miranda V Arizona 384 US 436-says no rule or law by legislation which would abrogate or abolish any Constitutional right provisions- {All delegated powers}{Under the 10th Amendment of the United States Of America}{Attach all writ of assist- coupon- bill of attainder-direct Tax}{violating Article 1 Sections 9, and 10 US Constitution} { Title 18 , U.S. Code Sec. 2381- if they fail to protect Constitution they are subject to the charge Count 1- felony treason} { Case law Murdock vs. Penn. 319 U.S. 105: (1943)-state may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right by the beneficiary of contract. {Count 2 title 18 US Code Sect 241, 242: If convicted, the violator is subject to a $10,000 fine, ten years in jail, or both and if theft result, life in prison} Constitution of Florida -- DECLARATION OF RIGHTS--Article 1 Section 23 Right of privacy. Every natural person has the right to be let alone and free from governmental intrusion into the person’s private life except as otherwise provided herein. Dwane Eugene Kirkland Self Claimed Constitutional Officer-Investigator and Over-watch for public across the United States of America bound to the oath forever UCC 1-207 1-308 / without prejudice / Constitutional Continental Congress Senator / 11 Bravo Infantry / 1-10 Bill of Rights Advocate, MT nation. By trademark 2020 copy right by Kirkland bill of rights office usawritt@protonmail.com , Telephone: 406-369-0482 IN GOD WE TRUST {For the record public over 

Ron Flick's picture

Mr. Kirkland formally of Montana, has a website perhaps ??  where he has a TABLE OF CONTENTS listing all of what he has posted here, and in interference with the NLA market, which is not his creation but the work and toil of others.  Please redirect.

officerkirkland@icloud.com's picture

{From the bill of rights offices across the nation} 7/26/2020 7:19:35 PM Discovery / Notice! Public Servants…you ARE Criminally liable for violating the law! Violating the Oath of Office is A Federal Crime! Exaggerating the perception; I know nothing! I am not in charge! Well not according to the law! All public servants are accountable. So let us address accountability. 1/ Threshold Question: Is there something by or through your alleged Constitution that compels My performance?" -- If yes, "...then please enter it into the record of this matter." If no, "...then what am I doing here? Is there some manner of contract that is controlling? Can you show that I knowingly, willingly, and voluntarily, after full disclosure, signed on to something that bears the other party’s/your signature as well? 2/ The Constitution of the United States of America and the constitution of all sister states in harmony, including the Florida Constitution serve as operations manual, operational guidelines, binds for those who choose to be "Public Servants." Any elected or appointed official or Attorney refusing to honor an acceptance of their Oath is simply impersonating a public official. 3/ Florida Statutes Chapter 843.0855. Impersonating a Public Servant - 3rd degree felony. Criminal actions under color of law or through use of simulated legal process. — ( 3/ A person who deliberately impersonates or falsely acts as a public officer or employee in connection with or relating to any legal process affecting persons and property, or otherwise takes any action under color of law against persons or property, commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. It is the intent of the Legislature that this section applies if a person acts as an officer or employee purporting to supersede or override any legislation or statute of this state, or to supersede or override any action of any court of this state. (mandate since 1935 from Washington is that all the state governments standardize their state rules, procedures, and statutes.) 4/ One can also see, 18 USC Sec. 912, 01/03/95; EXPCITE: TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, PART I - CRIMES, CHAPTER 43 - FALSE PERSONATION; HEAD: Sec. 912. Officer or employee of the United States. STATUTE: Whoever falsely assumes or pretends to be an officer or employee acting under the authority of the United States or any department, agency or officer thereof, and acts as such, or in such pretended character demands or obtains any money, paper, document, or thing of value, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. See this and this for more information. by Thomas James Norton, (1941), America's Future, Inc., publisher: " 2 5/ In the Fifth Amendment the Nation is forbidden to deprive any one 'of life, liberty or property without due process of law'; and here the like command is issued by the people to the State. In the beginning it was National power that was feared. Experience later taught that the power of the State also may be tyrannical. Due process of law means, said the Supreme Court in a late case (1908), that 'no change in ancient procedure can be made which disregards those fundamental principles . . . which . . . protect the citizen in his private right and guard him against the arbitrary action of the government. 6/ Private property is taken, for public use in opening streets in cities, in constructing railways and canals, in erecting public buildings, in laying out public parks, and for kindred purposes. The owner cannot be deprived of his property for such purposes by the State without due process of law, that is, without a full hearing and adequate compensation." 7/ Neglect to Protect Provisions, including Florida State Penalty Against Abusive Public Servants under Oath of Office for stalking, exploitation, neglect to protect: Florida Chapter 784.048 Stalking: Willful, malicious, and repeated following or harassing. Penalty: Misdemeanor of the 1st degree Sentencing/Fines: 775.082, 083,084 mandatory minimum sentence of twenty-one (21) months imprison and can impose any additional penalties of: Up to five (5) years in prison, Up to five (5) years of probation, and Up to $5,000 in fines. 8/ Aggravated Stalking: Willful, malicious and repeated following or harassing another with credible threats with the intent to place person in reasonable fear of death or bodily injury; or willfully, maliciously, repeatedly follows or harasses minor under 16; or after injunction for protection or any court-imposed prohibition of conduct, knowingly, willfully, maliciously and repeatedly follows or harasses another person. Penalty: Felony of the 3rd degree Sentencing/Fines: 775.082, 083,084 mandatory minimum sentence of twenty-one (21) months imprison and can impose any additional penalties of: Up to five (5) years in prison, Up to five (5) years of probation, and Up to $5,000 in fines. 9/ Title 18 USC §1621 concerning the "neglect to protect" by persons under Oath, and Title 42 USC § 1986, wherein a person having "knowledge of the law", "the power to stop a wrong" and the "duty to prevent a wrong from being done" is liable for any failure to act. Should they fail to prevent a wrong, having knowledge of the law, the power to prevent, and the legal or moral duty to prevent the wrong, which causes deprivations of your religious and/or civil rights or Liberties, suit can be brought for violations. 10/ "Our safety, our liberty, depends upon preserving the Constitution of the United States as our Fathers made it inviolate. The people of the United States are the rightful masters of both Congress and the Courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution. 3 11/ " --Abraham Lincoln "Bind down the Public officials with the chains of the Constitution" Kirkland expose the public officials who violate the oath of delegated powers and offices and institutions, if they violate, they lose all power given to them, no liberty but death only when the errors of unconstitutional acts and fiduciary acts and encroachment and infringement with true intent of the violations of powers and due process and if not corrected in a timely manner, and brought to their attention then only they deserve the rope of history of the short ropes around there necks to the witness of public domain under god and invisible for liberty and justice for all. Notice to all defendant who violated the Amendments ,provisions, declaration of rights ,and articles 1-7, and the bill of rights in every state Constitutions and the supreme law of the agreement contract warranty of the compact agreement to govern by Constitution in harmony. See the pain and suffering attachment. 12/ I, Plaintiff __________________ challenge jurisdiction of this court on the grounds that the Constitution states that ALL matters in LAW and EQUITY must be conducted in an Article III court. If this court is not an Article III court, then Plaintiff _____________________ requests that the matter be transferred to an Article III court or dismissed with prejudice. 13/"He who does not deny, admits." The master asks the question and the slave or servant answers. One who is in a position of being the servant cannot question the demands of the master. 14/ The oath of office is a contract which financially binds you, the public servant, to honor the oath of office. The oath to which you swore to protect the Constitution. 1. You are a trustee of the public trust. 2. You have specific duties to members you serve. 3. You are public servants! 15/ As trustees regardless of your position, be it a member of a city council or a member of a county board of superiors, as a public servant you are responsible to your constituents to provide the same Constitutional protections as granted in the federal and state Constitutions. 16/Of special note is a Republic Form of government and an environment where one can pursue life liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Failure to provide such protections is a direct violation of your oath of office and a breach of your fiduciary obligations. 17/Under civil rights laws your failure to properly discharge your responsibilities in any of these matters exposes you to personal financial liability. Under the law, all your personal assets may be seized and LIQUIDATED to satisfy damage claims submitted by injured parties. That would be any citizen who feels their rights have been violated. 18/The oath of office has no limitations of any kind. The oath of office has no limitations or jurisdictions. The oath does however specify you must honor your oath and protect the Constitution from ALL enemies, domestic and foreign. 19/ As public servants, while acting within your official capacity, you have no rights whatsoever of your own…it is not your opinion that is important. It is only the concerns of the citizens that matter. As public employees—servants to the 4 people—You only have the duty to honor your oath and perform the work of the people as prescribed by law. 20/ You have no discretion as to whether you will honor your oath. You are directed to do so. There are no options other than to resign if you cannot fulfill the requirements, as necessary. Otherwise you are guilty of accepting employment under false pretenses and committing fraud. Under certain conditions, even if you retire or resign, you may be subject to prosecution for failing to properly execute your lawful job requirements. 21/ “This Constitution shall be the Supreme Law of the Land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding.” (U.S. Constitution, Article VI, paragraph 2.) See also Amendment 5 –“Just Compensation.” Isn’t your duty obvious?

officerkirkland@icloud.com's picture

Contract to Protect Plaintiffs’ Rights under the Oath of Office and under Article 6 Paragraph 2 For the state of ______________________ Dwane Kirkland U.C.C. 1-308 w/o prejudice Advocate-witness self-claimed Constitutional officer United States Constitutional Law-Advocacy and Investigations PO BOX 114 London Arkansas, 72847 usawritt@protonmail.com provisions@mail.com Public over-watch 11brv Infantry Telephone: 1406-369-0482 ******************** Plaintiff ___________________________ Civilian, Common Law, Private American Claimed Beneficiary U.C.C. 1-207 1-308 w/o prejudice All rights reserved, none waived ____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ Case # ___________________ Date: _____________________ ***************************** Pertaining to Oath of Office, Delegated Authority, and The Iron Clad Contract ***** To Whom It May Concern: 1. This contract protects the Plaintiff’s Constitutional rights by the agreement between the parties, the appointed attorneys, and anyone who is operating under the color of law or their oath of office or any contract between the People of all sister states in harmony. 2. Either sign the contract, agreeing to protect and to defend all the Plaintiff’s rights, as provided in the Constitutional amendments, articles, and declarations of rights at the state and federal level; or if you refuse to sign in agreement, then you have violated the actual law at the state and federal level. 3. According to the 6th and 7th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States of America, all due process clauses and the Bill of Rights are in harmony with all sister states under the compact agreement to govern by Constitutions, as the agreement between the People grants the delegated powers under the 10th Amendment. 2 {FOR THE RECORD} 4. The named iron clad contract, supreme law in harmony with case law Marbury v Madison 1803 states that a repugnant, unconstitutional law under the color of law must not be in conflict and that any clause or part at all in conflict shall be void null. 5. Under your oath of office and the protections of Article 6 paragraph 2, the supremacy clause, to preserve and to protect rights under the Constitution at the state and federal level are in perfect harmony with the compact agreement between the sister states in harmony. By your signature, you agree to protect Plaintiff’s rights and assets by the iron clad Constitutional Warranty. In God We Trust. Signature of Claimed Beneficiary, _________________________________ Printed Claimed Beneficiary Name: _________________________________ Civilian, Common Law, Private American, UCC1-207 1-308 without Prejudice Signature of Presiding Judge, ___________________________ If presiding judge refuses to protect Plaintiff’s rights and assets, check box [ ] Name of judge who refuses under the color of law: __________________________________________________ Signature of clerk of record, ___________________________ If the clerk recorder refuses documents motions and redress of grievances or any papers and effects, check box [ ] Name of clerk recorder or who refuses under the color of law: _________________________________________ Signature of Presiding Magistrate, ___________________________ If presiding magistrate refuses to protect Plaintiff’s rights and assets, check box [ ] Name of magistrate who refuses under the color of law: __________________________________________________ Signature of Plaintiff Attorney, ___________________________ If Plaintiff’s attorney refuses to protect Plaintiff’s rights and assets, check box [ ] Name of Plaintiff’s attorney who refuses under the color of law: __________________________________________________ 3 {FOR THE RECORD} Signature of Defendant Attorney, ___________________________ If Defendant attorney refuses to protect Plaintiff’s rights and assets, check box [ ] Name of Defendant’s attorney who refuses under the color of law: __________________________________________________ Signature of Police Officer or Sheriff, ___________________________ If police officer refuses to protect Plaintiff’s rights and assets, check box [ ] Name of police officer who refuses under the color of law: __________________________________________________ Notes for the Plaintiff and Attorney / Lawyer and Judge Full disclosure/Discovery facts: 1. God is the one who endowed you with these rights, and the constitution merely offers a legitimate program to protect those rights or to secure those rights and the blessings of those rights for ourselves and on our children for all times. It is important that you understand that the constitution God inspired, it’s important that you understand that a lot of the principles that are in the constitution actually come out of the Holy Bible, and it is very important that you understand that this constitution allows you each to be a king or queen in your own right, as long as you recognize one principle that you do not ever create a situation where you take away the rights of another. 2. When, rights have been violated, the next thing they will claim is “Well, we acted in good faith…We had good faith reliance that you broke the law…And that means you cannot sue us.” That is a lie since these two cases, Owen v. City Of Independence, 445 U.S. 622 (1980) and Maine v Thiboutot, 448 U.S.1 (1980). 3. Basically, what these two cases say is, “Where plain language of a statute supported by consistent judicial interpretation is strong, it is not necessary to look beyond the words of the statute.” These are both civil rights cases. “The right of action created by statute relating to deprivation under color of state law of a right secured by the constitution and the laws of the United States encompasses claims which are solely based on statutory violations of federal law, and applied to the claim that claimants had been deprived of their rights in some capacity, to which they were entitled.” 4. Now when ever his happens, folks, you must understand something that goes for both of these cases: Owen was a police chief in the town of Independence, Mo. He got into a gripe with the city council and they fired him without just cause. Owen turned around and sued. 5. They claimed that they acted in “good faith”: The Supreme Court said, “You are deemed to be officers of the law; you are to advise us of the law; you can hardly claim that you in good faith for willful deprivation of the law, and you certainly cannot claim ignorance of the law, because a citizen out here on the street cannot claim ignorance of the law. It makes the law look stupid if an officer of the court or some officer of government does not know the law and then they go ahead and abuse somebody’s constitutional rights.” 6. So in matters of constitutional rights both these cases uphold one point: Whenever they violate your constitutional rights they do so at their own peril. It even says that at Title 18 Sec 241, 242. It says that upon conviction you are subject to a $10,000 fine, 10 years in jail, or both, and if death results life in prison. They are telling you ‘Do not violate somebody’s rights.” 7. Unconstitutional Acts: 4 {FOR THE RECORD} The court follows the decision of the highest court in the state in construing the constitution and the laws of the state unless they conflict with or impair the efficacy of some principle of the constitution or of the federal statutes, a rule of the commercial or general law. The decision of the state courts and questions relating to the existence of its subordinate tribunals and the eligibility of election or appointment of their officers and the passage of its laws are conclusive upon federal courts. Now, the most important thing is ‘While acts of defacto incumbent of an office lawfully created by law, an existing are often held to be binding from reasons of public policy. That is a very important point…Public Policy. You want to watch out for the term ‘Public Policy…’ it is often confused with the state’s right of eminent domain of police powers. Police powers and public policy is almost the same thing, except that one is done without law because they want to, and the other is done because they are claiming a police authority to do so. When they are talking about public policy, the acts of the person assuming to fill and perform the duties of an office which does not exist can have no validity whatever in law. An unconstitutional act is not law. It confers no rights. Iit imposes no duties. It affords no protections. It creates no office. It is in legal contemplation as inoperative as though it had never been passed. Now, if you take these basic cases that we have gone over so far, you will have gone a long way in getting your constitutional rights back. This book (Citizens Handbook) includes the Constitution, jury instructions, arguments, and a lot more. Some of the important arguments in it go along with what I have been talking about. All laws which are repugnant to the constitution are null and void (Marbury v Madison 5 U.S. 137). Where rights secured by the constitution are involved there can be no rule or law making legislation which would abrogate abolish them Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 An unconstitutional act is not law. It confers no rights. It imposes no duties. It affords no protections. It creates no office. It is in legal contemplation as inoperative, as though it had never been passed (Norton v Shelby County 118 US 425). The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute though having the form and name of law in in reality no law, but is totally void. 16 Am Jur Vol. 2, sec 177, 256 Officers of the court have no immunity from liability when violating constitutional rights (Owen v. City Of Independence, 445 U.S. 622, and Maine v Thiboutot, 448 U.S.1). 8. Do not volunteer into the system. How do you volunteer? You watch what you sign number one. Any evidence of contracts where you enter into admiralty says that you are a party to the contract. So you avoid that. When you sign that bank draft to get into that bank in that Section 9 form, you fill out guess what. Look at the bottom. You signed to get into an admiralty maritime jurisdiction. What the hell would you want to do that for? It is illogical, when you signed up for that social security check. So how are we going to remedy this situation? 1-207 w/o prejudice. You sign anything that has to do with those guys, take the rights if they will give them to ya. Take the benefits, but make sure when you sign it you sign it UD 1-207 w/o prejudice. That makes you a common law citizen, and when they pull you into these courts and they claim they have jurisdiction over you, you say the first thing out of your mouth is you say: “Your honor, may it please the court, before this matter goes forward I wish to state that I am here on a special appearance as distinguished from a general appearance. And I am answering in the form of a demur.” A demur is an old way of pleading…It is an old fashioned, old country, barrister English way of pleading 5 {FOR THE RECORD} without granting jurisdiction. In other words, I will answer out of courtesy, and I will give you an answer out of courtesy, but at no time am I granting jurisdiction. Now I put on my brief I state my name, I state the _______________ in propria persona on a special appearance, as distinguished from a general appearance, for jurisdictional challenges. Now I have raised the jurisdictional challenges I am putting on the record. It is clearly cognizant that once jurisdiction is raised, the burden is on the ______________________ to prove jurisdiction, pursuant to McNutt v General Motors Acceptance 56 S.Ct. 502. “Jurisdiction may never be assumed but must be sustainably proven by the __________________.” If they do not prove it in a timely fashion, then latches incurs…Motion to dismiss your honor failure to state a cause of action for which relief may be granted, and I would kinda like to collect my costs and fees for having to defend this frivolous case. Let’s get into the Erie Railroad Case…. This is a railroad case: A guy was walking down the track and a board was hanging off the end of the train and whacked him up side of the head. He tried to sue in the state court and the state court hammered him. So what happened was Erie Railroad flipped around and they tried to sue him in the federal court to get back at him, and they thought that they were pulling a fast one, and what happened was the case bounced back on them. And guess what? When it bounced back it created an extremely dangerous thing. Now before this, I want you to understand that for a hundred years of the law, this case was the leading case. 9. McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. 316 (1819) is a very leading case…a very heavy case: This case upheld for 100+ years the single citizenship relationship, and it deals with the corporation ‘The power of establishing corporations is not a distinct sovereign power or end of government but only the means of carrying into effect other powers which are sovereign. Whenever it becomes an appropriate means of exercising any of the powers given by the constitution to the government of the union it may be exercised by that government. Now basically it sets up relationships. The bank of the United States has constitutionally a right to establish its branches or offices of discount or deposit in any state. The state within which such branch is established cannot without violating the constitution tax that branch. This was the law of the land, but it was replaced by Erie Railroad v Tompkins. “There is no federal general common law; congress has no power to declare substantive rules of common law applicable in a state whether they are local in their nature or general, whether they are commercial law or in part of the law of torts. No clause in the Constitution purports to confer such a power upon the federal courts except in the matters governed by the federal constitution or by acts of congress. The law to be applied in any case is the law of the state, and whether the law of the state shall be declared by its legislature in a statute, or by its highest court in a decision, not a matter of federal concern. “ 10. In disapproving the doctrine of the Swift v Tyson 41 U.S. 1 (1842), the court does not hold unconstitutional section 34 of the federal judiciary act of 1789 or any other act of congress. It merely declares that by applying the doctrine of that case rights which are reserved by the constitution to the several states have been invaded. That is how they can get away with having title 26 without having it enacted into positive law. They are claiming it is an act of congress. And if you voluntarily enter into it guess what…You bought the whole farm. 11. The federal court exercising jurisdiction over such a case on the ground of diversity to be of citizenship…Dual citizenship…Is not free to treat this question as one of so-called general law, but must apply the state law as declared by the highest state court…Swift v Tennyson overruled. 12. The liability of the railroad company for the injury caused by negligent operation of its train to its pedestrian on a much-used beaten path on its right-of-way…interstate…Along and near the rails depends, in the absence of federal or state statute, upon the unwritten law of the state where the accident occurred. Now what they are trying to do here is trying to justify the existence of this duality of citizenship between the common law citizen, which you are…most of you…and this national citizen, which would fall under title 26 6 {FOR THE RECORD} USC. But I’m telling you to look up section 6331(a) of title 26, and you will see that the secretary of the treasury has jurisdiction over corporations, officers of corporations, and officers of government residing in the District of Columbia, and artificial corporations, who are contractors of the fund. 13. Arguing Jurisdiction: Now this is an important case, if you are going to be in this seriously battling and want to argue jurisdiction…Which is a very good defense on almost anything they can pull on you, you are gonna have to read these cases: Erie Railroad v Tompkins 304 U.S. p. 64. It is vital that you understand these arguments. I just finished battling a United States Attorney, and we were arguing and he is talking about “This is all gibberish,” and I told him, I said: “Sir, I do not think you are well read on law.” All you have to do is read several of these cases and they will tell you that One, there is a duality of citizenship; Two, it has to be clearly defined and Three, I have defined it. 14. And now I am asking you to prove that I am not a party, or prove that I am a party, you tell me. It is your burden…You are the one making the complaint. You make the complaint; you get the burden of proof. Who says so? McNutt v General Motors Acceptance Corp. 56 S.Ct. 502. 15. You made it…You prove it. And if you do not prove it timely, I motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action for which relief can be granted, and I will beat your little tail. Now if you think this stuff does not work, let me tell you something here…today the government came and told me ‘motion dismissed’. The United States of America hereby moves pursuant to federal rules of criminal procedure for leave to dismiss the indictment. They cannot argue. 16. I do not care if we go to court…In fact I like it…‟Because I know who is going to win. And I pray to God that he will help me do that. 17. So, if they want to go to court, I tell them “Make my day.” When I’m in court and the guy tells me: “Well…we can get you for income tax evasion, and you might win one, but you won’t win them all, “ I looked at him most calmly and I said, “Sir, I’m gonna advise you to go look in those law books real carefully, because I’m gonna tell you straight arrow, I have had occasion to look in them law books, and I’m telling you, Sir, if you bring that complaint against me, I’m going to tell you to “make my day” ‘cause I’m a pretty serious fellow, and I’m not going to fool with you. I will sue your socks off and attach everything you own: bank, business, and home. So the best thing I can tell you, Sir, is that before you make a complaint, Sir, I would highly recommend that you seriously consider the merits of your facts before you go writing a bunch of drivel. 18. The bottom line is if you know your facts, and you got your stuff together I’m telling you that you can do this stuff. Now let’s talk about procedure. If you are going to go to court and be your own attorney, you must be sharp. You must keep records. You go to court you write it down. You get any paperwork; you write it down. You send them anything you write it down. Dates and times are vital. 19. If you do not take care of your own business…they are not going to do it for you…. You are your own attorney. If you want to be your own attorney, ya gotta have records and keep on top of things. Every time you do something you write it down…And you make sure you can go back and say ‘Yeah, I remember on such and such date at such and such a time this happened’. 20. You can construct a chronological order of events. Also write down all important numbers of anybody that has anything that has to be done. 7 {FOR THE RECORD} 21. Erie Railroad v Tompkins 304 U.S. p. 64: What this case does is it sets up a duality of citizenship. There are the citizens that live at the common law and there are citizens who live at the national law, or what is called admiralty maritime jurisdiction. Now the way they get away with putting this title 26 and 27 out the way they do it is they create this admiralty maritime jurisdiction, and if you volunteer into it, you are in it. If you step in it, it is on you. So I’m tellin’ you, don’t do that. 22. Do not volunteer into the system. How do you volunteer? You watch what you sign number one. Any evidence of contracts where you enter admiralty says that you are a party to the contract. So you avoid that. When you sign that bank draft to get into that bank in that Section 9 form, you fill out guess what. Look at the bottom. You signed to get into an admiralty maritime jurisdiction. What the hell would you want to do that for? It is illogical when you signed up for that social security check. 23. So how are we going to remedy this situation? 1-207 w/o prejudice. You sign anything that has to do with those guys, take the rights if they will give them to ya, take the benefits, but make sure when you sign it you sign it UD 1-207 w/o prejudice. That makes you a common law citizen, and when they pull you into these courts and they claim they have jurisdiction over you, you say the first thing out of your mouth is you say ‘Your honor, may it please the court, before this matter goes forward I wish to state that I am here on a special appearance as distinguished from a general appearance. And I am answering in the form of a demur. A demur is an old way of pleading…It is an old fashioned, old country, barrister English way of pleading without granting jurisdiction. 24. If they could levy against you, they would have jurisdiction…But if the levy against you and you pay them, you have just given them jurisdiction. You sign your documents; if you do not put down there UD 1- 207 w/o prejudice, guess what? You are in. Isn’t that fraud? And doesn’t fraud void the contract? You need to read, folks. You need to get one of these books and read it cover to cover. And you need to be able to rattle it off backwards and forwards upside and down. And you need to kick some tail and try to coordinate this program. 25. Your homework: Court Cases and Legal Quotes: Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803). McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. 316 (1819) Title 18 U.S. Code section 2381 Title 5 U. S. Code section 556 (d) Dejammer v Hoskill of Albany Erie Railroad v Thompkins Am Jur vol. 16, sec. 97 Am Jure 16. Sec 114 – 117 Am Jure 16, sec 165 Am Jur 2nd sec 177 Declaratory judgments 16 Am Jur sec 255 Am Jur 256: Am Jur 257 16 Am Jur Vol. 2, sec 177, 256 Am Jur 258 Am Jur 260: Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943) Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969) Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, 373 U.S. 262 (1963 Peterson v City of Greenville, 373 U.S. 244 (1963) U. S. v Bishop, 412 U. S. 346 (1973)… Owen v. City Of Independence, 445 U.S. 622 (1980) Maine v Thiboutot, 448 U.S.1 (1980). Bryars v United States, 273 U. S. 28 (1927). Boyd v United States,116 US 616 Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). Norton v Shelby County, 118 US 425 Marbury v Madison 5 U.S. 137 United States v Dougherty 473 fed 2nd, 113 Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. 264 (1821) Johnson v. Manhattan Railway Co., 289 U.S. 479 (1933) Marshall v Kansas City, Mo. 35 sw 2nd, p 877 @*********************** Facts Upon Investigation: We know for a fact that attorneys, lawyers, public defenders, state attorneys, and district attorneys only have two years of contract law from law school; and we know that they only have one semester of actual law; the Constitutional Am Jur Prudent. Then they branch into their specialty in law; such as, divorce, tax, 8 {FOR THE RECORD} criminal, admiralty, patent and trademark, etc. Due to the fact that attorneys, lawyers, public defenders, state attorneys, and district attorneys have very limited education in law, they have no clue about the actual law, common law, maximums of law, God’s law, or any of the provisions, Amendments, Declaration of Rights, and the basic Articles 1 through 7, and the Bill of Rights--they are not competent to actually prosecute or to defend anyone who is invoking individual rights, as We the People, the Plaintiff is in this matter. Mr. Kirkland and Team members Constitutional law studies Amjur prudent 16, Shepard citations case law records {common law gods law}

@rutharcle's picture

Gerard: (echo) Who’s in the queue
 
Dan: Be encouraged if you are dealing with an estate you certainly want to stand up for what in case someone is trying to avert or challenge the wheel you have the right to speak Next kin or someone that would be of confidence and able to help you and sit beside of you before a Clerk of court proceeding According to North Carolina Chapter 47 Probate and procedure This document is about 50 pages two sided print Jurisdictions with the Clerk That is not a Court of record It operates under color of court You would be able to participate and stand your own maybe with assistance of a Next friend to help people stand against unlawful foreclosures The more you get around people that are of knowledge and looking through what is being made available to you
 
02:00:01
 
I hope you will see how you could readily see an opportunity for you and your family for here centuries to come even I feel that certain about this and with the very diverse speakers that are no doubt of very knowledgeable as you can understand we are very honored to have Mr Brent Allan Winters to expound on documents you would never be able to ever hear or even come close to the truth and that goes for Mr John Darash or Gerard These guys also speaks on various radio syndicates We need to do what Mr John Darash was telling us All of us are falling short and this is where we can catch up and become knowledgeable Anyone that’s wanting to seek the truth the doors are open to you and come every Monday night and see for yourself go to the website National Liberty Alliance is just commendable and what these parties are there trying to show us and we need to unite with these individuals that care about America but they care because they stand for the truth They will not stand for anything else but the truth So I could say a lot more here Those that may be fearful of someone unlawfully trying to steal their home from them about all I can say is besides getting the help from when you don’t get the right results if there’s fraud there rest assured you need to hurriedly get before this medium here and learn exactly a defense and in regard to someone stealing your property that’s fraud and that is clearly right there that you are not being subjected to nothing but fraud if someone is trying to steal your property unless a 12-man Jury so judge and you demand that in your