New York Safe Act Lawsuit

PRELIMINARY HEARING IS SET FOR JULY 2, 2018 AT 10 AM

CHECK BACK OFTEN FOR UPDATES AND FILINGS

NLA MEMBERS WILL RECEIVE UPDATES VIA EMAIL



King Andrew Cuomo and all his legislative turncoats in Albany have taken pistol licenses control away from our Sheriffs and have passed control to the State Police. This means when the self-appointed king wants our guns he need only give the order to the State Police Superintendent who will obey his master or be fired unlike the Sheriffs who refused to obey the last infringement upon our Unalienable 2nd Amendment Right.

We need to push back now! Therefore NLA New York members are filing an action in the Federal Court in the Northern District of New York.

To join our filing as a Plaintiff download and fill out and notarize an affidavit and general information page.We still have time to add more plaintiffs and will post here when the window closes.

DOWNLOAD AFFIDAVIT.pdf and Mail Affidavit with $50 or more to cover our cost to:

National Liberty Alliance (make checks/money order to NLA)
3979 Albany Post Road, Suite 107
Hyde Park, New York, 12538

I am confident that with the draining of the swamp in Washington, the times they are a changing, and we can win this issue in the Federal Court in Albany. We all need to take a stand NOW or lose our guns.

We will be suing for the following:

  1. Court is to order the State to stand down and all County Sheriffs to protect us from any State Police action.
  2. We will also move the court for an Injunction until the case is settled.
  3. And finally for Monetary damage of $50,000 for each plaintiff

NOTICE: You must act quickly once we file the suit it will be to late to join the suit. We will post all court filings and responses on this page below.

Join NLA to receive lawsuit updates by email and take our FREE Constitutional and Civics course and our higher education. Any one living in NY can join the filing and there is no requirement to join NLA membership. But if you are not a NY NLA member you will not be receiving email updates, therefore you will need to visit this page for the latest updates.

Also CLICK HERE TO: JOIN OUR MONDAY NIGHT TELECONFERENCE where you can ask questions and offer suggestions.

CLICK HERE to Support NLA's efforts to save our Republic by donating $5 a month or more thats only $60 a year.

The following 2nd Amendment Action at Law was filed against the Governor and both houses of New York State in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, Case# 1:18-cv-392.

Watch the following videos and join our comprehensive plan to save the Republic, because Only the People can Save America!



Comments

jf6363's picture

Anyone see this, Asm Dipietro on the  New York Assembly floor 3,2 million forthe NY Safe act and Cuomo's secret police force?Is this not in your face Treason.Could we not get a Grand Jury investigation on this?
https://vimeo.com/262714602

mrbagobeans's picture

Have you filed an affidavit with the other brave Plaintiffs in the lawsuit in support of your 'God given, constitutionally protected, inalienable right and duty'. It is clear that they know what they're doing is in violation of the law, and various statutes also.

Chopper's picture

Possible scenario for why taking away guns from civilians won’t work.
 
We hear all the time about how certain groups of people want to take away the guns from American civilians to avoid shootings like what has been happening in the past few years. Ok, let’s pretend it did happen and now only law enforcement has guns, and no civilians can possess a firearm of any kind. Aside from being able to protect ourselves from immediate intruders to our homes to which no 911 call is going to get law enforcement there fast enough to handle the situation, let’s take something else into consideration.
A small town of say 5000 might have how many officers on duty at any given time, maybe 10? That’s probably close enough for this scenario to consider. Now, with that allocation of officers and any one of them could be just like a “normal” American citizen assigned to help protect all of the other 4990 citizens for an 8 or 12 hour shift, what happens when one of those goes berserk for whatever reason and starts killing everyone around him because he KNOWS they don’t have any guns and can’t defend themselves? The other officers come to save the day? Nope, they all trusted one another and he has systematically shot them all in the back at various locations he called them to. No one knows what he is doing.
The nearest town from there is say, 50 miles. A citizen hears gunfire, calls the police and no one answers. They call the nearest town police, and at 50 miles away, how long do you think it’s going to take for help to arrive? How many bullets will be shot by that time? How many people will die because they had their weapons taken away from them?
There is absolutely no guarantee that when the guns are taken away from civilians that something like this or similar won’t happen. Not only is it ILLEGAL to prevent people from being able to protect themselves, it is morally unacceptable. If a common everyday citizen can go nuts and shoot up a movie theatre, then what’s to say a police officer would not do that too? There isn’t any guarantee such a thing would not happen. There are far too many bad police officers vs good ones to justify any sort of gun control that prevents citizens from protecting themselves.
The scenario presented here could happen on any scale, whether it’s a small town or a big one, one officer or a group of rogue officers, and it would be like shooting fish in a barrel.
All of us have the unalienable right to protect ourselves with any means necessary.
We also have the constitutional right to protect ourselves which includes the right to keep and bear arms, and it shall not be infringed upon.
Just to clarify what was just said, let’s define the word infringe…
in·fringe
verb
past tense: infringed; past participle: infringed
actively break the terms of (a law, agreement, etc.).
"making an unauthorized copy would infringe copyright"
synonyms:       contravene, violate, transgress, break, breach; disobey, defy, flout, fly in the face of; disregard, ignore, neglect; go beyond, overstep, exceed; infract
"the statute infringed constitutionally guaranteed rights"
act so as to limit or undermine (something); encroach on.
"his legal rights were being infringed"
synonyms:       restrict, limit, curb, check, encroach on; undermine, erode, diminish, weaken, impair, damage, compromise
"the surveillance infringed on his rights"
 
Guess what that means?
That means you cannot limit any action of a person who is attempting to gain a firearm for their own protection. You cannot remove any firearm from the possession of a person. It has no bearing on any type of firearm as well. If there are any laws, statutes or regulations that violate the second amendment, they are illegal.
 

"Whensoever the General Government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force." - Thomas Jefferson

"Government is instituted for the common good; for the protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness of the people; and not for profit, honor, or private interest of any one man, family, or class of men; therefore, the people alone have an incontestable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to institute government; and to reform, alter, or totally change the same, when their protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness require it." - John Adams

"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution." - Abraham Lincoln

"The First Amendment has created a wall of separation between the church and the State. But that wall is one directional. It is to keep the government from running the Church. But it is not to keep Christian principles out of the government." - Thomas Jefferson

K9Sheps's picture

Hey Guys, I am being inundated with questions about the date for the filing of injunction re" Re-Cert of CCW Permits.

jf6363's picture

I would be interested in the stats.I don't have your contact info.Could you post them here?If as few people are re certifiying as i suspect i believe they will extend the deadline or some other safe face action.I know there is a state senator that introduced a bill for extention.(so she says)

jf6363's picture

Is there a time frame  or date for acting on this lawsuit yet?Is there any information out there on how many gun owners have not re-certified yet?

Jan@NLA's picture

The Safe Act requires that people must begin registering there guns on February 1, 2018. Therefore, we must file our injunction etc before that date, so if you want to be incluced, you need to act now. If you wait till the last minute and there is a problem with your paperwork, you may miss this opportunity. I have no idea how many people have already re-certified their guns.

mrbagobeans's picture

Please post the stats in comment section

wecone's picture

sent you stats to your email.  Please post