REPUBLIC REVIEW


THE IRREFUTABLE ARGUMENT FOR REPUBLIC REVIEW

© Mobius Strip Press LLC
www.reclaimingtherepublic.org
www.mobiusstrippress.com

REPUBLIC REVIEW ARGUMENT IN BULLET FORMAT

  1. In accordance with Article Seven of the Constitution, the Constitution is a compact/contract written “for” and “by” the States
  2. The legal definition of “ratification” is: “the action of signing or giving formal consent to a treaty, compact/contract, or agreement, making it officially valid”
  3. For the compact/contract to be given force it required a threshold of “Stakeholders” buy‐in (“State” buy‐in)

(2) In accordance with Article Seven and Article Five the States are THE principal Stakeholders of this compact/contract. Consequently, ONLY the States possess SOVEREIGNTY over the compact/contract; thus:

  • Only the States could ratify the Constitution
  • Only the States possess the authority to ratify amendments
  • Conversely, the Constitution does not grant the authority to the Supreme Court, the President, or Congress to ratify the Constitution or an Amendment to the Constitution; therefore they are not PRINCIPALParties to this compact/contract.

(3) In accordance with the Ninth and Tenth Amendments, the States are the SOVEREIGNS who possess Supremacy over all things not delegated to the general (i.e. Federal) government within the Compact/contract.

  • The general government supremacy is limited to ONLY those objects/powers delegated by the States within the Compact/contract to the general government, ratified amendments to the Constitution andconstitutionally ratified Treaties (See Article Six Section Two)
  • Accordingly, the States delegated specific, defined and limited ROLES, RESPONSIBILITIES,AND POWERS (RRPs) within the compact/contract (i.e. Constitution) to the general governmentand the general government was constrained per the compact/contract from doing anything that wasnot specifically delegated to it within the compact/contract (See Article Six Section Two, and theNinth and Tenth Amendments)

(4) The only way the general government can Constitutionally obtain a new RRP is by requesting that the States delegate the desired RRP to them (the general government) via an Amendment to the Constitution in accordance with the Constitutional amendment process. The “General Welfare and Defense,” “Commerce,” “Necessary and Proper,” and “Supremacy” clauses are not ambiguous portals for the general government to assume new RRP’s. These clauses only apply to the RRPs enumerated in the Constitution and Amendments http://reclaimingtherepublic.org/ http://www.mobiusstrippress.com/ to the Constitution that have been ratified and Treaties constitutionally ratified by two thirds of the Senate (See Article Six, The Ratification Debates, Madison’s Veto of the 1817 Bonus Bill, and Federalist Papers)

(5) Politicians, Jurists, Lawyers, Officers, officials, professors, and persons claiming profound understanding of the Constitution within and outside of the general government since 1791 have used lies, deceit, and collusion to convince the States to allow the general government the ability to assume unconstitutional RRPs without following the codified process within the Constitution (See The Ratification Debates and Madison’s Veto of the 1817 Bonus Bill, and the Federalist Papers)

  • Therefore, all RRP’s being exercised that cannot be found within the Constitution and the ratified Amendments are blatant violations of the Constitution and usurpations of States’ RRPs andsovereignty (See Ratification Debates, Madison’s Veto of the Bonus Bill, and the Federalist Papers)
  • For almost two centuries the general government and public servants at all levels have failed to comply with the Constitution as ratified and now our Republic is in grave peril due to theseusurpations.

THE IRREFUTABLE ARGUMENT FOR REPUBLIC REVIEW

Republic Review Argument in Bullet Format
(1) In accordance with Article Seven of the Constitution, the Constitution is a compact/contract written “for”
and “by” the States

  • The legal definition of “ratification” is: “the action of signing or giving formal consent to a treaty,compact/contract, or agreement, making it officially valid”
  • For the compact/contract to be given force it required a threshold of “Stakeholders” buy‐in (“State”buy‐in)

(2) In accordance with Article Seven and Article Five the States are THE principal Stakeholders of this compact/contract. Consequently, ONLY the States possess SOVEREIGNTY over the compact/contract; thus:

  • Only the States could ratify the Constitution
  • Only the States possess the authority to ratify amendments
  • Conversely, the Constitution does not grant the authority to the Supreme Court, the President, or Congress to ratify the Constitution or an Amendment to the Constitution; therefore they are not

PRINCIPAL Parties to this compact/contract.
(3) In accordance with the Ninth and Tenth Amendments, the States are the SOVEREIGNS who possess
Supremacy over all things not delegated to the general (i.e. Federal) government within the
Compact/contract.

  • The general government supremacy is limited to ONLY those objects/powers delegated by the States within the Compact/contract to the general government, ratified amendments to the Constitution and constitutionally ratified Treaties (See Article Six Section Two).
  • Accordingly, the States delegated specific, defined and limited ROLES, RESPONSIBILITIES, AND POWERS (RRPs) within the compact/contract (i.e. Constitution) to the general governmentand the general government was constrained per the compact/contract from doing anything that was http://reclaimingtherepublic.org/ http://www.mobiusstrippress.com/ not specifically delegated to it within the compact/contract (See Article Six Section Two, and theNinth and Tenth Amendments)

(4) The only way the general government can constitutionally obtain a new RRP is by requesting that the States delegate the desired RRP to them (the general government) via an Amendment to the Constitution in accordance with the Constitutional amendment process. The “General Welfare and Defense,” “Commerce,” “Necessary and Proper,” and “Supremacy” clauses are not ambiguous portals for the general government to assume new RRPs. These clauses only apply to the RRPs enumerated in the Constitution and Amendments to the Constitution that have been ratified and Treaties constitutionally ratified by two thirds of the Senate (See Article Six, The Ratification Debates, Madison’s Veto of the 1817 Bonus Bill, and Federalist Papers)

(5) Politicians, Jurists, Lawyers, Officers, officials, professors, and persons claiming profound understanding of the Constitution within and outside of the general government since 1791 have used lies, deceit, and collusion to convince the States to allow the general government the ability to assume unconstitutional RRPs without following the codified process within the Constitution (See the Ratification Debates and Madison’s Veto of the 1817 Bonus Bill, and the Federalist Papers)

• Therefore, all RRPs being exercised that cannot be found within the Constitution and the ratified Amendments are blatant violations of the Constitution and usurpations of States’ RRPs and
sovereignty. (See Ratification Debates, Madison’s Veto of the Bonus Bill, and the Federalist Papers)
• For almost two centuries the general government and public servants at all levels have failed to comply with the Constitution as ratified and now our Republic is in grave peril due to these
usurpations.

(6) This audit is what Madison and Jefferson attempted to accomplish in 1798 with the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions. (see the article Nullification of Interposition by G. R. Mobley)

  • Jefferson audited the Constitution in his letter to the Kentucky State Legislators in 1798 (See Kentucky Resolutions of 1798 and 1799).
  • Madison called for the State to fulfill their duty to protect their State and citizen from despotic government calling on the other States “that the necessary and proper measures will be taken by each, for co‐operating with this state, in maintaining the Authorities, Rights, and Liberties, referred to the States respectively, or to the people.” (See Virginia Resolution of 1798 and James Madison, Report on the Virginia Resolutions 1800)

(7) Republic Review is what Madison and Jefferson attempted with Virginia and Kentucky when these States called upon their fellow Stakeholders to join them in rebuking the general government for violating their Constitution (See Kentucky Resolutions of 1798 and 1799 and see the article Nullification
of Interposition by G. R. Mobley)

  • Their fellow States failed to fulfill their obligation of oversight over their compact/contract which is why Madison and Jefferson were not successful in conducting Republic Review and why Jefferson lamented in the Kentucky Resolution of 1799 and Madison lamented in Madison’s 1800 Notes on the Virginia Resolutions.
  • The first and obvious action was nullification of these ACT’s but if that is what they were seeking then they would not have recommended the others actions in these Resolutions or lamented when the other States failed to respond in kind.

(8) In harmony with Madison and Jefferson’s actions the audit only requires one State to initiate and call for
Republic Review (See Republic Review Process Model)




Comments

Infamous Keny's picture

To fully understnd, you must READ the actual handwritten Journals of Congress, House and Senate (on the original parchment), 1793 - 1799  ...  The members of Congress were VERY Perplexed that the Amercan People would almost IMMEDIATELY DEMAND Congress engage in legislation EXPRESSLY Forbidden by the union Constitution, and "write laws applicable withint and throughout the several union States!!!
 
After several Members of the House lost re-election due to their NOT pasiing legislation applicable withint and throughout the several union States, they started developing a way to ALLOW those who want to be subjects of Congress to do so ... CREATE, within the district of Columbia, under Congress plenary power to legislate for the district, several Municipal Corporations that could OFFER BENEFITS in exchange for SUBJECTION to the Acts of Congres enacted for the Corporations, and thier beneficiaries!!!
 
Initially there were: City of Washington; then District of Columbia (note "D" is capitalized); United States, UNITED STATES, United States of America, and UNITED STSTES OF AMERICA; and subsequently additional corporations, departments, subdivisions, and agencies to SELL Benefits in exchange for RIGHTS!!!
 
You may also FIND the foundations for the term "FIREARM" (no protected Rights)  -v-  Arms, the RIGHT to Keep and Bear recognized and protected by and through the Second Amendment!!!    READ the ststutes ... all "GUN CONTROL" Acts are exclusively applicable to FIREARMS, and NOT Arms!!!
 
GO TO THE SOURCES ... NATIONAL ARCHIVES, LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, SUPREME COURT LAW LIBRARY!!!   WOW ... Big wake up if you'll simply open your eyes and mind and after PRAYER, search those resources;
 
If you believe in God, by whatever name(s) you my reference him by, you purport to have something called FAITH in that ALMIGHTY God ... but if you have FAITH that you are doing God's will, and nothing can happen without God's consent and PLAN ... how can you POSSIBLY be afraid of "what might happen if I ...", or an imaginary BUG (germiphobia Pandemic), or anything else???????  EVERYTHING that happens is a part of God's PLAN ... even my losing my legs ... don't fully understnd why yet, but God has a SPECIFIC REASON for taking my legs, I just have to have FAITH and ask him to show me the opportunities he is CREATING by taking my legs!!!!!!!   WAKE UP FOLKS ... and remember Job.   Lucifer challenged God ... If you'll just let me destroy his family and businesses, Job will curse you! ... God knew better, acepted the challenge, and Job had 7 years of loss of lifestyle, then God REWARDED Job with more than he had ever had before ... CLUE Folks.
 
"Keny"
Kenneth-Wayne.

Lee J Draper's picture

Skip Content

               Find Your Senators               Alabama               Alaska               Arizona               Arkansas               California               Colorado               Connecticut               Delaware               Florida               Georgia               Hawaii               Idaho               Illinois               Indiana               Iowa               Kansas               Kentucky               Louisiana               Maine               Maryland               Massachusetts               Michigan               Minnesota               Mississippi               Missouri               Montana               Nebraska               Nevada               New Hampshire               New Jersey               New Mexico               New York               North Carolina               North Dakota               Ohio               Oklahoma               Oregon               Pennsylvania               Rhode Island               South Carolina               South Dakota               Tennessee               Texas               Utah               Vermont               Virginia               Washington               West Virginia               Wisconsin               Wyoming             

 
MENU

  VIEW ARCHIVED FLOOR PROCEEDINGS

How to Contact U.S. Senators
 

 

You can contact your senators by writing a letter or a message using your senator's web contact form, by calling, or by visiting. All questions and comments regarding public policy issues, legislation, or requests for personal assistance should be directed to the senators from your state. Please be aware that as a matter of professional courtesy, many senators will acknowledge, but not respond to, a message from another senator’s constituent.

Senators' Contact Forms
When sending messages to your senator, please include your return postal mailing address.  
Postal Mail
Please include your return postal mailing address when corresponding with a Senate office.

  • You can download the list of senators names and addresses and convert this into a spreadsheet for easy management of senators' names and office addresses.

            Directions:            1) Go to  the senators contact page and click the XML link.            2) Save the file to your desktop.            3) Using Excel, or your preferred spreadsheet, open the XML file.            4) If the program prompts you to choose a display for the information "Open as a XML table".

  • You can also direct postal correspondence to your senator as follows:

    The Honorable (Name)    United States Senate    Washington, D.C. 20510

    Dear Senator (Name)

        For correspondence to a Senate committee or to a Senate committee chair:

    (Name of Committee)    United States Senate    Washington, D.C. 20510

or

    The Honorable (Name)    Chairman, Committee on (Name)    United States Senate    Washington, D.C. 20510

Telephone
You may phone the U.S. Capitol Switchboard at (202) 224-3121. A switchboard operator will connect you directly with the Senate office you request.

Virtual Reference Desk
For information on the Senate, Congress, the legislative process and the federal government, the Virtual Reference Desk is a good place to begin.

Active Legislation
To find a list of issues currently being discussed in the U.S. Senate see, Commonly Searched for Legislation .

Former Senators
Find out how to research the collections of former Senators.

Contact   |   Content Responsibility   |   Usage Policy   |   PDF Help   |   Privacy Policy   |   www.senate.gov