CREATE / TAKE CONTROL of Court(s)

The two Monday calls I've heard are COSISTENTLY, during Q&A, focused on controlling the Jurisdiction and Venue of a COURT; THE FOLLOWING STYLE /SUBSTANCE of Pleading /Process has repeatedly had Judges RUN SCREAMING FROM THE BENCH!!!  (SEE ALSO posts on "TRAFFIC" case/Ticket Response(s)).
 
(FIRST: Do the research for your union State similar to the EVIDENCE Recorded at Pierce county, Washington, Recorder’s file #200009130560 – REALWORLD (on the soil) VS. MATRIX (Corporate “state”) and get it PUBLISHED in your County Recorder’s Office (or, usually less expensive, district of Columbia Recorder’s Records))
 
NOTE: Brackets invoke "FOUR CORNERS DOCTRINE" and  ARE NOT AN ACTUAL PART OF AN INSTRUMENT.
[COURT of General or Limited Jurisdiction  CAPTION](DO NOT use ALL CAPS NAMES)(Put names of Party(s), Date, and Instrument Title CENTERED-Vertical)State of Creation                            )
                                                       )            SS.
House of Leaming                          )
[NOTICE you are acting under God’s LAW brought through YOUR Family!]
          Kenneth-Wayne, herein {counter}CLAIMANT, being subject to penalty for bearing false witness, under the law of Jehovah-Elohim, [E.R. 603] and affirms CLAIMANT is of age of majority, competent to testify, and having firsthand knowledge, STATES AND DECLARES:
INTRODUCTION
    1. CLAIMANT comes in good faith, peace and honor, and for curing any defects along the way; and,
    2. CLAIMANT hereby Affirms acceptance the Oath of Office Contract and surety(s) of the Officers of the Court and any and all PUBLIC ACTOR(s) as Identified above or as may have opportunity to act in /on the instant ACTION, fiduciary(s) of their respective office(s), whether Judge, Clerk, Attorney, or otherwise [YOUR state info here(“State of Washington”,a Territorial Municipal Corporation created 23 Dec. 1889),and OFFICER(S)/ Employee(s) on Duty and Participating from time to time in Act(s) and /or Omission(s), herein “FIDUCIARY ACTOR(s)”; and,
    3. The ACCEPTANCE(s) is/are applicable as to CLAIMANT, and others similarly situated (Constituents to “We the People ...”), relating to said FIDUCIARY ACTOR(s); and,
    4. CLAIMANT hereby provides the FIDUCIARY ACTOR(s) Mandatory NOTICE, E.R. 201, of the FACT that in the event any Judicial Officer takes SILENT JUDICIAL NOTICE of any FACT, and fails to declare the taking of such NOTICE upon the Record CLAIMANT hereby provides MANDATORY NOTICE [ER 201] that such OMISSION provides PRIMA FACIE Proof of the INTENT to Deny CLAIMANT the Due Process OPPORTUNITY be heard on the propriety of taking such Judicial Notice, as Referenced and Taught by the JUDICIAL COLLEGE (Nevada)in its curriculum and other Training Videos; and,
    5. [Use your State’s INFO in this Paragraph]CLAIMANT is a Constituent to The State of Washington, AD 1878, admitted to the union upon its Constitution appearing as Senate Document 66, on 22 February, 1889, and as such is a Constituent member to "We the People ..", and is NOT a subject to the Territorial Municipal Corporation created by the Territorial Legislature on 23 December, 1889, whose process name is "State of Washington", and said "State of Washington" assumed fiduciary responsibility for The State of Washington (supra) during the transition to the 1878 Washington Republic, which, to date, has not occurred, as are others similarly situated and,
    6. CLAIMANT relies in Good Faith on the FACT that those who left a record of Due Process law and procedure over the centuries did NOT commit fraud in leaving a record of Matthew 18:15-18, Magna Charta of 15 June 1215, Declaration of Interdependence of 04 July 1776, Federalist Papers of October 1787 – August 1788, Constitution for the union of the several united States of America of 1789 – 1791 (union Constitution); and the Congressional enactment of the ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES ACT(s) of 11 June 1946, Pub. L. 79-404/ 60 Stat. 237 as amended: and recognized by the “State of Washington” (supra) legislature through enactment of 1988 c 4 as amended, and inclusive of the provision setting forth that Judicial Review of a CLAIM is limited to the FACT(s) appearing in the underlying Administrative Record by EVIDENCE; and,
RECORD
    7. [Paragraph(s) 6-8 for COUNTERCLAIM ONLY]COUNTERCLAIMANT is unable to find, in/on the Record of the instant court, any reference to and/or inclusion of, by reference and/or Exhibit, ANY Administrative Record, much less an Administrative Record having EVIDENCE Appearing therein; and,
    8. WHEREFORE COUNTERCLAIMANT States that there appears no underlying Record upon which the instant ACTION could State a Claim upon which relief could be granted; and,
    9. COUNTERCLAIMANT is aware that the one supreme Court of the union, as established by Article III of the union Constitution, has repeatedly RULED that each and every Element of Jurisdiction MUST Appear in the Record OF AN ACTION or there is NO JURISDICTION and COUNTERCLAIMANT is unable to locate in the record of the instant ACTION any Appearance of EVIDENCE of each and every element of Personum, Subject Matter, and Venue Jurisdictions and therefore STATES, in Good Faith Reliance that the one supreme Court did NOT COMMIT FRAUD in its published JURISPRUDENCE ...