I LISTENED TO QUESTIONS - ANSWERS - DISCUSSION ALL EVENING ... :
All evening I heard about RIGHTS being STOLEN ... BULL-SHIT - You have GIVEN THEM AWAY by REFUSING to ACT, Administartive - then - Judicial ... EVERY TIME YOU SEE /HEAR OF AN OFFICIAL ACTING /FAILING TO ACT - IN BREACH OF OATH OF OFFICE CONTRACT ...I've been TERMINATING the Employment by actions on BOND for BREACH for many years now ... about 12 years ago I had contact with a Pierce county Deputy Sheriff ... and he Immediately "RAN MY NAME" ... When Dispatch responded the RESPONS WAS: "DO NOT ARREST - DO NOT DETAIN - CALL RISK MANAGMENT IMMEDIATELY ... and after a short pause: " Call Craig Adams (the Sherif's private - in house- Attorney) Immediately" ... the Deputy promptly called Craig Adams within the Sheriff's personal office (cell phone - speakerphone) and was told: "IF THAT MAN IS NOT HAPPY WHEN YOU LEAVE - YOU WILL NOT HAVE A JOB TOMORROW."
Yes, it does Work. Two days ago there was an incident in the Apartment Building where I dwell (SWAT, etc. - four hours) ... TWO Sergeants, One Lt. and One Captain, upon seeing me, said "HELLO BOSS" ... They know I'm their BOSS because (I'm sure) my Picture is POSTED in Every Seattle Police Precinct!!!
Yesterday I went to the King County Courthouse /Clerk's Office to File an ACTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Leaming, et al. -vs- Bezos, et al.) and several times while I was waiting for paperwork /process, the CUSTOMER SERVICE MANGER for the Clerk's Office came out and after explaining what was happening, asked what more he could do to help!!!
IT WORKS ... if you will work it!!!
======== ==========
MALUM PROHIBITUM -VS- MALUM EN-SE 'CRIMES':
Malum en-se Crimes are INHERENTLY WRONG ... Rape, Robbery, Murder, Battery (inclusive of assault), Theft, Vandalism (intentional property damage), Torture, etc.;
Malum Prohibitum - BECAUSE I SAID SO Law - just like my mother's "Law" - no substantive basis, just Politically, Theologically, motivated -OR- based on the Hysteria of the moment ... "YOU HAVE TO WEAR A MASK - ITS THE LAW" ... Vice "crimes", Prostitution, gambling, alcohol, 'Drugs', Polygamy, etc.,
FOR EXAMPLE: I met a nice lady at my community swimming pol a number of years ago, turned out she was a Prostitute, and had just been subjected ti a STING operation /Investigation, and when she had the "John" (Deputy-detective) on the massage table, and there was OFFER - ACCEPTANCE - and EXCHANGE OF VALUABLE CONSIDERATION (money), the other Detectives burst in and arrested her ... and she paid an Attorney $10,000.00 to get her a Good Deal (Plea Bargain) ... UNTIL she met Me, and I asked if I could see the Police Report and Charging Instruments copies she had been given ... We initiated an Administrative CLAIM(s) Process against each involved Detective (names in Report(s) /Charging Instruments), the Pierce County Sheriff whose Name and Office they Acted in, the County Prosecutor and deputies who signed theCharging pleadings, the state Attorney General, and the Governor EVIDENCING (Everything in AFFIDAVIT Form with actual copies of Police Reports and Carging Pleadings as EVIDENCE /EXHIBITS, and a copy of Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution for the union of the several united States of America, 1798 - 1791, - "NO STATE SHALL MAKE ANY LAW IMPAIRING THE OBLIGATIONS OF CONTRACTS" - (as incorporated by reference in each Oath of Office CONTRACT the performance of which is SECURED by Official BOND /Surety(s), and RE-ITERATING that the Police Report(s) AND Charging Pleadings ALL stated that the basis for the arrest /prosecution was OFFER and ACCEPTANCE (sexual activity for "money") and Exchange of Vauable Consideration (give - receive "Money" (THE VERY DEFINITION OF "CONTRACT" as recognized by Law (UCC) and EACH Respondent (Official) had put into writing was the foudation of the "Investigation", and each was in BREACH of Oath /CONTRACT and subject to the consequential FORFEITURE OF BOND /Surety, -AND- also DEMANDED the Deputy be placed back on the Massage Table so she (my neighbor) could FULFILL THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CONTRACT (finish the sex act(s) agreed to) ....... and SUDDENLY ALL EVIDENCE (Reports, case notes, accusatory Pleadings, case numbers, etc. CEASED TO EXIST ( the Attorney had to REFUND $7000.00 after COMPLAINING about her submitting the Claims!) -AND- for the next (about 7 years) that I stayed in contact with her - she continued to follow her chosen CAREER (Prostitution) VERY VISIBLY ... and the officials never-ever bothered her - or in any way tried to interfere with (impair) her CONTRACT Business ever again!!! THIS PROCEDURE DOES WORK!!!
On ONE ENTIRE BLOCK (near where the Kingdome used to be) the City of Seattle REMOVED ALL PARKING METERS, put in "Load /Unload Zone" signs, -AND- ORDERED all Parking Enforement Officers to STAY OFF THAT ENTIRE BLOCK - OR BE FIRED!!!
An acquaintnce of mine, who regularly came to my Law Study Group (2X month) meetings at Tacoma, had a Marijuana Grow House (long before 'legalization') at Tacoma, Washington ... Two days after Harvest City of Tacoma Police engaged in an FIRE-ARMED Incusion, and took the remaining trimmings, leaves that had fallen off the plants, and all the Grow Equipment from the house ... followed by "Criminal Charges" ... VIOLATION OF UNIFORM CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ACT (Drug 'laws') ... when he contacted me, we submitted a CLAIM(s) Process ACCEPTING Oath of Office CONTRACT(s) of the participating Police Officers and their Suprvisors, the Chief of Police, the City Attorney, the Pierce County Prosecutor, the state Attorney General, and the Governor, Demand FORFEITURE OF BOND /Surety(s) upon Failure to Produce EVIDence that the investigating & participating Officials had ACTUAL EVIDENCE that the rentor of the property (my acquaintance) was NOT an "ULTIMATE USER" Tottally EXCEPTED from the Act: "MAY LAWFULLY POSSESS CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES UNDER THE ACT" (act covers Manufacture, Distribution, Dispensing, and Possesion), see Washington Session Law(s) 2020 c 133 § 2. Prior: 2019 c 394 § 9; 2019 c 158 § 12; 2019 c 55 § 11; prior: 2018 c 132 § 2; prior: 2017 c 317 § 5; 2017 c 212 § 11; 2017 c 153 § 1; prior: 2015 2nd sp.s. c 4 § 901; 2015 c 70 § 4; 2014 c 192 § 1; prior: 2013 c 276 § 2; 2013 c 116 § 1; 2013 c 12 § 2; prior: 2013 c 3 § 2 (Initiative Measure No. 502, approved November 6, 2012); 2012 c 8 § 1; 2010 c 177 § 1; 2003 c 142 § 4; 1998 c 222 § 3; 1996 c 178 § 18; 1994 sp.s. c 9 § 739; 1993 c 187 § 1; prior: 1990 c 248 § 1; 1990 c 219 § 3; 1990 c 196 § 8; 1989 1st ex.s. c 9 § 429; 1987 c 144 § 2; 1986 c 124 § 1; 1984 c 153 § 18; 1980 c 71 § 2; 1973 2nd ex.s. c 38 § 1; 1971 ex.s. c 308 § 69.50.101 [RCW 69.50.302 (c)(3)] ....... (c) The following persons need not register and may lawfully possess controlled substances under this chapter: ... (3) An ultimate user or a person in possession of any controlled substance pursuant to a lawful order of a practitioner or in lawful possession of a substance included in Schedule V. ....... and also Pub. L. 91–513, title II, § 401, Oct. 27, 1970, 84 Stat. 1260; Pub. L. 95–633, title II, § 201, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3774; Pub. L. 96–359, § 8(c), Sept. 26, 1980, 94 Stat. 1194; Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §§ 224(a), 502, 503(b)(1), (2), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2030, 2068, 2070; Pub. L. 99–570, title I, §§ 1002, 1003(a), 1004(a), 1005(a), 1103, title XV, § 15005, Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3207–2, 3207–5, 3207–6, 3207–11, 3207–192; Pub. L. 100–690, title VI, §§ 6055, 6254(h), 6452(a), 6470(g), (h), 6479, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4318, 4367, 4371, 4378, 4381; Pub. L. 101–647, title X, § 1002(e), title XII, § 1202, title XXXV, § 3599K, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4828, 4830, 4932; Pub. L. 103–322, title IX, § 90105(a), (c), title XVIII, § 180201(b)(2)(A), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1987, 1988, 2047; Pub. L. 104–237, title II, § 206(a), title III, § 302(a), Oct. 3, 1996, 110 Stat. 3103, 3105; Pub. L. 104–305, § 2(a), (b)(1), Oct. 13, 1996, 110 Stat. 3807; Pub. L. 105–277, div. E, § 2(a), Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–759; Pub. L. 106–172, §§ 3(b)(1), 5(b), 9, Feb. 18, 2000, 114 Stat. 9, 10, 13; Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title III, § 3005(a), title IV, § 4002(d)(2)(A), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1805, 1809; Pub. L. 109–177, title VII, §§ 711(f)(1)(B), 732, Mar. 9, 2006, 120 Stat. 262, 270; Pub. L. 109–248, title II, § 201, July 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 611; Pub. L. 110–425, § 3(e), (f), Oct. 15, 2008, 122 Stat. 4828, 4829; Pub. L. 111–220, §§ 2(a), 4(a), Aug. 3, 2010, 124 Stat. 2372; Pub. L. 115–391, title IV, § 401(a)(2), Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5220 [21 USC 822(c)], AND your states enactment of the UCSA ... ALL "CHARGES" WERE DROPPED ....... -and- He published a NOTICE in the County Recorder's RECORD(s), and put a copy on each door of the Garage he had rented for his new GROW Location, and last I knew - some EIGHT (8) YEARS later, the Sheriff's Department had not gone anywhere near the Grow Garage and he, in plain View, grew and sold THREE (3) Crops a Year for over Eight (8) Years BEFORE 'Legalization'!!!!!!!
HAWAII COUNTY /ISLAND: Several years ago an Asset Protection /Estate Planning client bought 500 ACRES on the Big Island (HAWAII) - Paid 'Cash' - to build a new home ... thde County "Permit" department REFUSED to issue permits (processed by a local expedited for the company) for pre-approved new Building(s), HOME, etc., and as Chairman of the Board of Directors of the company (Business Trust) that had purchased the Land, I was asked to "DO SOMETHING" ... We initiated Administrative Process, ACEPTING Oath /CONTRACT(s) and BOND(s) /Surety(s0 of each LAND USE COMMISSION Member, demanding they produce EVIDENCE of the Valuable Consideration the County had Tendered /Paid for an ownership interest in the Land upon which the County could determine what activities occur on the land and /or charge RENT(s) (Property Taxes) on the land, after completing the THREE STEP Due Process Record, and RECORDING it over the Deed in the County Recorder's Office ... The head of the Land Use Comission saw the local Expediter in the hallway and shouted at him, then ASKed "WHAT IS YOUR CLIENT DOING TO US ... WE CAN NEVER AGAIN ASK FOR PERMITS, LICENCES, OR CHARGE TAXES ON THAT LAND!!!??? (SIDE NOTE: It was about a year after purchase of the land when the process was completed ... and the company was OFFERRED TWo TIMES the AMOUNT Paid for the land ... someone wanted Land that was even better than "Crown Land" to own!!!)
============= =======
ALSO Study the law of Public MINISTER ... start with Bouvier's Law Dictionary (1856 Ed.):
BOUVIER’s LAW DICTIONARY (1856), to wit:
MINISTER, international law. This is the general name given to public functionaries who represent their country abroad, such as ambassadors, (q.v.) envoys, (q.v.) and residents. (q.v.) A custom of recent origin has introduced a new kind of ministers, without any particular determination of character; these are simply called ministers, to indicate that they are invested with the general character of a sovereign's mandatories, without any particular assignment of rank or character.
2. The Minister represents his government in a vague and indeterminate manner, which cannot be equal to the first degree; and he possesses all the rights essential to a public minister.
We are ALL Public MINISTERs for our union states nthat do not have the Offices filled with Elected /Appointed and Qualified Office Holder's and WE can perform the DUTY(s) of each and every Office when dealing with a FOREIGN Jurisdiction ... inclusive of the Corporate State(s) and "Federal Government" state!!!
We can also Elect /Appoint Officers to those offices, get them Qualified (Oath - Bond) and have the union State(s) start performing thier DUTY(s), inclusive of capturing and imprisononing the TRAITORS operating the Corporate State(s) - IT IS OUR DUTY TO DO SO!!!!!!!
THAT IS WHAT NLA IS ALL ABOUT ... NOT talking about what "Needs to be done" but DOING IT OURSELVES!!!
"Keny"
Infamous Keny
Kenneth-Wayne: Leaming.
206-852-3377
