CPS/Family Court

De facto judges, CPS and APS workers are operating a state sanctioned kidnaping racket [RICO]. These predators operating under the color of law are kidnaping our children and seniors for money. They demoralize and destroy the developing mind of our children during their most tender years and our vulnerable parents during their twilight years turning the beginning and end of their lives into nightmares, leaving shattered and distraught families in their wake.

Because our elected and appointed servants refuse to protect and champion our most precious and hallowed resource, our children, We the People through the Unified United States Common Law Grand Jury will champion this holy cause with a relentless determination to bring justice upon these wicked stewards. We Promise!

"Lo, children are an heritage of the LORD: and the fruit of the womb is his reward. As arrows are in the hand of a mighty man; so are children of the youth. Happy is the man that hath his quiver full of them: they shall not be ashamed, but they shall speak with the enemies in the gate." Governor of the Universe. Psa 127:3-5



Gary T's picture

I would like to join in your CPS Lawsuit.
I have had a hell of time dealing with those child stealing monsters.
What they do has ramifications to custody matters, even when you have proven your innocence.
I faced repeated attempts from CPS to impugn my good name, and disproved them all, but their timing for these charges was no accident, taking place during a custody trial.
So, while I am having a custody trial, I am under temporary orders of protection from seeing my child. Even after acquittal, the custody judge continues to deny me any access to my child.
I have filed a federal lawsuit against my local CPS, and I can share that with you all as well.
See their "interview" with me that I took by hidden camera:

SJL's picture

I just wrote an affidavit using the word “traitorously” over 100 times to describe the court officials' crimes and attempted crimes against me. I just realized that using “traitorously” as a word may be inappropriate for my affidavit in the joint action at law since the first round is only seeking remedies for lack of due process. Should I omit the word traitorously and use a different word that relates to lack of due process? If so, which ones?

Here is some information about the art of using terms in law:

2. There are certain terms of art used, so appropriated by the law to express the precise idea which it entertains of the offence, that no other terms, however synonymous they may seem, are capable of filling the same office: such, for example, as traitorously, (q. v.) in treason; feloniously, (q. v.) in felony; burglariously, (q. v.) in burglary; maim, (q. v.) in mayhem, &c. 7th. (INDICTMENT - 2.: Bouvier's Law Dictionary 1856)

SCRIBERE EST AGERE. To write is to act. Treasonable words set down in writing amount to
overt acts of treason. 2 Rolle, 89; 4 Bl.Comm. 80; Broom, Max. 312, 967. (Black's Law Dictionary 4th) (Nisi prius court documentation may be actual treasonable words set down in writing!)

PERIPHRASIS. Circumlocution; the use of other words to express the sense of one.
2. Some words are so technical in their meaning that in charging offences in indictments they must be used or the indictment will not be sustained; for example, an indictment for treason must contain the word traitorously; (q. v.) an indictment for burglary, burglariously; ( q. v.) and feloniously (q. v.) must be introduced into every indictment for felony. 1 Chitty's Cr. Law, 242; 3 Inst. 15; Carth. 319; 2 Hale , P. C. 172; 184;, 4 Bl. Com. 307; Hawk B. 2, c. 25, s. 55; 1 East P. C. 115; Bac. Ab. Indictment, G 1; Com. ]Dig. Indictment, G 6 Cro. C. C. 37. (Bouvier's 1856)

TRAITOROUSLY. In criminal pleading. An essential word in indictments for treason. The offense must be laid to have been committed traitorously. Whart.Crim.Law, 100. (Black's Law Dictionary 4th)

TREASON, crim. law. This word imports a betraying, treachery, or breach of allegiance
e. 4 Bl. Com. 75.
2. The constitution of the United States, art. 3, s. 3, defines treason against the United States to consist only in levying war (q. v.) against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid or comfort. This offence is punished with death. Act of April 30th, 1790, 1 Story's Laws U. S. 83. By the same article of the constitution, no person shall be convicted of treason, unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court. Vide, generally, 3 Story on the Const. ch. 39, p. 667; Serg. on the Const. ch. 30; United States v. Fries, Pamph.; 1 Tucker's Blackst. Comm. Appen. 275, 276; 3 Wils. Law Lect. 96 to 99;
Foster, Disc. I; Burr's Trial; 4 Cranch, R. 126, 469 to 508; 2 Dall. R. 246; 355; 1 Dall. Rep. 35; 3 Wash. C. C. Rep. 234; 1 John. Rep. 553 11 Johns. R. 549; Com. Dig. Justices, K; 1 East, P. C. 37 to 158; 2 Chit. Crim. Law, 60 to 102; Arch. Cr. Pl. 378 to 387. (Bouvier's Law Dictionary 1856)

. Change of a thing established for something new.
2. Innovations are said to be dangerous, as likely to unsettle the common law. Co. Litt. 370, b; Id. 282, b. Certainly no innovations ought to be made by the courts, but as every thing human, is mutable, no legislation can be, or ought to be immutable; changes are required by the alteration of circumstances; amendments, by the imperfections of all human institutions but laws ought never to be changed without great deliberation, and a due consideration of the reasons on which they were founded, as of the circumstances under which they were enacted. Many innovations have been made. in the common law, which philosophy, philanthropy and
common sense approve. The destruction of the benefit of clergy; of appeal, in felony; of trial by battle and ordeal; of the right of sanctuary; of the privilege to abjure the realm; of approvement, by which any criminal who could, in a judicial combat, by skill, force or fraud kill his accomplice, secured his own pardon of corruption of blood; of constructive treason; will be sanctioned; by all wise men, and none will desire a return to these barbarisms. The reader is referred to the case of James v. the Commo wealth, 12 Serg. & R. 220, and 225 to 2 Duncan, J., exposes the absurdity of some ancient laws, with much sarcasm. (Bouvier's 1856)

The rest is about treason from Black's Law Dictionary 4th Edition:

TREASON. The offense of attempting by overtacts to overthrow the government of the state to
which the offender owes allegiance; or of betraying the state into the hands of a foreign power.
Webster. "Treason" consists of two elements: Adherence to the enemy, and rendering him aid and comfort. Cramer v. U. S., U.S.N.Y., 65 S.Ct. 918, 932, 325 U.S. 1, 89 L.Ed. 1441.

In England, treason is an offense particularly directed against the person of the sovereign, and consists (1) in compassing or imagining the death of the king or queen, or their eldest son and heir; (2) in violating the king's companion, or the king's eldest daughter unmarried, or the
wife of the king's eldest son and heir; (3) in levying war against the king in his realm; (4) in adhering to the king's enemies in his realm, giving to them aid and comfort in the realm or elsewhere, and (5) slaying the chancellor, treasurer, or the king's justices of the one bench or the other, justices in eyre, or justices of assize, and all other justices assigned to hear and determine, being in their places doing their offices. 4 Steph.Comm. 185-193; 4 Bl. Comm. 76-84.

Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. U.S.Const. art. 3, § 3, cl. 1.
See Young v. U. S., 97 U.S. 62, 24 L.Ed. 992; U. S. v. Bollman, 1 Cranch, C.C. 373, Fed.Cas.No.14,622; U. S. v. Pryor, 3 Wash.C.C. 234, Fed.Cas.No.16,096.

Constructive Treason
Treason imputed to a person by law from his conduct or course of actions, though his deeds
taken severally do not amount to actual treason. This doctrine is not known in the United States.

High Treason
In English law. Treason against the king or sovereign, as distinguished from petit or petty
treason, which might formerly be committed against a subject. 4 Bl.Comm. 74, 75; 4 Steph.
Comm. 183, 184, note.

MISPRISION OF TREASON. The bare knowledge and concealment of an act of treason or
treasonable plot, that is, without any assent or participation therein, for if the latter elements be present the party becomes a principal. 4 Bl.Comm. 120; Pen.Code Cal. '§ 38.

Petit Treason
In English law. The crime committed by a wife in killing her husband, or a servant his lord or
master, or an ecclesiastic his lord or ordinary. 4 Bl.Comm. 75. Treason-felony Under the English statute 11 & 12 Vict. c. 12, passed in 1848, is the offense of compassing, devising, etc., to depose her majesty from the crown; or to levy war in order to intimidate either house of parliament, etc., or to stir up foreigners by any printing or writing to invade the kingdom. This offense is punishable with penal servitude for life, or for any term not less than five years, etc., under statutes 11 & 12 Vict. c. 12, § 3; 20 & 21 Vict. c. 3, § 2; 27 & 28 Vict. c. 47, § 2. By the statute first above mentioned, the government is enabled to treat as felony many offenses which must formerly have been treated as high treason. Mozley & Whitley.

AZ - Maricopa - Brown's picture

Dear John. I agree that police have become too aggressive, BUT remember we are only seeing what the news is showing us. I believe with the pool party there is more to it than what we are being told and shown. I have have read articles and seen videos that tell and show a totally different story. Rgds

icebox's picture

Good morning everyone, I missed Sunday nights conference call. Do we have an archive available to listen to these calls? Thank you for your response.

prov2828's picture

INSURRECTION and REBELLION...... the corporate government is committing... see 14th amendment section 3. call it what it is..

Quo Warranto to Federal Court for oath of DE FACTO judge Brady filed Jan 2015

magistrate dismisses

relator objects

Bond company motions to dismiss

"the people" sit and wait for this subpoena to be served. Why do you think that is?

If I were going to SUPPORT this action I would write and file this Amici Curiae to the court. Anybody has the right and power to do this..
You can tweak as you see fit.....

God's warrior and devoted daughter seeking justice for abused parents by the corporate courts. My contact is in the webpage and the Quo Warranto

How far will you go and what will you do to support freedom?

greg skomaroske's picture

I have read it.

proboknows1's picture

where is the info on the 2-3 cent stamps? I can't find it

I AM's picture

Public Notice: Attention Lancaster County Sheriff, Terry Wagner; Case No.’s #JV13-1323, and #CI11-4438 Administrative Courts NOT recognized!

June 12, 2015
Lancaster County Sheriff, Terry Wagner;
Cc: Lincoln Police Chief, Jim Peschong
Cc: District Governor, Pete Ricketts
Cc: Secretary of State, John A. Gale
Cc: Nebraska Attorney General; Doug Peterson
Cc: Lancaster County Attorney, Joseph P. Kelly;
Cc: Diocese of Lincoln, Archibishop James D. Conley, D.D., S.T.L.
Cc: Judicial Vicar Rev. Msgr.,
Cc: All Public Media
Sheriff Wagner;
Please see attached Superior Court Order involving Douglas Bryan House, “a Natural, private, living, flesh & blood being, on the Land, vs. the State of Nebraska, et al, Lancaster County, Nebraska, et al, Lancaster County Courts, et al.
This Court Order is Superior in Nature, and overrules both the Separate Juvenile Court of Lancaster County, and the Lancaster County Court Case No.’s #JV13-1323, and #CI11-4438, respectively, ruling on this, the 12th Day of June, 2015, as neither Administrative Court had no lawful jurisdiction to hear, adjudicate, or rule, upon these unlawful assaults perpetrated by the named BAR Attorneys, and “Administrative Clerks,” Jodi L. Nelson, Esquire, or “Juvenile Judge,” Reggie L. Ryder, Esquire, and prosecuted by and BAR Attorneys, Joseph P. Kelley, Esquire, and all other “Esquires,” so named, as all of whom are agents of a private, foreign, for-profit, corporation known as the Crown Templar of London, England.
IMPORTANT NOTE: Administrative Law, which has prevailed over the Land since 1871, has recently been found, by a Federal Judge, to be unlawful & unConstitutional, and ALL such “Administrative Courts” are NOW TERMINATED, NULL & VOID, ab initio! [http://www.fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/judge-rules-administrative-cou....
It should be self-evident, Sir, that this Superior Court of the People does NOT recognize the “Administrative Courts,” as they are illegitimate & unConstitutional foreign operations on American soil. Insomuch, we do NOT NOTICE these courts with our Court Orders. Rather, we NOTICE legitimate & Constitutional Law Enforcement Agents, as in the Nebraska Governor and the County Sheriffs, who are elected Constitutional officers, who under Oath to comply with these Orders.
We also NOTICE the Vatican, as these “Administrative Courts” are under the control of the Roman Catholic Church, and the Roman Curia. The Vatican is ultimately responsible for the criminal behavior & violations of these courts, and as such, we do issue our Orders & recommendations to the Archbishops, who are obligated to report these crimes against humanity.
As you will read in the order, both Nelson, and Ryder, have conspired with other members of judiciary,, to seize Douglas Bryan House’s private property, as in the abduction of his daughter, Shelby Lynn House, and by committing acts of piracy & barratry, both of which are State & Federal felonies, pursuant 15 USC 1 & 2.
Neither Nelson, or Ryder, or any other corporate personna, or individuals, have the ability to rebut any of the listed charges contained in this Court Order, including the fact that both “individuals” are members of the National Lawyers Guild, a Communist Party organization, and officers of the Nebraska BAR Association, which is an Unconstitutional private corporation, currently operating in “Bad Faith,” and which is NOT in “Good Standing” with the Secretary of State.
In addition; this order directs you to reject, and to refuse to execute any & all unlawful Lancaster County Court Orders, or the Separate Juvenile Court of Lancaster County, to seize Mr. House’s private property, or assets, and you are to protect & defend Mr. House, and his daughter, Shelby, from all unlawful assaults upon his/their property. Failure to protect Mr. House, or his daughter, is NOT an option, less you wish to be equally charged with these criminal violations!
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, you are invited to call this Court to discuss the law, and/or your Constitutional obligations to comply with these orders.
Also for your consideration, Sir, and for the fact that neither Ryder, or Nelson, have ever held proper & valid Oaths of Office, as they are prohibited from acting as “government agents,” or “government officials,: by the State of Nebraska Constitution, and by the Original XIII Amendment, and other provisions, constraints, and prohibitions, of the United States of America Constitution, circa 1791;
U.S. v. Throckmorton, 98 US 61; WHEREAS, officials and even judges have no immunity (See, Owen vs. City of Independence, 100 S Ct. 1398; Maine vs. Thiboutot, 100 S. Ct. 2502; and Hafer vs. Melo, 502 U.S. 21; officials and judges are deemed to know the law and sworn to uphold the law; officials and judges cannot claim to act in good faith in willful deprivation of law, they certainly cannot plead ignorance of the law, even the Citizen cannot plead ignorance of the law, the courts have ruled there is no such thing as ignorance of the law, it is ludicrous for learned officials and judges to plead ignorance of the law therefore there is no immunity, judicial or otherwise, in matters of rights secured by the Constitution for the United States of America. See: Title 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. “When lawsuits are brought against federal officials, they must be brought against them in their “individual” capacity not their official capacity. When federal officials perpetrate constitutional torts, they do so ultra vires (beyond the powers) and lose the shield of immunity.”
Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S.Ct. 1401 (1958). “No state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it.” The constitutional theory is that we the people are the sovereigns, the state and federal officials only our agents.” “The individual, unlike the corporation, cannot be taxed for the mere privilege of existing. The corporation is an artificial entity which owes its existence and charter powers to the state; but, the individual’s rights to live and own property are natural rights for the enjoyment of which an excise cannot be imposed.”
Redfield v Fisher, 292 P 813, at 819 [1930] “…an officer may be held liable in damages to any person injured in consequence of a breach of any of the duties connected with his office…The liability for nonfeasance, misfeasance, and for malfeasance in office is in his ‘individual,’ not his official capacity…”
If you would not mind, Sir, reviewing & understanding each of the attached documents, as you are, herein, personally responsible for the knowledge contained within them.
In Service, Honor & Integrity!
Steven Duane Curry; Judge
Superior Court of the Continental United States of America
(970) 249-8879
Certified Registry No.’s #: #7014-1820-0001-9401-5359/5342/5366

Penny Cillin's picture

Caller Lynn says:
1. Her computer is 20 years old (will address this in detail later in post).
2. She is indigent such that even $5 to spare is a luxury.
3. She has little if any access to transportation.
4. She is supposed to be kicked out of her house this weekend.
5. She desperately needs all paper forms, instructions, samples to join CPS lawsuit.

Can someone with NLA verify Lynn's mailing address, print out all papers Lynn would need to read and complete, then mail them to her via the post office in a large envelope, but also **include** a self-addressed, pre-stamped return envelope so she can then mail completed papers back to an NLA representative at no cost to her?

About Lynn's computer:
If her computer is indeed 20 years old, this dates her hardware back to around 1995 and her operating system is quite possible as old as Windows 3.1 and no newer than Windows 95 or 98 (if she's using Windows rather than Apple/Mac).

An important clue she gave during the call was that she's constantly having to delete files to free up hard drive space. When I first started doing tech support in the 1990s, that was the #1 daily task, i.e. deleting old files to free up space so new documents could be created and saved, so Lynn's struggle is a familiar one.

If her PC really is that ancient, then her hard drive space and operating system will not function with 99% of the software and utilities you and I use seamlessly today to share files and communicate via the Internet.

I'm curious how she's getting email and if perhaps she's on an old dial-up connection to the Internet rather than high-speed cable or DSL. If her operating system is at least Windows 95 or 98, she might be able to browse and check email with a very old version of Internet Explorer, but her speed and functionality will still be extremely limited on the web and in fact I'd be surprised if she's able view the NLA website very well at all.

Anyway, maybe NLA has someone available who could bear the cost of printing the lawsuit forms on paper, a large outer envelope, the outbound postage to her plus a self-addressed pre-stamped envelope enclosed so she can mail the completed papers right back to NLA.

Thanks much,


vhannevig's picture

Great minds think alike, Penny. :-)

As the call was ending, someone in a (relatively speaking) close-by Pennsylvania county printed out all papers Lynn would need to read and complete and mailed them to her with extra stamps.

KevinS's picture

I guess that the secretary at the sheriffs office is freaking out and doesn't know what all these faxes are for! lol I may have to go up and lend them a hand just incase of paper cuts.

PatAZMaricopa's picture

The fact that Child Protective Service (CPS) or other government funded agencies can charge parents with “Medical Neglect” for refusing to give their child a dangerous and potentially life-threatening psychiatric drug is an oxymoron. There is no “medical” or scientific test in existence to prove any child has a “mental disorder” or “mental illness, so how it is medical neglect to refuse to drug a child, where there is no evidence of “medical abnormality”? Diagnosis is completely and utterly subjective—based solely on a checklist of behaviors. The only medical risk to the child is when they are prescribed psychiatric drugs.

Only once a child is prescribed drugs, such as antipsychotics documented to cause brain shrinkage or antidepressants which can cause delusional thinking, mania and psychosis, this is the actual “illness,” which has been chemically induced. Psychiatrists openly admit that psychiatric drugs do not “cure” anyone, and that there are no medical tests to confirm any psychiatric diagnosis as a medical condition. Therefore the term medical neglect must be stricken from any accusations made by the mental health industry, Child Protective Services or any other government agency.

There have been more than 200 international drug regulatory agency warnings that psychiatric drugs can cause dangerous and potentially life-threatening affects. This is now common knowledge and the information is easily available to any doctor or psychiatrist. When a psychiatrist or other mental health practitioner prescribes such drugs and puts the child at risk of being prescribed drugs documented to have severe side effects, in direct opposition to the parent/legal guardian’s wishes, and in disregard of the life and safety of the child, this should be a criminal offense.

TheYoda's picture


PatAZMaricopa's picture

by Steven R. Isham M.A., L.B.S.W
Health Impact News

The philosophy of “best interest of the child” sounds so very wonderful. It must keep children safe and help them to be successful for the remainder of their lives. Taking them from horrible parents, away from the abuse/neglect and placing them with foster parents in wonderful foster homes is the true solution to one of society’s worst corruptions.

Arizona Revised Statute A.R.S.25-403. Legal decision-making; best interests of child

In a contested legal decision-making or parenting time case, the court shall make specific findings "on the record" about all relevant factors and the reasons for which the decision is in the “best interests of the child.”
So, let us look at the National Foster Care Outcomes achieved from this wonderful intervention strategy to save children and put them on the road to a life of success. It must be exciting since we have federal funding that helps support this special cause, our future.

National Foster Care Outcomes

Ron Flick's picture

The Stanley family kidnapping is more than just a story of gross injustice and the unwarranted assault on MMS, a product NLA members are already cognizant of through the efforts of one G. Edward Griffin author of “The Creature of Jekyll Island. http://nationallibertyalliance.org/health-issues

No, this story goes far deeper than most CPS, DHS stories, because this story has Doc Washburn, a patriot (potentially in our corner) championing the victims in this abuse of the state's power to corrupt absolutely. And this patriot has a microphone, a large face book following, and an FM Prime time radio show in the capital city of Little Rock, Arkansas, with a potential listening audience of half a million people, not to mention the entire Executive Branches of government; the very Oath Takers who will be receiving the NLA FAXing History making extravaganza shortly. This Stanley family story has captured the attention of some 120 such groups nationally that are fighting the court system with BAR attorneys, ignorant of what oath they take to support whom.

Stephanie Strong of South Dakota has posted the youtube video on the NLA blog that most of us have seen by now... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNzJUdeEoA4 -
This human interest story hits several of our NLA committees: The Media, the Courtroom Observers, the Sheriff, the Family courts, CPS.., the Affiliations, and the Welcoming committees. It is time the nations' patriot groups join NLA, and this story might be the catalyst to make that happen.

Mr. Washburn already has a copy of the Duty of the Sheriff, by what Authority and our Common Law Handbook. I saw to that three months ago, when I dropped them off to his receptionist at the radio station along with my NLA business card. Doc was talking Constitutional issues that week and I knew he needed this info.

Like my self and many of you, Mr. Washburn is dumb as a box of rocks, and thinks that getting the right person elected holds the key to solving our political and domestic problems. We, you and I, have the opportunity to enlighten Doc Washburn on just what NLA is and how we can help him help himself, his audience and ultimately the Stanley Family toward getting their children back. And this song, our “song” can be playing in the background of the Stanley issue all while our esteemed Oath Takers are receiving NLA Faxes to educate them as to their Constitutional duties as our servants.

Timing is EVERYTHING. Doc Washburn will be receiving that education right along with them if we can steer him to our website, the Monday Call and ultimately to membership in Arkansas. Just saying. We have a golden opportunity placed before us to ultimately enlighten ALL of Arkansas, and thus the 120 other nation wide groups already on this path.

Who is Radio Talk-show host Doc Washburn? Prime time KARN 102.9 FM - M-F from 2PM to 6 PM CST daily http://www.newsradio1029.com/ - top right Click - LISTEN LIVE. Doc Washburn is on this CPS, DHS, Family Court issue like beans on rice and is not letting go of it until Justice is served for the Stanleys. For the past month, at least one hour a day, Doc has covered this story. We can all listen in to know when it is the right time to call his station to say our piece. Last week I was in town driving home and he was discussing the Stanley family issue. I called in, but wasn't put on until the final one minute before the top of the hour break. I managed to give the full website address and a brief message on the CPS action on the front page. Doc's Radio station phone number is 1-501-433-0092. Save this message to a file for referencing it later.

Some more things associated with this story: This link comes from KARK TV a complimentary news outlet to the Washburn affiliate radio station; KARN. Arkansas Matters covers the entire state of Arkansas. http://www.arkansasmatters.com/story/d/story/hot-springs-family-returns-...

April 18th Doc spoke before the Arkansas Tea Party Alliance in Hot Springs, Arkansas where 250 participants were gathered, as he asked the crowd to help him start a fund for the Stanley's so as to help pay for their attorney fees. Last week, April 22 he interviewed Congressman Kim Hammer of the Arkansas Legislature. Mr Hammer is the House Chair for the Arkansas Joint Performance Review. Congressman Hammer was Doc's guess for a short update on the progress of this review concerning the Arkansas DHS, Garland County Sheriff's Department and CPS as it relates to the Stanley family affair. Mr. Hammer told us that a review and investigation of this type normally takes about two months and that we should expect to see some results that are to be posted on the state legislative website in June.

Oath Takers; Congressman Kim Hammer - 25th District - of Benton, Arkansas - 501-840-3841  - kimdhammer@yahoo.com  is heading up this review on the House side and Alan Clark of Lonsdale, Arkansas - District 13 - 501-262-3360 is the point person on the Senate side.

Doc's message: If it happened to the Stanleys it can happen to your family. Mr. Washburn's call in phone bank needs to light up,when he starts talking about the Stanley issue. However a word of caution to those who will be calling in to his radio show: Doc is real big on the One minute message, so if he throws that up when your time in the limelight comes - have a one minute speech that covers all the bases...links and such. Rehearse a one minute speech that fits that very real option. If he gives you longer, make use of it. Have a list of talking points written out to reference: Website, Monday Night national call, click on CPS link on front page, watch the videos, call the host and ask questions.

We need to drive Washburn's audience to NLA to get them involved with our Joint Action Suite. There is a trial date set for late May where we need to have Courtroom Observers present. http://nationallibertyalliance.org/forums/courtroom-observers

“When Sleeping Women Wake, Mountains Move.”
– Chinese proverb

Jefferson-A.I.T-MO's picture

I was wondering about a timeframe of when the CPS group lawsuit will be kicking off>. as me and another victim of the chancery courts in sw missouri GREENE COUNTY,SPRINGFIELD MISSOURI,one is court supervised probate and the other is a child support case that has been dragging on for 21 years > time limitations on both cases are nearing fast>. will this be a timely group lawsuit?as so many of we the people are counting on this remedy AND recourse but most importantly to hold these judicial criminals 100% responsible for their actions or in most cases non actions.

John Darash's picture

When we finish with intake ... obviously we need to know who is going to be on the lawsuit, their affidavit and all the info on who we are suing this takes time and the more volunteers we can get the faster this will happen.

Jefferson-A.I.T-MO's picture

So basically we will move the individual cases forward as soon as they are ready for court? or will you collect as many as possible then file all together?the reason i ask is because we are o n a time limit due to statute of limitations in missouri?since we will be using common law i n an open court of record for the suit will the statutes of limitations in place now be null and void?

TheYoda's picture

Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Orange County (CA) Child Protective Services Alleges Unwarranted Seizure of Thousands of Children
Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Orange County (CA) Child Protective Services Alleges Unwarranted Seizure of Thousands of Children

Today, the Law Office of Shawn A. McMillan has filed a class action lawsuit against Orange County Child Protective Services alleging that the agency has seized more than 5,000 children without obtaining warrants as required under the 4th and 14th Amendments to the United States Constitution.

God and nation's picture

Why sir, are you so negative about this CPS issue? I'm sure the NLA knows what they are doing and have methods to bypass being held hostage by filing fees. And for you to assume a grandparent would allow a grandchild to be abused is ludicrous, unfounded and your OPINION. Please keep it to yourself.

kateL's picture

I want to help my daughter get her kids back but I'm confused on the paperwork. The last page that says NLA will be her common law POA, and get a 10% fee. What if NLA is not successful. Will we still owe any money to NLA if they spend months trying to do this and the court still won't budge?