- Where to Constitute a Grand Jury
- Press phone call 2-20-14
- How the State Chair is selected
- How corporatism can be defeated
- Grand Jury websites
- Empaneling and compensating juries
- Corporatism
- Conversation with Carl Swensson Jr
- Constituting a Jury
- Common v Corp Juries
- 2-21-14 Word games
Please support our endeavor, help keep NLA on the web,
Donate $5.00 or more a month, and become a Premier Member, Thank you.






Comments
Courses et al
This matter was talked about on Monday's show. The courses have been made easier to accomplish and if you still have troule then you need to email to Kathleen@nationallibertyalliance.org and explain your predicament. I've found her to be a godsend to completing the courses.
Help with courses (reply)
Either of these "help" links can be found under "Free Courses"
http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/help-quiz
http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/constitution-course-directions
Hope this helps !
civics course
I can not access the civics course. Am signed in. There are only 2 places to click. One for updating the years of experience and the other is quizzes. When I click on the here for the years experience it says I am not allowed access. Can I get some help? Thanks.
Troubles Accessing Civics Course Audio on Tablet, Cell, iPad
Q: Is there an app that can be downloaded that will allow me to access the material that requires flash, such as the civics course audio?
A: Yes. You should be able to downloading Puffin, Dolphin, or Photon Browser through playstore for free and then open nationallibertyalliance.org through it. I've had the most success with Puffin for both my tablet and android cell phone which do not support flash.
Here is a link that maybe helpful for ipad devices:
http://www.ispringsolutions.com/articles/can-i-play-flash-on-ipad-yes.html
God bless!
Flash on IPhone
I have been feeling stuck for a few months, not having Flash and therefore unable to access the civics courses, but that all changed today when I saw the message by grizzlyhopehugger about using Puffin as a browser, I loaded Puffin onto my IPhone 3 from the app store and now I am a happy camper working on the civics course. Thank you Grizzly!
:)
Anytime we can help each other it is such a blessing! I'm glad I could share the info. that also helped me, as the civics course is vital to us all learning how to save our Country.
Thank you! I will add this
Thank you! I will add this information to the "Before you Begin the Quiz" page, so others can know!
Speeding Ticket Help - FYI
If you get a speeding ticket in the USA and it appears the posted speed is unrealistically low you might consider researching the Dept of Transportation in your State to verify an Engineering Study was Performed?
If not you are well equipped to argue your case in court.
http://boston.cbslocal.com/2012/05/07/i-team-nearly-900-illegal-speeding...
Avoid a speeding ticket
Here's how to avoid a speeding ticket (humor): https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/b5/0a/6d/b50a6dd585cec19dbd0a1...
re Speeding Ticket Help
It maybe better not to argue any traveling infraction on the specifics of the case. Doing is to acknowledge the Nisi Prius Court has jurisdiction over you. Object on the grounds a Nisi Prius Court does not have jurisdiction over you since you are one of the People subject only to Common Law jurisdiction and entitled to due process of law per Amendments V, VI and VII in the Bill Of Rights. Make it clear you do not give consent for the hearing to proceed under Statute Law.
Additionally cite the fact using the roads for personal, not commercial purposes, is to engage in traveling and that traveling is an unalienable right not subject to Statutes. There are many Federal Court opinions affirming this claim. They include but are not limited to Thompson v Smith, 154 SE 579, Schactman v Dulles, 96 App D.C. 287, 293, State v. Johnson, 245 P 1073, Kent v. Dulles 357 U.S. 116, 125, SHAPIRO v. THOMPSON, 394 U.S. 618 (1969) 394 U.S. 618, Hertado v. California, 110 US 516, CANTWELL v. STATE OF CONNECTICUT, 310 U.S. 296 (1940) 310 U.S, Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 491, Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, 373 U.S. 262, Murdock v Pennsylvania 319 U.S. 105, Miller v. U.S. 230 F 486 at 489, Sherar vs. Cullen 481 F 2D 946, (1973),
You can also cite Federal Statute 18 U.S. Code § 31(a) confirming using the road for personal reasons is not subject to Statue Law since you are not operating a motor vehicle as it is defined in the following: (6) - “The term “motor vehicle” means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, passengers and property, or property or cargo.” Many State Statutes have similar language.
The issue can also be raised a speeding ticket is an Appearance Ticket that does not confer jurisdiction over a defendant. The following cases buttress this claim:
[People v. Gabbay, 670 N.Y.S.2d 962, 175 Misc.2d 421 678 N.Y.S.2d 26,92 N.Y.2d 879, 700 N.E.2d 564 (1997)] "Appearance ticket is not accusatory instrument and its filing does not confer jurisdiction over defendant."
[People v. Giusti, 673 N.Y.S.2d 824, 176 Misc.2d 377 (1998)
"Service of an appearance ticket on an accused does not confer personal or subject matter jurisdiction upon a criminal court."
[U.S. v. Beckford, 966 F.Supp. 1415 (1997)] "Only Congress can make an act a crime, affix punishment to it, and declare court that shall have jurisdiction."
Any traffic ticket is a Bill of Attainder and an ex post facto Law. A Bill of Attainder is a legislative Act that finds a person guilty and imposes a punishment without a trial or conviction. A Bill of Attainder is unconstitutional per Article I Section IX Clause III and Article I Section X Clause I of the U.S. Constitution. An ex post facto law makes illegal an act that was legal (traveling) when the act was committed, increases the penalty of an alleged infraction after the alleged infraction was committed or changes the rules of evidence to make a conviction easier. Traveling, being an unalienable right, is legal but the ticket is attempting to make it illegal. Sometimes a District Attorney will inform the accused just before the hearing the penalty will increase should the accused challenge the ticket and lose thereby increasing the penalty after the alleged infraction was committed. The rules of evidence are changed by the mere fact no evidence can exist against a person who is using the roads solely for personal purposes and not for commercial purposes.
OUTSTANDING
DO the courts have to refund the BOND for alleged speeding tickets, once the alleged defendant shows up to court! The officer did not sign my ticket and nor did I, and I motioned for appeal! They held me in the county jail, until I paid the BOND. I used case law and the CONSTITUTIONAL OATH that officers are bound by as the JUDGE made a statement, that the city of COLUMBUS, GEORGIA is a consoldiated government and officers do not have to follow the law!
traffic infractions
That's a great post! Thank you for taking the time to put it here.
Don't Be Deceived-Republic v Democracy
Q: What type of government do we have? Obama, politicians, media, websites etc. continue to provide misinformation to this very important question. We are definitely in the age of deception and asleep at the wheel.
A: We are a Republic. What exactly does this mean?
A Republican government is one in which the powers of sovereignty are vested in the people and are exercised by the people, either directly, or through representatives chosen by the people, to whom those powers are specially delegated. [In re Duncan, 139 U.S. 449, 11 S.Ct. 573, 35 L.Ed. 219; Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. (21 Wall.) 162, 22 L.Ed. 627. Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, p. 626]. Ruled by Law. Limiting the government. Property Rights=Freedom!
See the 9th and 10th Amendments to see additional limitations on what Congress can and can't do;, as everything is limited to Constitutionality. For any law that comes in conflict with the Constitution is null and void of law, it bares no power to enforce, no obligation to obey, purports to settle as if it never existed. For unconstitutionality dates from the date of enactment of such a law, not from the date so branded in an open court of law. No courts are bound to uphold it. It operates as a fiction of law. Article 6 Paragraph 2 and supported by the Supreme Court decision in Marbury v Madison Vol. 5 US Pg. 137 (1803 ).
Q: What is a democracy?
A: That form of government in which the sovereign power resides in and is exercised by the whole body of free citizens directly or indirectly through a system of representation, as distinguished from a monarchy, aristocracy, or oligarchy. [Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, p. 388; Bond v. U.S. SCOTUS] recognizes personal sovereignty, June 16, 2011. Ruled by the majority without limits. Rights (Freedom and opportunity) are traded for false damaging security.
In fact Democracy is not mentioned one time in the Constitution and our forefathers warned against having a democracy, saying history has repeatedly shown that it is the most dangerous form of government and never lasts long before it turns into an oligarchy. A debate took place, a Republic form of government was chosen to protect the sovereign people's inalienable rights by limiting the government, and an iron clad contract was made in writing that stands in all courts and cannot be broken.
Q: What is an oligarchy?
A: It is the most common government in history and today in which a group rules (e.g., Ancient Greeks,, Rome, Germany- Hiltler, Russia, Obama, etc.) and will create chaos to take total control. Tyranny of the elite that soon becomes an oligarchy with a monopolistic State controlled system which has ownership of the capital. It`s the idea that rights are privileges. Sounding familiar? History repeating itself.
Q: How do we correctly interpret the words used in the Constitution?
A: The words used in Black`s Dictionary, 2nd edition as cited above, are the words used when the Constitution was signed and the definitions within are enforceable by law! Also see Am. Jurisprudence Vol. 16 Sec. 97 which tells judges how the Constitution is to be interpreted; it's supposed to be interpreted in favor of us, the clearly expressed and designated beneficiary`s. It is supposed to be liberally enforced to protect the rights/property of the citizens.
Gain understanding on our Constitution before it's too late. If you don't know your rights you have none. We must be willing to defend them as so many brave individuals have sacrificed their lives throughout history to give us freedom! Freedom is not free and the burden lies on us to defend our rights by first educating ourselves. The info above was derived from the https://www.1215.org/lawnotes/lawnotes/repvsdem.htm and the free Civics Course available on this site!
God Bless! Jesus is my hero!
OUTSTANDING
GREAT INFORMATION:
The Free Civics Course Provides Much Needed Education
Q: Do we have privileges or rights?
A: One of the fundamental problems in America is that the government has convinced us that we have certain privileges granted to us by the government.
The Truth is, we have been endowed with inalienable rights that we don't have to get permission for. Privileges can be revoked at anytime. We the people grant the government privileges; the powers come from us and go to the government. Not the other way around!
All rights are derived from property. Any dispute as to who has the right to do this, that or the other thing can be solved by answering."Who owns the property?" If you own the property, you can do whatever you want, but you must first know your rights and then assert them in a timely manner.
You cannot grant someone a right! Privileges, on the other hand are generally identified by a permit or a license in which you enter a hidden contract.
Q: How do I learn more about my rights?
A: The bottom line is that we all need to read and fully understand the Constitution. It is the Supreme Law of the land, it is in writing, is still standing, and enforceable in any court of law.
Multiple Supreme Court cases support our rights and we need to learn these cases to use them effectively in our arguments.
Q: What are some examples of case law etc. which can be used when I claim my inalienable rights?
A: Marbury v Madison and Article 6 , paragraph 2 of our Constitution provide strong arguments because the truth is that anything that is in conflict with the Constitution is null and void of law, it bears no power to enforce, no obligation to obey, purports to settle as if it never existed. For the unconstitutionality dates from the enactment of such a law, not from the date so branded in an open court of law. Basically, no courts are bound to uphold it, no citizens are bound to obey it. It operates as a mere nullity or a fiction of law.
Furthermore, Murdock v Penn says that, No states may convert a secured liberty into a privilege and issue a permit/license and fee for it, and require you to have it.
Shuttlesworth v Birmingham Alabama says If the state does convert your right into a privilege, issue a license/permit and fee for it, and require you to have it, you can ignore the license/permit and fee and engage in the right with impunity.
The 9th amendment says, Congress has no authority to add onto the Constitution in such a way that it would take away rights previously guaranteed and no authority to pass laws that are in conflict with the Constitution.
Am Jurisprudence Vol 16 Sec 97 tells the judge how the Constitution is to be interpreted and it is in favor of the clearly intended, specifically designated beneficiary, which is interpreted in favor of we the people.
Title 5 US Code Sec 556D is clear and specific in saying if you are denied due process of the law that all jurisdiction ceases automatically and there are Supreme Court cases to support this right that was intentionally included within the Bill of Rights!
Black`s Law Dictionary, pre- 3rd edition, can clear up any misinterpretations. New editions have purposely taken common law out.
Q: What is the punishment when a public servant violates his/her oath?
A: Individuals hiding under the fiction of law (statutes/codes) under unlawful corporations are guilty and punishable by death, as stated in Title 18-treason! We work under the principles of justice and mercy; public servants are given an opportunity to repent and change their ways. Remedy is integral to receiving justice for damages done.
We will all stand on judgment day before the one true King, Jesus Christ and account for the way we lived. God bless all those who are seeking Truth and do not have blinders on. As for the wicked, they shall perish. Psalms 1
Q: What are the references for the above info?
A: I want to reference and give a big thank you to Michael Badnarik & Carl Miller for each of their Constitution Classes, NationalLibertyAlliance.org for sharing the information, supporting, and taking action, and Jesus Christ for making these Truths known!
God bless! Wake up America, we must defend our Liberties together in a unified front now, before it's too late!
OUTSTANDING
GREAT READ and THANK YOU
Privileges or Rights
Again, great post!
Needing Help Seeking Justice!
Click on the frowny face on the right side of the page, select the appropriate option that best fits your circumstances, and follow the instructions. Someone will get back with you, as indicated in the instructions.
Please get involved, as it will take each one of us to save our country!
Info on the 2-3 cent stamps?
Q: Where is the info on the 2-3 cent stamps?
A:
http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/post-office-and-non-domestic
http://nationallibertyalliance.org/files/juristdocs/3%20cent%20postage.pdf
Clarification
I am a new member and am very interested in doing whatever it takes to bring the legal system and the "government" back in line with the organic Constitution . I have been reading the material provided in the jurist section as well as watching the videos . I find the sheer volume of information amazingly informative and hope I can learn to retain as much of it as humanly possible . I am currently going over the information a number of times in order to retain it . I am convinced we're on the right track and that it can be done , however , I haven't listened to a live discussion yet because , as I have said , I just recently joined and have been studying the information available here . A week and a half to be precise . I am a bit concerned by not seeing much information or responses posted to the current date , 5/31/2015 . If anyone could comment or give any clarification as to why this is , I would appreciate it . I live in Florida if that makes a difference .
Join a Committee/Take Free Civics Course
Q: How do I help to bring the legal system and the "government" back in line with the organic Constitution?
A: We have several committees to join, listed under the Committee Tab. If interested, please contact the director of the committee you are interested in. We truly need participation from everyone at whatever capacity they can give.
Also you can take the Free Civics Course by clicking on the Civics Course Tab at the top of the page to continue educating yourself.
Saving America starts with each one of us taking the very steps you are taking now. We look forward to working with you!!!
Re Clarification
Go to Media Tab Upper left , see court filing click on it to see the most recent action taken 5/29 /15 - 5 in May many before.
It would be helpful if FAQ had a Table of Contents or Glossary
Under the Table of Contents could be sub-files regarding subject matter and then at those listings, under that subject matter the actual Tab Category, the Sub heading and the document you wished to locate spelled out there in the NLA Table of Contents. It could probably best follow THE PROCESS John and Gerard is always discussing....or it could follow some sort of train of thought starting with basics of Common Law and some definitions. It could begin with Jurist Orientation....and Tabs one might find such things under. It might follow the items one might find under the Headings at the top of the page and the sub- categories under each and what sort of topics are covered there, in addition to similar subjects closely related that might be found under other tabs and list like-subjects that might apply. This Table of Contents would "cut to the chase" and reduce the present frustration we all have trying to locate subject matter on this huge website.
FAQ should have a Glossary of terms, phrases and words we all use.
Example: A while back NLA was pushing the "3 cent postage" to help the states to afford what they couldn't do for lack of funding. If a new person coming in to NLA wanted to locate such data, they wouldn't know where to look. But if you had a Glossary of terms, which had referenced items, like "3 cents postage" that said See Jurist Tab- Jurist Documents - see list. This would cut out a whole bunch of redundant discussions, which is the basis for FAQ, is it not? Suppose you read an article on MMS and you didn't know what it meant. John D. mentioned it on a call last week. To find out if NLA discussed such things, you could turn to the NLA Glossary and see what it says: See Media tab -Today's issues - G. Edward Griffin. watch first two videos at top of page. Or you wanted to find the Duty of the Sheriff document that was listed in the NLA Glossary....where it said See Welcome Tab - scroll down page - look in right hand margin. Just saying.
This is what I would like to see on this website, and isn't there now and is very frustrating trying to find such things. The paper read last night on the Judges referenced the "Preamble to the Bill of Rights". If one wanted to read this where would then begin to look?? There is no place to look now, so they waste John's time or someone else's or their own looking for something that should already be there. See my point? Both the Table of Contents and the Glossary could be an open-ended project to accommodate the NLA moving target.
Ron Flick
DC #12 - Iowa, Missouri and Arkansas
FAQ Page Currently Under Construction
Hello Ron,
Thank you for your comment and sharing your ideas. It was a pleasure speaking with you today. A glossary is a great idea and should be a very helpful resource!!! God bless!
Q: How will the FAQ page be structured when up and running?
A: It will be laid out in the traditional FAQ format, as I am doing now. We will be working on structuring the page in a way that allows people to find answers to their questions quickly. Additionally the page will periodically be renovated to make improvements as we go, taking suggestions into account.
Monday night Q & A
How to write and file an Administrative Claim against a judge? And do you have any example to follow?
Writing and Filing Administrative Claims Against a Judge
Q: How to write and file an Administrative Claim against a judge? And do you have any example to follow?
A: Click on the Media Tab, as well as the Essays/Lectures Tab under the Menu to research filings, etc.
Missouri christian county sheriff by fed grand jury
Missouri sheriff subpoena by fed grand ,and fbi as well, jan 13th http://www.kspr.com/news/local/christian-county-sheriff-subject-of-feder...
Letter to the Sheriff??
Where can I find the letter to the Sheriff at?
Letter to the Sheriff
Click "Court Filing" under the "Media" tab in the menu bar and scroll down to "Mandamus_to_sheriff.pdf"
NLA members a reminder we have a real time chatroom at our disp
Real time chatroom at our disposal 24-7 just click on mon nite call and scroll down to chat box log in so we can open up our communication lines better.Why are we not using this?
chat and shoot ourselves in the foot??
Thanks Jefferson. I missed the chat box and I thought I did what you said..... My comment though, If I can make it comprehensible...and all due respect and is there is much deserved to Gerard and John and Jack ("common Law" conference friday..."we all" got in an oddly outrageous uproar over something about this....seemed that way to me/ "you can lead horse to water but you can't make him drink....." ) Was it Gerard on last night's call?? said something about some of us "participants" Shooting ourselves in the foot..and that could be etc and also I might be using out of context; I've heard that from other "superiors" at a time when I saw it as a controlling judgment by people who were "framing" me or invalidating my judgment /...who would disclaim there was any trespass of my rights and no accountability of observing rule of law or civility in their behaviors....(like a railroading) not to get too insulting I feel that critical in our social system that participants can be too readily denied thought and is so habitual any protest is treated as disruptive and "know it all;" the agencies or Leaders find themselves bereft of thinking followers and have shot themselves in the foot.???. for us who dare to respect our freedom of will we find ourselves ostracized and maybe in jail. that's at the core of Common law ?????
Missouri Conference chat fri nigh 8pm-10 pm inreal time chat roo
Missouri Conference chat fri night 8pm -10 pm in the real time chat room just click on mon night call top left on home page and scroll down page and log into real time chatroom.>>Kelly State coordinator
Hello people of earth
I was wondering why we as a group are not using out real time chatroom more?
Is The NLA Dying?
Okay, I have to ask, based on the lack of communications throughout this site, it appears this movement is dying. If that is the case, why bother keeping the site up? How do you renew people to take action? Is everyone being blocked on everything being tried? Are there any success stories?
It looks like a serious lack of feedback and that is highly discouraging. If there are a great deal of failures, why not at least post those failures here so others know what does not work. Post the successes as well so we can all learn what does work.
Q: Is the NLA dying?
Q: Is the NLA dying?
A: NLA is alive and well. Please go to the media tab and click on court filings to see the most recent work being done by we the people. We encourage everyone to get involved by joining the conference calls and read through the site. Become a member and then join a committee to use your giftedness/talents to help restore our Republic.
I'm sorry you life turned out so hard,
Now pick up those pieces you keep saying are too heavy and give them another toss,... till your hands bleed. Then you can stop.
Enough said!
Suggestion
Not only should Bar Association members be banned, Freemasons should be banned too. Looking throughout American history, most of the treason has been assisted and/or committed by both of those turncoats!
Urgent!!
So many veils have been lifted, but there are many more!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1p-q-TgBOWo Apparently, America is fake, and all the people are property of USA Corp/The UK Queen/The Vatican. We are under the Queen's rule as an enemy, but public leaders/puppets spew nothing but lies, and informs the world that we are and have been allies!!! It is a trap to enslave us-citizens, and then humanity. :((((( The good news is that they are not ready for us to know this yet. Praise Jesus!
Just a fraction of the mess.
Just a fraction of the mess. Search youtube Birth Certificate Bond and Is Income tax Legal?!
The bright side...
If the power of the courts goes back to the people, then the golden age will be upon us quite quickly as long as mankind can avoid WWIII. As long as the UN exists, the golden age will never happen.
Looking much deeper into the rabbit hole...
Regardless of jurisdiction, common law, military law, civil law, codes, statutes, etc., the UN is going to try to enforce their own branded "Bar" code statutory laws onto every human being on the planet except for those who are employed and empowered by the UN. Corporations are more privileged and will continue to be more privileged than any human being due to the hijacking of the law by the corporations and their lawyers.
Cleaning up the USA justice system will either dissolve the UN or ignite a war from the UN. If the UN is dissolved, there will still be 200+ BANK-note countries ready to go to war against a gold & silver backed Constitutional USA. USA would then turn into Iraq/Syria/N.Korea etc... aka part of the Axis of Evil. That alone goes against everything American citizens/slaves would want - due to all the public brainwashing and mind control tactics they encounter throughout each and every day.
Yes, the cat is out of the bag, but unfortunately for us, the cat can't inform every human being about what has taken place, and what is taking place, and what should take place from here on out. If the all fraudulent powers were no longer in power, then there would be a solid chance for real freedom and real justice.
county unresponsive
so what do we do, when we file the paperwork and the county refuses to either file the papers or give us access to the jury room? They may claim that there are no statutes to support our running of the grand jury. With a local sheriff clearly working in the best interest of the state and not the citizens...what options do we have that doesn't involves spending thousands on an attorney?
Frustrated Supporter
Sent a notice to Tech (Non-)Support last month advising them that I was no longer able to make my one-time donation of $10 because the NLA Website forbids a one-time donation of less than $20. Why would any sane person want to discourage a donation? This website should have a direct line of communication to the bean counters because they might understand better than Tech (Non-)Support.
RE: Frustrated Supporter
I know a lot of websites set a minimum donation because they have problems with credit card thieves using their donation forms to test stolen credit cards. They figure $1 donations aren't worth the risk of $20 chargeback fees or being treated as a suspect by a sheriff.
People verses people..
Am listening to the "Word Games" audio and it occurs to me that where they use a lower case p for people they are talking about individual rights. where they use a capital P they are talking about the people as a whole. No singular member of "the people" has the right or authority to overthrow their government but the People as a whole DO.
Pages